重症SARS-CoV-2 α变异恢复期患者的T细胞免疫反应较轻重症患者差。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chih-Yao Hsu, Chun-Hsiang Chiu, Te-Yu Lin, Feng-Yee Chang
{"title":"重症SARS-CoV-2 α变异恢复期患者的T细胞免疫反应较轻重症患者差。","authors":"Chih-Yao Hsu, Chun-Hsiang Chiu, Te-Yu Lin, Feng-Yee Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess T cell phenotype and the role of cellular immunity against acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants in alpha variant coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and ten healthy controls were enrolled. T cell subsets in peripheral blood were classified and quantified using flow cytometry. Additionally, T cell immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide pools were assessed. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using Cytobank software. Other analyses involved Student's t-test or chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CD127 expression on T helper cells and cytotoxic T cells was lower in the severe disease group than that in the mild disease group. Severe COVID-19 convalescents with SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant exhibited poorer T cell immune responses than those with mild disease upon spike peptide pools stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 wild type, alpha, or omicron variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 convalescents showed T helper and cytotoxic T cells with lower CD127 expression in the severe disease group than those in the mild disease group. Severe COVID-19 convalescents infected with the alpha variant exhibited poorer T cell immune responses against the SARS-CoV-2 wild type, alpha, or omicron variants. Our study provides insights into the differences in T cell phenotypes and immune responses during the contraction phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection across varying disease severities. These findings offer valuable perspectives for advancing future research on SARS-CoV-2 T cell-related immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant convalescent patients exhibit worse T cell immune response than those with mild severity disease.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Yao Hsu, Chun-Hsiang Chiu, Te-Yu Lin, Feng-Yee Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess T cell phenotype and the role of cellular immunity against acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants in alpha variant coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and ten healthy controls were enrolled. T cell subsets in peripheral blood were classified and quantified using flow cytometry. Additionally, T cell immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide pools were assessed. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using Cytobank software. Other analyses involved Student's t-test or chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CD127 expression on T helper cells and cytotoxic T cells was lower in the severe disease group than that in the mild disease group. Severe COVID-19 convalescents with SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant exhibited poorer T cell immune responses than those with mild disease upon spike peptide pools stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 wild type, alpha, or omicron variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 convalescents showed T helper and cytotoxic T cells with lower CD127 expression in the severe disease group than those in the mild disease group. Severe COVID-19 convalescents infected with the alpha variant exhibited poorer T cell immune responses against the SARS-CoV-2 wild type, alpha, or omicron variants. Our study provides insights into the differences in T cell phenotypes and immune responses during the contraction phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection across varying disease severities. These findings offer valuable perspectives for advancing future research on SARS-CoV-2 T cell-related immune responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.03.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估α变异冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)恢复期患者的T细胞表型和细胞免疫对急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)变异的作用。方法:选取32例SARS-CoV-2确诊患者和10例健康对照。采用流式细胞术对外周血T细胞亚群进行分类和定量。此外,还评估了T细胞对SARS-CoV-2尖峰肽池的免疫反应。流式细胞术数据分析使用Cytobank软件。其他分析包括学生t检验或卡方检验。结果:重症组T辅助细胞和细胞毒性T细胞的CD127表达低于轻症组。在SARS-CoV-2野生型、α型或组粒变异的刺突肽池刺激下,带有SARS-CoV-2 α变异的重症COVID-19恢复期患者的T细胞免疫反应较轻。结论:新冠肺炎恢复期重症组辅助T细胞和细胞毒性T细胞CD127表达低于轻症组。感染α变异的严重COVID-19恢复期患者对SARS-CoV-2野生型、α或组粒变异表现出较差的T细胞免疫反应。我们的研究揭示了不同疾病严重程度的SARS-CoV-2感染后收缩期T细胞表型和免疫反应的差异。这些发现为推进未来SARS-CoV-2 T细胞相关免疫反应的研究提供了有价值的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severe SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant convalescent patients exhibit worse T cell immune response than those with mild severity disease.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess T cell phenotype and the role of cellular immunity against acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants in alpha variant coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent patients.

Methods: Thirty-two confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and ten healthy controls were enrolled. T cell subsets in peripheral blood were classified and quantified using flow cytometry. Additionally, T cell immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide pools were assessed. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using Cytobank software. Other analyses involved Student's t-test or chi-square test.

Results: CD127 expression on T helper cells and cytotoxic T cells was lower in the severe disease group than that in the mild disease group. Severe COVID-19 convalescents with SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant exhibited poorer T cell immune responses than those with mild disease upon spike peptide pools stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 wild type, alpha, or omicron variants.

Conclusions: COVID-19 convalescents showed T helper and cytotoxic T cells with lower CD127 expression in the severe disease group than those in the mild disease group. Severe COVID-19 convalescents infected with the alpha variant exhibited poorer T cell immune responses against the SARS-CoV-2 wild type, alpha, or omicron variants. Our study provides insights into the differences in T cell phenotypes and immune responses during the contraction phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection across varying disease severities. These findings offer valuable perspectives for advancing future research on SARS-CoV-2 T cell-related immune responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信