{"title":"颈动脉校正血流时间和多普勒休克指数预测择期腹部手术患者诱导后低血压:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Tao Sun, Kangli Hui, Liwen Ren, Mengtong Han, Xiaoyun Shen, Jingwei Xiong, Hongwei Qi, Manlin Duan","doi":"10.1186/s13741-025-00519-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal surgical patients who have deficient blood volume are at an elevated risk of post-induction hypotension (PIH). New strategies have been adopted, i.e., carotid ultrasound, to evaluate volume status. The study aimed to investigate and compare the predictive value of various carotid ultrasound parameters for PIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were enrolled. Carotid ultrasound was performed before induction to evaluate the carotid flow time (FT), carotid artery velocity time integral (VTI), and Doppler shock index (the DSI<sub>FTc</sub> and DSI<sub>VTI</sub>). Both Wodey's (W) and Bazett's (B) formulae determined the corrected flow time (FTc). The predictive ability of these parameters was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 94 patients were analyzed, and of those, 40 (42.6%) developed PIH. The areas under the curve for FT, FTc(W), 1/DSI<sub>FTc</sub>, and FTc(B) were 0.790 (95% CI 0.697-0.883) (P < 0.05), 0.788 (95% CI 0.695-0.881) (P < 0.001), 0.729 (95% CI 0.626-0.832) (P < 0.001), and 0.689 (95% CI 0.582-0.796) (P < 0.05), respectively. The optimal cut-off for FTc(W) was 334.15 ms (sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 70.4%), while for FT, it was 313.33 ms (sensitivity 72.5%, specificity 79.6%), indicating FTc(W) as the best predictor among these various parameters. The 1/DSI<sub>FTc</sub> was an inferior predictor of PIH, with an optimal cutoff value of 4.58. The sensitivity (80.0%) and specificity (61.1%) values were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carotid flow time corrected by Wodey's formula was a reliable indicator of PIH in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, superior to FT, DSI<sub>FTc</sub>, and FTc(B).</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid corrected flow time and Doppler shock index for prediction of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Sun, Kangli Hui, Liwen Ren, Mengtong Han, Xiaoyun Shen, Jingwei Xiong, Hongwei Qi, Manlin Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13741-025-00519-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal surgical patients who have deficient blood volume are at an elevated risk of post-induction hypotension (PIH). New strategies have been adopted, i.e., carotid ultrasound, to evaluate volume status. The study aimed to investigate and compare the predictive value of various carotid ultrasound parameters for PIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were enrolled. Carotid ultrasound was performed before induction to evaluate the carotid flow time (FT), carotid artery velocity time integral (VTI), and Doppler shock index (the DSI<sub>FTc</sub> and DSI<sub>VTI</sub>). Both Wodey's (W) and Bazett's (B) formulae determined the corrected flow time (FTc). The predictive ability of these parameters was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 94 patients were analyzed, and of those, 40 (42.6%) developed PIH. The areas under the curve for FT, FTc(W), 1/DSI<sub>FTc</sub>, and FTc(B) were 0.790 (95% CI 0.697-0.883) (P < 0.05), 0.788 (95% CI 0.695-0.881) (P < 0.001), 0.729 (95% CI 0.626-0.832) (P < 0.001), and 0.689 (95% CI 0.582-0.796) (P < 0.05), respectively. The optimal cut-off for FTc(W) was 334.15 ms (sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 70.4%), while for FT, it was 313.33 ms (sensitivity 72.5%, specificity 79.6%), indicating FTc(W) as the best predictor among these various parameters. The 1/DSI<sub>FTc</sub> was an inferior predictor of PIH, with an optimal cutoff value of 4.58. The sensitivity (80.0%) and specificity (61.1%) values were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carotid flow time corrected by Wodey's formula was a reliable indicator of PIH in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, superior to FT, DSI<sub>FTc</sub>, and FTc(B).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00519-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00519-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腹部手术患者血容量不足诱导后低血压(PIH)的风险增高。已采用新的策略,即颈动脉超声,以评估容量状态。本研究旨在探讨和比较各种颈动脉超声参数对PIH的预测价值。方法:纳入拟行腹部手术的成年患者。诱导前行颈动脉超声,评估颈动脉血流时间(FT)、颈动脉速度时间积分(VTI)和多普勒冲击指数(DSIFTc和DSIVTI)。Wodey's (W)和Bazett's (B)公式确定了校正流时间(FTc)。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析这些参数的预测能力。结果:最终分析94例患者,其中40例(42.6%)发展为PIH。FT、FTc(W)、1/ dsifc和FTc(B)的曲线下面积为0.790 (95% CI 0.697-0.883) (P FTc是PIH的较差预测因子,最佳截止值为4.58)。灵敏度为80.0%,特异度为61.1%。结论:经Wodey公式校正的颈动脉血流时间是选择性腹部手术患者PIH的可靠指标,优于FT、DSIFTc和FTc(B)。
Carotid corrected flow time and Doppler shock index for prediction of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a prospective observational study.
Background: Abdominal surgical patients who have deficient blood volume are at an elevated risk of post-induction hypotension (PIH). New strategies have been adopted, i.e., carotid ultrasound, to evaluate volume status. The study aimed to investigate and compare the predictive value of various carotid ultrasound parameters for PIH.
Methods: Adult patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were enrolled. Carotid ultrasound was performed before induction to evaluate the carotid flow time (FT), carotid artery velocity time integral (VTI), and Doppler shock index (the DSIFTc and DSIVTI). Both Wodey's (W) and Bazett's (B) formulae determined the corrected flow time (FTc). The predictive ability of these parameters was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results: Finally, 94 patients were analyzed, and of those, 40 (42.6%) developed PIH. The areas under the curve for FT, FTc(W), 1/DSIFTc, and FTc(B) were 0.790 (95% CI 0.697-0.883) (P < 0.05), 0.788 (95% CI 0.695-0.881) (P < 0.001), 0.729 (95% CI 0.626-0.832) (P < 0.001), and 0.689 (95% CI 0.582-0.796) (P < 0.05), respectively. The optimal cut-off for FTc(W) was 334.15 ms (sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 70.4%), while for FT, it was 313.33 ms (sensitivity 72.5%, specificity 79.6%), indicating FTc(W) as the best predictor among these various parameters. The 1/DSIFTc was an inferior predictor of PIH, with an optimal cutoff value of 4.58. The sensitivity (80.0%) and specificity (61.1%) values were obtained.
Conclusion: Carotid flow time corrected by Wodey's formula was a reliable indicator of PIH in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, superior to FT, DSIFTc, and FTc(B).