分娩的虚拟现实模拟训练:一项聚类随机交叉研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Arundhati Gosavi, Abhiram Kanneganti, Eng Tat Khoo, Kuldip Singh, Liang Shen, Mary Rauff, Chang Liu, Mahesh Choolani
{"title":"分娩的虚拟现实模拟训练:一项聚类随机交叉研究。","authors":"Arundhati Gosavi, Abhiram Kanneganti, Eng Tat Khoo, Kuldip Singh, Liang Shen, Mary Rauff, Chang Liu, Mahesh Choolani","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare knowledge acquisition and domain-specific feedback between virtual reality (VR) and mannequin-based simulation for teaching medical students normal vaginal delivery (NVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cluster randomized crossover study comparing a novel in-house-developed NVD VR simulator utilizing an Oculus® Quest 2 HMD with the PROMPT Flex® mannequin. We randomly assigned medical student clinical groups to either VR or mannequin simulation. Participants took an 11-item knowledge quiz before and after their first simulation before crossing over to the alternate simulation. Participants took a six-domain, 14-item feedback questionnaire evaluating both simulations. The primary outcome was percentage improvement in knowledge scores, while the secondary outcome was adjusted mean difference in mean feedback scores between each simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty clinical groups comprising 111 medical students participated. There was no difference in either arm for baseline characteristics and pre-simulation knowledge scores. Medical students undergoing VR simulation had significantly higher overall post-simulation mean percentage correct scores (79.0% vs. 54.0%; P < 0.001). The mannequin simulator had significantly higher feedback scores (61.0 vs. 58.3; adjusted mean difference 2.45 [95% confidence interval 0.95-3.95]; P = 0.002) and in five of six domains. A total of 40.5% of respondents preferred the mannequin simulation, 4.5% preferred the VR simulation, and 42.5% preferred a mixture of the two.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel VR NVD simulator was superior to traditional mannequin simulation in content delivery. As more respondents preferred a mixed approach over any single method, VR simulation could complement legacy mannequin simulation methods by serving as a primer or a distance-learning tool and help increase skill birth attendant training.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality simulation training for childbirth: A cluster randomized crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Arundhati Gosavi, Abhiram Kanneganti, Eng Tat Khoo, Kuldip Singh, Liang Shen, Mary Rauff, Chang Liu, Mahesh Choolani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare knowledge acquisition and domain-specific feedback between virtual reality (VR) and mannequin-based simulation for teaching medical students normal vaginal delivery (NVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cluster randomized crossover study comparing a novel in-house-developed NVD VR simulator utilizing an Oculus® Quest 2 HMD with the PROMPT Flex® mannequin. We randomly assigned medical student clinical groups to either VR or mannequin simulation. Participants took an 11-item knowledge quiz before and after their first simulation before crossing over to the alternate simulation. Participants took a six-domain, 14-item feedback questionnaire evaluating both simulations. The primary outcome was percentage improvement in knowledge scores, while the secondary outcome was adjusted mean difference in mean feedback scores between each simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty clinical groups comprising 111 medical students participated. There was no difference in either arm for baseline characteristics and pre-simulation knowledge scores. Medical students undergoing VR simulation had significantly higher overall post-simulation mean percentage correct scores (79.0% vs. 54.0%; P < 0.001). The mannequin simulator had significantly higher feedback scores (61.0 vs. 58.3; adjusted mean difference 2.45 [95% confidence interval 0.95-3.95]; P = 0.002) and in five of six domains. A total of 40.5% of respondents preferred the mannequin simulation, 4.5% preferred the VR simulation, and 42.5% preferred a mixture of the two.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel VR NVD simulator was superior to traditional mannequin simulation in content delivery. As more respondents preferred a mixed approach over any single method, VR simulation could complement legacy mannequin simulation methods by serving as a primer or a distance-learning tool and help increase skill birth attendant training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70053\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较虚拟现实(VR)与基于人体模型的模拟在医学生阴道正常分娩(NVD)教学中的知识获取和特定领域反馈。方法:我们进行了一项集群随机交叉研究,比较了使用Oculus®Quest 2 HMD的新型内部开发的NVD VR模拟器和PROMPT Flex®人体模型。我们随机分配医学生临床组进行虚拟现实或人体模型模拟。在进入另一个模拟之前,参与者在第一个模拟之前和之后都做了一个11项的知识测试。参与者填写了一份包含6个领域、14个项目的反馈问卷,对两种模拟进行评估。主要结果是知识得分的百分比改善,而次要结果是每次模拟之间平均反馈得分的调整平均差异。结果:共有20个临床组111名医学生参与。两组的基线特征和模拟前知识得分均无差异。接受VR模拟的医学生在整体模拟后的平均正确率得分显著更高(79.0% vs. 54.0%;结论:我们的新型VR NVD模拟器在内容传递方面优于传统的人体模拟。随着越来越多的受访者喜欢混合方法而不是任何单一方法,VR模拟可以作为入门或远程学习工具来补充传统的模型模拟方法,并有助于提高助产士的技能培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual reality simulation training for childbirth: A cluster randomized crossover study.

Objective: To compare knowledge acquisition and domain-specific feedback between virtual reality (VR) and mannequin-based simulation for teaching medical students normal vaginal delivery (NVD).

Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized crossover study comparing a novel in-house-developed NVD VR simulator utilizing an Oculus® Quest 2 HMD with the PROMPT Flex® mannequin. We randomly assigned medical student clinical groups to either VR or mannequin simulation. Participants took an 11-item knowledge quiz before and after their first simulation before crossing over to the alternate simulation. Participants took a six-domain, 14-item feedback questionnaire evaluating both simulations. The primary outcome was percentage improvement in knowledge scores, while the secondary outcome was adjusted mean difference in mean feedback scores between each simulation.

Results: Twenty clinical groups comprising 111 medical students participated. There was no difference in either arm for baseline characteristics and pre-simulation knowledge scores. Medical students undergoing VR simulation had significantly higher overall post-simulation mean percentage correct scores (79.0% vs. 54.0%; P < 0.001). The mannequin simulator had significantly higher feedback scores (61.0 vs. 58.3; adjusted mean difference 2.45 [95% confidence interval 0.95-3.95]; P = 0.002) and in five of six domains. A total of 40.5% of respondents preferred the mannequin simulation, 4.5% preferred the VR simulation, and 42.5% preferred a mixture of the two.

Conclusions: Our novel VR NVD simulator was superior to traditional mannequin simulation in content delivery. As more respondents preferred a mixed approach over any single method, VR simulation could complement legacy mannequin simulation methods by serving as a primer or a distance-learning tool and help increase skill birth attendant training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信