来自不同文化和语言背景的前列腺癌患者的护理和治疗结果模式:一项范围综述。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Current Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8
Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski
{"title":"来自不同文化和语言背景的前列腺癌患者的护理和治疗结果模式:一项范围综述。","authors":"Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Men from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds face challenges in accessing equitable and quality healthcare. However, little is known about the patterns of care among men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from CALD backgrounds. We aimed to map the available literature on patterns of care and treatment outcomes in men from CALD backgrounds who have PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Johanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We searched five bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Ovid Emcare) and grey literature. We explored patterns of PCa care extending from screening and early detection to end-of-life care and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,148 records were identified; 58 studies were included. Most studies were from the United States (US) (n = 41) and used ethnic origin (n = 14), nativity (n = 10), immigration history (n = 11), or country of birth (n = 13) as indicators of CALD. Most studies focused on screening and early detection for PCa (n = 37), specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Twelve papers were on PCa treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, and active surveillance), five on follow-up and supportive care, and four on treatment outcomes (i.e., change in measured PSA and PCa cancer-specific survival). There were disparities in the PCa care continuum and treatment outcomes between CALD and non-CALD patients. Factors influencing screening and early detection for PCa were systematically summarised and most addressed individual-level determinants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key findings from our scoping review emphasised the existence of guideline-discordant care, disparities in PCa screening test use, and differences in PCa treatment received among men from CALD backgrounds. However, little is known about patterns of care in diagnostic modalities, treatment phases, and palliative and end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"552-571"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes Among Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Men from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds face challenges in accessing equitable and quality healthcare. However, little is known about the patterns of care among men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from CALD backgrounds. We aimed to map the available literature on patterns of care and treatment outcomes in men from CALD backgrounds who have PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Johanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We searched five bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Ovid Emcare) and grey literature. We explored patterns of PCa care extending from screening and early detection to end-of-life care and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,148 records were identified; 58 studies were included. Most studies were from the United States (US) (n = 41) and used ethnic origin (n = 14), nativity (n = 10), immigration history (n = 11), or country of birth (n = 13) as indicators of CALD. Most studies focused on screening and early detection for PCa (n = 37), specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Twelve papers were on PCa treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, and active surveillance), five on follow-up and supportive care, and four on treatment outcomes (i.e., change in measured PSA and PCa cancer-specific survival). There were disparities in the PCa care continuum and treatment outcomes between CALD and non-CALD patients. Factors influencing screening and early detection for PCa were systematically summarised and most addressed individual-level determinants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key findings from our scoping review emphasised the existence of guideline-discordant care, disparities in PCa screening test use, and differences in PCa treatment received among men from CALD backgrounds. However, little is known about patterns of care in diagnostic modalities, treatment phases, and palliative and end-of-life care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"552-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自不同文化和语言背景(CALD)的男性在获得公平和高质量的医疗保健方面面临挑战。然而,对于来自CALD背景的前列腺癌(PCa)患者的护理模式知之甚少。我们的目的是绘制关于CALD背景的前列腺癌患者的护理模式和治疗结果的现有文献。方法:我们使用约翰娜布里格斯研究所的范围审查方法。我们检索了5个书目数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、SCOPUS、CINAHL和Ovid Emcare)和灰色文献。我们探讨了从筛查和早期发现到临终关怀和治疗结果的前列腺癌护理模式。结果:共识别7148条记录;纳入了58项研究。大多数研究来自美国(n = 41),使用种族出身(n = 14)、出生(n = 10)、移民史(n = 11)或出生国家(n = 13)作为CALD的指标。大多数研究集中于前列腺癌的筛查和早期检测(n = 37),特别是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测。12篇论文是关于前列腺癌的治疗(如手术、放射治疗和主动监测),5篇关于随访和支持治疗,4篇关于治疗结果(即测量的PSA和前列腺癌癌症特异性生存率的变化)。在CALD和非CALD患者之间,PCa护理连续性和治疗结果存在差异。系统总结了影响前列腺癌筛查和早期检测的因素,并讨论了大多数个人层面的决定因素。结论:我们的范围综述的主要发现强调了指南不一致护理的存在,前列腺癌筛查试验使用的差异,以及来自CALD背景的男性接受前列腺癌治疗的差异。然而,人们对诊断方式、治疗阶段、姑息治疗和临终关怀的护理模式知之甚少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes Among Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Men from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds face challenges in accessing equitable and quality healthcare. However, little is known about the patterns of care among men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from CALD backgrounds. We aimed to map the available literature on patterns of care and treatment outcomes in men from CALD backgrounds who have PCa.

Methods: We used the Johanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We searched five bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Ovid Emcare) and grey literature. We explored patterns of PCa care extending from screening and early detection to end-of-life care and treatment outcomes.

Results: A total of 7,148 records were identified; 58 studies were included. Most studies were from the United States (US) (n = 41) and used ethnic origin (n = 14), nativity (n = 10), immigration history (n = 11), or country of birth (n = 13) as indicators of CALD. Most studies focused on screening and early detection for PCa (n = 37), specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Twelve papers were on PCa treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, and active surveillance), five on follow-up and supportive care, and four on treatment outcomes (i.e., change in measured PSA and PCa cancer-specific survival). There were disparities in the PCa care continuum and treatment outcomes between CALD and non-CALD patients. Factors influencing screening and early detection for PCa were systematically summarised and most addressed individual-level determinants.

Conclusions: Key findings from our scoping review emphasised the existence of guideline-discordant care, disparities in PCa screening test use, and differences in PCa treatment received among men from CALD backgrounds. However, little is known about patterns of care in diagnostic modalities, treatment phases, and palliative and end-of-life care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信