高抗拉强度纤维混凝土直接抗拉强度试验最佳试样几何形状的数值与试验研究。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Miguel A Vicente, Álvaro Mena-Alonso, Dorys C González, Gonzalo Ruiz, Héctor Cifuentes, Carlos Leiva, Rena Yu, Jesús Mínguez
{"title":"高抗拉强度纤维混凝土直接抗拉强度试验最佳试样几何形状的数值与试验研究。","authors":"Miguel A Vicente, Álvaro Mena-Alonso, Dorys C González, Gonzalo Ruiz, Héctor Cifuentes, Carlos Leiva, Rena Yu, Jesús Mínguez","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-94471-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accurate determination of the tensile strength of concrete is a topic of growing interest, especially driven by the new ultra-high tensile strength fiber-reinforced concretes. However, this is a complex task, as traditional methods provide inconsistent results (both splitting tensile test and 3-point bending test). The most robust method is the direct tensile test. However, in concrete, it poses a technical challenge that has not yet been satisfactorily solved. The aim of this study is the design of a test specimen that maximizes the percentage of successful failure and also allows a viable anchorage solution to the load application equipment, especially for high and ultra-high tensile strength concretes. An optimized geometry of a bone-shaped specimen that maximizes the probability of collapse occurring at the central neck is presented. First, a mathematical function of the generatrix of the bone-shape specimen is presented. The behavior of the solution is also analyzed numerically and statistically, comparing it with other commonly used solutions for direct tensile tests. Additionally, the design, fabrication, and calibration of a tailored cardan joint for load centering, thus minimizing its eccentricity and the dispersion of the results. Finally, the results of a static test campaign carried out on six carbon-fiber reinforced high tensile strength concrete specimens. The proposed bone-shaped specimen shows a much higher percentage of successful failures than the other specimen geometries commonly used for tensile testing, which improves the quality of tensile characterization test campaigns for high and ultra-high tensile strength concretes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical and experimental study of the optimal specimen geometry for direct tension strength tests in high tensile strength fiber reinforced concrete.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel A Vicente, Álvaro Mena-Alonso, Dorys C González, Gonzalo Ruiz, Héctor Cifuentes, Carlos Leiva, Rena Yu, Jesús Mínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-94471-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The accurate determination of the tensile strength of concrete is a topic of growing interest, especially driven by the new ultra-high tensile strength fiber-reinforced concretes. However, this is a complex task, as traditional methods provide inconsistent results (both splitting tensile test and 3-point bending test). The most robust method is the direct tensile test. However, in concrete, it poses a technical challenge that has not yet been satisfactorily solved. The aim of this study is the design of a test specimen that maximizes the percentage of successful failure and also allows a viable anchorage solution to the load application equipment, especially for high and ultra-high tensile strength concretes. An optimized geometry of a bone-shaped specimen that maximizes the probability of collapse occurring at the central neck is presented. First, a mathematical function of the generatrix of the bone-shape specimen is presented. The behavior of the solution is also analyzed numerically and statistically, comparing it with other commonly used solutions for direct tensile tests. Additionally, the design, fabrication, and calibration of a tailored cardan joint for load centering, thus minimizing its eccentricity and the dispersion of the results. Finally, the results of a static test campaign carried out on six carbon-fiber reinforced high tensile strength concrete specimens. The proposed bone-shaped specimen shows a much higher percentage of successful failures than the other specimen geometries commonly used for tensile testing, which improves the quality of tensile characterization test campaigns for high and ultra-high tensile strength concretes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"10820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94471-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94471-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土抗拉强度的准确测定是一个越来越受关注的话题,特别是在新型超高抗拉强度纤维增强混凝土的推动下。然而,这是一项复杂的任务,因为传统方法提供的结果不一致(劈裂拉伸试验和三点弯曲试验)。最可靠的方法是直接拉伸试验。然而,具体来说,它提出了一个尚未得到圆满解决的技术挑战。本研究的目的是设计一个试样,最大限度地提高成功失败的百分比,并为负载应用设备提供可行的锚固解决方案,特别是对于高和超高抗拉强度混凝土。一个优化的几何形状的骨形标本,最大限度地崩溃的可能性发生在中央颈部提出。首先,给出了骨形试样母线的数学函数。对该溶液的性能进行了数值和统计分析,并与其他常用的直接拉伸试验溶液进行了比较。此外,设计,制造和校准一个定制万向接头的负载定心,从而最大限度地减少其偏心和分散的结果。最后,对6个碳纤维增强高抗拉强度混凝土试件进行了静力试验。所提出的骨形试样比通常用于拉伸测试的其他试样几何形状显示出更高的成功失败百分比,这提高了高和超高抗拉强度混凝土的拉伸特性测试活动的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical and experimental study of the optimal specimen geometry for direct tension strength tests in high tensile strength fiber reinforced concrete.

The accurate determination of the tensile strength of concrete is a topic of growing interest, especially driven by the new ultra-high tensile strength fiber-reinforced concretes. However, this is a complex task, as traditional methods provide inconsistent results (both splitting tensile test and 3-point bending test). The most robust method is the direct tensile test. However, in concrete, it poses a technical challenge that has not yet been satisfactorily solved. The aim of this study is the design of a test specimen that maximizes the percentage of successful failure and also allows a viable anchorage solution to the load application equipment, especially for high and ultra-high tensile strength concretes. An optimized geometry of a bone-shaped specimen that maximizes the probability of collapse occurring at the central neck is presented. First, a mathematical function of the generatrix of the bone-shape specimen is presented. The behavior of the solution is also analyzed numerically and statistically, comparing it with other commonly used solutions for direct tensile tests. Additionally, the design, fabrication, and calibration of a tailored cardan joint for load centering, thus minimizing its eccentricity and the dispersion of the results. Finally, the results of a static test campaign carried out on six carbon-fiber reinforced high tensile strength concrete specimens. The proposed bone-shaped specimen shows a much higher percentage of successful failures than the other specimen geometries commonly used for tensile testing, which improves the quality of tensile characterization test campaigns for high and ultra-high tensile strength concretes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信