SAMPL准则的实施:关于改进生物医学期刊统计报告的建议。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Michal Ordak
{"title":"SAMPL准则的实施:关于改进生物医学期刊统计报告的建议。","authors":"Michal Ordak","doi":"10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of statistical reporting in biomedical journals remains insufficient despite the introduction of SAMPL guidelines in 2015. These guidelines aim to improve clarity and accuracy but are underutilised by authors and editorial boards. Common deficiencies include unclear descriptions of statistical test purposes, inadequate reporting of effect sizes, poor analysis of assumptions, and limited consideration of outliers. Addressing these challenges requires broader adoption of SAMPL recommendations, improved statistical literacy among researchers and editors, and stronger editorial oversight. To enhance transparency and reliability in biomedical research, the SAMPL guidelines should become standard practice, supported by targeted training and clear guidance for authors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10492,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100304"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of SAMPL guidelines: Recommendations for improving statistical reporting in biomedical journals.\",\"authors\":\"Michal Ordak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The quality of statistical reporting in biomedical journals remains insufficient despite the introduction of SAMPL guidelines in 2015. These guidelines aim to improve clarity and accuracy but are underutilised by authors and editorial boards. Common deficiencies include unclear descriptions of statistical test purposes, inadequate reporting of effect sizes, poor analysis of assumptions, and limited consideration of outliers. Addressing these challenges requires broader adoption of SAMPL recommendations, improved statistical literacy among researchers and editors, and stronger editorial oversight. To enhance transparency and reliability in biomedical research, the SAMPL guidelines should become standard practice, supported by targeted training and clear guidance for authors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管2015年引入了SAMPL指南,但生物医学期刊的统计报告质量仍然不足。这些准则旨在提高清晰度和准确性,但作者和编辑委员会没有充分利用这些准则。常见的缺陷包括统计检验目的描述不清、效应大小报告不足、假设分析不佳以及对异常值的考虑有限。应对这些挑战需要更广泛地采用SAMPL建议,提高研究人员和编辑的统计素养,并加强编辑监督。为了提高生物医学研究的透明度和可靠性,SAMPL指南应该成为标准做法,并为作者提供有针对性的培训和明确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of SAMPL guidelines: Recommendations for improving statistical reporting in biomedical journals.

The quality of statistical reporting in biomedical journals remains insufficient despite the introduction of SAMPL guidelines in 2015. These guidelines aim to improve clarity and accuracy but are underutilised by authors and editorial boards. Common deficiencies include unclear descriptions of statistical test purposes, inadequate reporting of effect sizes, poor analysis of assumptions, and limited consideration of outliers. Addressing these challenges requires broader adoption of SAMPL recommendations, improved statistical literacy among researchers and editors, and stronger editorial oversight. To enhance transparency and reliability in biomedical research, the SAMPL guidelines should become standard practice, supported by targeted training and clear guidance for authors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine
Clinical Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine is aimed at practising physicians in the UK and overseas and has relevance to all those managing or working within the healthcare sector. Available in print and online, the journal seeks to encourage high standards of medical care by promoting good clinical practice through original research, review and comment. The journal also includes a dedicated continuing medical education (CME) section in each issue. This presents the latest advances in a chosen specialty, with self-assessment questions at the end of each topic enabling CPD accreditation to be acquired. ISSN: 1470-2118 E-ISSN: 1473-4893 Frequency: 6 issues per year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信