{"title":"不同类型块填料复合材料的聚合收缩率、显微硬度和固化深度的评价。","authors":"Sergen Özdemir, İlker Ayaz, Nurgül Çetin Tuncer, Çağatay Barutçugil, Ayşe Dündar","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to quantify polymerization shrinkage, microhardness, and depth of cure of different types of bulk-fill composites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six bulk-fill composites were tested: SonicFill 2 (SCF), VisCalor (VVC), Admira Fusion x-tra (AFX), Filtek Bulk Fill (FBF), Fill-Up! (FUP) and GrandioSO Heavy Flow (GHF). Sixty teeth were divided into twelve groups (n = 5) according to the composite and the irradiation level applied (standard or high). Each tooth was subjected to three scans using a micro-computed tomography device. The microhardness of the composite specimens was measured using a Vickers hardness tester. Depth of cure analysis was performed by measuring the microhardness of the composites at 0.5 mm intervals from the top surface to the bottom surface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest volumetric shrinkage was found in the AFX group when polymerized at standard irradiance. After curing, the AFX group showed the highest void ratio. Increasing irradiance significantly increased volumetric shrinkage and void ratio only in the SCF group (p < 0.05). GHF achieved the maximum microhardness value of 80% at the lowest curing depth of 2.9 mm, while VVC, AFX, and SCF showed a curing depth of more than 5 mm (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high irradiance caused the most significant volumetric shrinkage and void ratio in the SCF group. Only the FUP and GHF groups were unable to achieve the desired curing depth of 4 mm.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Irradiance, material types, and thickness are important factors in the polymerization of composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage, Microhardness, and Depth of Cure of Different Types of Bulk-Fill Composites.\",\"authors\":\"Sergen Özdemir, İlker Ayaz, Nurgül Çetin Tuncer, Çağatay Barutçugil, Ayşe Dündar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to quantify polymerization shrinkage, microhardness, and depth of cure of different types of bulk-fill composites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six bulk-fill composites were tested: SonicFill 2 (SCF), VisCalor (VVC), Admira Fusion x-tra (AFX), Filtek Bulk Fill (FBF), Fill-Up! (FUP) and GrandioSO Heavy Flow (GHF). Sixty teeth were divided into twelve groups (n = 5) according to the composite and the irradiation level applied (standard or high). Each tooth was subjected to three scans using a micro-computed tomography device. The microhardness of the composite specimens was measured using a Vickers hardness tester. Depth of cure analysis was performed by measuring the microhardness of the composites at 0.5 mm intervals from the top surface to the bottom surface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest volumetric shrinkage was found in the AFX group when polymerized at standard irradiance. After curing, the AFX group showed the highest void ratio. Increasing irradiance significantly increased volumetric shrinkage and void ratio only in the SCF group (p < 0.05). GHF achieved the maximum microhardness value of 80% at the lowest curing depth of 2.9 mm, while VVC, AFX, and SCF showed a curing depth of more than 5 mm (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high irradiance caused the most significant volumetric shrinkage and void ratio in the SCF group. Only the FUP and GHF groups were unable to achieve the desired curing depth of 4 mm.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Irradiance, material types, and thickness are important factors in the polymerization of composites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究不同类型的块体填充复合材料的聚合收缩率、显微硬度和固化深度。方法:测试了6种大块填充复合材料:SonicFill 2 (SCF)、VisCalor (VVC)、Admira Fusion x-tra (AFX)、Filtek Bulk Fill (FBF)、Fill- up !(FUP)和大流量(GHF)。60颗牙根据复合材料及辐照水平(标准或高)分为12组(n = 5)。使用微型计算机断层扫描设备对每颗牙齿进行三次扫描。采用维氏硬度计测定复合材料的显微硬度。固化深度分析是通过测量复合材料从上表面到下表面间隔0.5 mm的显微硬度来进行的。结果:AFX组在标准辐照度下聚合时体积收缩率最高。固化后,AFX组孔隙率最高。结论:高辐照度导致SCF组的体积收缩率和空隙率最显著。只有FUP和GHF组无法达到理想的4 mm的固化深度。临床相关性:辐照度、材料类型和厚度是复合材料聚合的重要因素。
Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage, Microhardness, and Depth of Cure of Different Types of Bulk-Fill Composites.
Objectives: This study aimed to quantify polymerization shrinkage, microhardness, and depth of cure of different types of bulk-fill composites.
Methods: Six bulk-fill composites were tested: SonicFill 2 (SCF), VisCalor (VVC), Admira Fusion x-tra (AFX), Filtek Bulk Fill (FBF), Fill-Up! (FUP) and GrandioSO Heavy Flow (GHF). Sixty teeth were divided into twelve groups (n = 5) according to the composite and the irradiation level applied (standard or high). Each tooth was subjected to three scans using a micro-computed tomography device. The microhardness of the composite specimens was measured using a Vickers hardness tester. Depth of cure analysis was performed by measuring the microhardness of the composites at 0.5 mm intervals from the top surface to the bottom surface.
Results: The highest volumetric shrinkage was found in the AFX group when polymerized at standard irradiance. After curing, the AFX group showed the highest void ratio. Increasing irradiance significantly increased volumetric shrinkage and void ratio only in the SCF group (p < 0.05). GHF achieved the maximum microhardness value of 80% at the lowest curing depth of 2.9 mm, while VVC, AFX, and SCF showed a curing depth of more than 5 mm (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The high irradiance caused the most significant volumetric shrinkage and void ratio in the SCF group. Only the FUP and GHF groups were unable to achieve the desired curing depth of 4 mm.
Clinical relevance: Irradiance, material types, and thickness are important factors in the polymerization of composites.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics