对非流行地区接受泊沙康唑和苯并咪唑治疗的南美锥虫病患者进行长期随访:CHAGASAZOL队列。

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina
{"title":"对非流行地区接受泊沙康唑和苯并咪唑治疗的南美锥虫病患者进行长期随访:CHAGASAZOL队列。","authors":"Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term follow-up of individuals with Chagas disease treated with posaconazole and benznidazole in a non-endemic region: the CHAGASAZOL cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较泊沙康唑和苯并硝唑治疗慢性恰加斯病的疗效。与苯并硝唑相比,波沙康唑的qPCR短期疗效较差,但很少有研究报道使用该工具进行长期随访。本研究的目的是通过11年的随访,对CHAGASAZOL队列提供更全面的分析。方法:这是一个纳入CHAGASAZOL试验的个体的前瞻性观察队列。截至2023年12月31日,数据已被审查。最初用泊沙康唑治疗且qPCR阳性的受试者再用苯并硝唑治疗。所有患者每隔6个月或1年进行一次临床和心电图评估以及qPCR。主要目标是寄生虫学失败,定义为在随访期间的任何时间外周血中出现任何qPCR阳性。结果:72名参与者入组(中位随访:71个月,范围1-147)。基线时,59例(82%)为不确定型,9例(12%)为心脏型,2例(3%)为消化型,2例(3%)为混合型。48名受试者接受泊沙康唑治疗,其中45名完成了至少一次随访。高达43/45例(95%)qPCR阳性,其中35例接受苯并硝唑治疗。考虑到使用苯并硝唑治疗(无论是首次治疗还是再次治疗)的患者,只有3/51(6%)的qPCR阳性。4名(5.5%)参与者在随访3 - 10年后出现心脏进展,每100人年的发生率为0.94。2例患者接受完整的苯并硝唑治疗,1例患者部分治疗(17天),1例患者仅接受泊沙康唑治疗后才出现临床进展。结论:即使苯并硝唑具有寄生虫学上的疗效,也应对CD患者进行终身随访,因为在诊断和治疗多年后,寄生虫学上的失败和临床进展都可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term follow-up of individuals with Chagas disease treated with posaconazole and benznidazole in a non-endemic region: the CHAGASAZOL cohort.

Objectives: The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.

Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.

Results: Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.

Conclusion: Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信