Shubhima Grover, Hara Prasad Mishra, Rachna Gupta, Lalit K Gupta
{"title":"远程监测和家庭血压监测对高血压成人血压降低的影响:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Shubhima Grover, Hara Prasad Mishra, Rachna Gupta, Lalit K Gupta","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Telemonitoring and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) are becoming popular approaches for managing hypertension. They are believed to improve patient compliance as compared to the usual care monitoring. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to compare blood pressure (BP) reduction following telemonitoring, HBPM and usual care BP monitoring approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and clinicaltrial.gov were searched till 15 May 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring, HBPM and usual care monitoring for reduction in BP and the postintervention BP in hypertensive adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A network meta-analysis with 24 RCTs was performed using MetaInsight. Telemonitoring produced a significantly greater reduction in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-3.69 mmHg [95% CI -5.82; -1.57, P < 0.001]) and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-1.82 mmHg [95% CI -2.98 to -0.67, P < 0.001]) as compared to the usual care monitoring. Home BP monitoring also produced a greater lowering of SBP (-2.73 mmHg [95% CI -5.69 to 0.22, P = 0.069]) and DBP (-2.09 mm Hg [95% CI -3.66 to -0.52, P < 0.001]) than usual care, with a significant reduction in the DBP alone. The postintervention SBP and DBP were also lower in the telemonitoring and the HBPM groups than the usual care group. However, there was no significant difference between the SBP and the DBP reductions in the telemonitoring and the HBPM groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemonitoring and HBPM may be more useful in controlling BP as compared to usual care management alone. However, more direct studies comparing telemonitoring with HBPM are needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1091-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of telemonitoring and home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure reduction in hypertensive adults: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shubhima Grover, Hara Prasad Mishra, Rachna Gupta, Lalit K Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Telemonitoring and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) are becoming popular approaches for managing hypertension. They are believed to improve patient compliance as compared to the usual care monitoring. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to compare blood pressure (BP) reduction following telemonitoring, HBPM and usual care BP monitoring approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and clinicaltrial.gov were searched till 15 May 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring, HBPM and usual care monitoring for reduction in BP and the postintervention BP in hypertensive adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A network meta-analysis with 24 RCTs was performed using MetaInsight. Telemonitoring produced a significantly greater reduction in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-3.69 mmHg [95% CI -5.82; -1.57, P < 0.001]) and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-1.82 mmHg [95% CI -2.98 to -0.67, P < 0.001]) as compared to the usual care monitoring. Home BP monitoring also produced a greater lowering of SBP (-2.73 mmHg [95% CI -5.69 to 0.22, P = 0.069]) and DBP (-2.09 mm Hg [95% CI -3.66 to -0.52, P < 0.001]) than usual care, with a significant reduction in the DBP alone. The postintervention SBP and DBP were also lower in the telemonitoring and the HBPM groups than the usual care group. However, there was no significant difference between the SBP and the DBP reductions in the telemonitoring and the HBPM groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemonitoring and HBPM may be more useful in controlling BP as compared to usual care management alone. However, more direct studies comparing telemonitoring with HBPM are needed in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1091-1098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
远程监测和家庭血压监测(HBPM)正在成为管理高血压的流行方法。与常规护理监测相比,它们被认为能提高患者的依从性。该网络荟萃分析比较了远程监测、HBPM和常规监护血压监测方法后血压(BP)的降低。方法:截至2024年5月15日,检索PubMed和clinicaltrial.gov,比较远程监测、HBPM和常规监护监测对高血压成人血压降低和干预后血压降低的随机对照试验(rct)。结果:使用MetaInsight进行了24项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。远程监测显著降低了收缩压(SBP) (-3.69 mmHg [95% CI -5.82;结论:与常规护理管理相比,远程监护和HBPM在控制血压方面可能更有用。然而,未来需要更多的比较远程监护与HBPM的直接研究。
Effect of telemonitoring and home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure reduction in hypertensive adults: a network meta-analysis.
Introduction: Telemonitoring and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) are becoming popular approaches for managing hypertension. They are believed to improve patient compliance as compared to the usual care monitoring. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to compare blood pressure (BP) reduction following telemonitoring, HBPM and usual care BP monitoring approaches.
Methods: PubMed and clinicaltrial.gov were searched till 15 May 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring, HBPM and usual care monitoring for reduction in BP and the postintervention BP in hypertensive adults.
Results: A network meta-analysis with 24 RCTs was performed using MetaInsight. Telemonitoring produced a significantly greater reduction in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-3.69 mmHg [95% CI -5.82; -1.57, P < 0.001]) and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-1.82 mmHg [95% CI -2.98 to -0.67, P < 0.001]) as compared to the usual care monitoring. Home BP monitoring also produced a greater lowering of SBP (-2.73 mmHg [95% CI -5.69 to 0.22, P = 0.069]) and DBP (-2.09 mm Hg [95% CI -3.66 to -0.52, P < 0.001]) than usual care, with a significant reduction in the DBP alone. The postintervention SBP and DBP were also lower in the telemonitoring and the HBPM groups than the usual care group. However, there was no significant difference between the SBP and the DBP reductions in the telemonitoring and the HBPM groups.
Conclusion: Telemonitoring and HBPM may be more useful in controlling BP as compared to usual care management alone. However, more direct studies comparing telemonitoring with HBPM are needed in the future.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.