慢性硬膜下血肿单次脑膜中动脉栓塞及手术引流。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Andrew B Koo, Sasha Stogniy, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Sidharth S Menon, Daniela Renedo, Benjamin Reeves, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Ryan Hebert, Adam de Havenon, Kevin N Sheth, Charles Matouk
{"title":"慢性硬膜下血肿单次脑膜中动脉栓塞及手术引流。","authors":"Andrew B Koo, Sasha Stogniy, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Sidharth S Menon, Daniela Renedo, Benjamin Reeves, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Ryan Hebert, Adam de Havenon, Kevin N Sheth, Charles Matouk","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary experience of a combined middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and burr hole evacuation approach for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) under a single anesthesia session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent MMAE and burr hole surgery during the same admission at a single major academic institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients were dichotomized by those with both procedures performed under a single anesthesia session (combined) or two separate sessions (separate). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and complications were compared. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day complication and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>103 patients were included in the study (median age 74 (67-81) years), with 33.9% in the combined cohort. Demographics, comorbidities, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the cohorts. While cumulative procedure times were similar (separate 85 (71-110) min vs combined 96 (82-127) min), total anesthesia time was significantly longer for patients with separate procedures (separate 225 (193-264) min vs combined 165 (145-183) min, P<0.001). There were no differences in the rates of access site complications, reoperation, stroke, or mortality between the cohorts. The combined cohort trended to have shorter length of stay (separate 6 (5-8) days vs combined 5 (4-7) days, P=0.058). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that MMAE performed under a single anesthesia session with burr hole evacuation surgery is a safe and potentially resource-efficient approach for the management of cSDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-session middle meningeal artery embolization and surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B Koo, Sasha Stogniy, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Sidharth S Menon, Daniela Renedo, Benjamin Reeves, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Ryan Hebert, Adam de Havenon, Kevin N Sheth, Charles Matouk\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2025-023372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary experience of a combined middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and burr hole evacuation approach for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) under a single anesthesia session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent MMAE and burr hole surgery during the same admission at a single major academic institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients were dichotomized by those with both procedures performed under a single anesthesia session (combined) or two separate sessions (separate). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and complications were compared. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day complication and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>103 patients were included in the study (median age 74 (67-81) years), with 33.9% in the combined cohort. Demographics, comorbidities, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the cohorts. While cumulative procedure times were similar (separate 85 (71-110) min vs combined 96 (82-127) min), total anesthesia time was significantly longer for patients with separate procedures (separate 225 (193-264) min vs combined 165 (145-183) min, P<0.001). There were no differences in the rates of access site complications, reoperation, stroke, or mortality between the cohorts. The combined cohort trended to have shorter length of stay (separate 6 (5-8) days vs combined 5 (4-7) days, P=0.058). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that MMAE performed under a single anesthesia session with burr hole evacuation surgery is a safe and potentially resource-efficient approach for the management of cSDH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023372\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估单次麻醉下联合脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)和钻孔引流入路治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)的初步经验。方法:我们对2019年至2024年在同一家主要学术机构同一次住院期间接受MMAE和钻孔手术的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。患者被分为在单一麻醉阶段(联合麻醉)或两个单独麻醉阶段(单独麻醉)下进行两种手术的患者。比较基线人口统计学、合并症和并发症。主要结局为住院和90天并发症及再手术率。结果:103例患者纳入研究(中位年龄74(67-81)岁),其中33.9%为联合队列。人口统计学、合并症和影像学特征在队列之间相似。虽然累积手术时间相似(单独手术85 (71-110)min vs联合手术96 (82-127)min),但单独手术患者的总麻醉时间明显更长(单独手术225 (193-264)min vs联合手术165 (145-183)min)。结论:本研究结果表明,MMAE在单次麻醉下进行钻孔抽吸手术是治疗cSDH的一种安全且具有潜在资源效率的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-session middle meningeal artery embolization and surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary experience of a combined middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and burr hole evacuation approach for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) under a single anesthesia session.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent MMAE and burr hole surgery during the same admission at a single major academic institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients were dichotomized by those with both procedures performed under a single anesthesia session (combined) or two separate sessions (separate). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and complications were compared. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day complication and reoperation rates.

Results: 103 patients were included in the study (median age 74 (67-81) years), with 33.9% in the combined cohort. Demographics, comorbidities, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the cohorts. While cumulative procedure times were similar (separate 85 (71-110) min vs combined 96 (82-127) min), total anesthesia time was significantly longer for patients with separate procedures (separate 225 (193-264) min vs combined 165 (145-183) min, P<0.001). There were no differences in the rates of access site complications, reoperation, stroke, or mortality between the cohorts. The combined cohort trended to have shorter length of stay (separate 6 (5-8) days vs combined 5 (4-7) days, P=0.058). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates within 90 days.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that MMAE performed under a single anesthesia session with burr hole evacuation surgery is a safe and potentially resource-efficient approach for the management of cSDH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信