Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski
{"title":"来自不同文化和语言背景的前列腺癌患者的护理和治疗结果模式:一项范围综述。","authors":"Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Men from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds face challenges in accessing equitable and quality healthcare. However, little is known about the patterns of care among men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from CALD backgrounds. We aimed to map the available literature on patterns of care and treatment outcomes in men from CALD backgrounds who have PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Johanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We searched five bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Ovid Emcare) and grey literature. We explored patterns of PCa care extending from screening and early detection to end-of-life care and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,148 records were identified; 58 studies were included. Most studies were from the United States (US) (n = 41) and used ethnic origin (n = 14), nativity (n = 10), immigration history (n = 11), or country of birth (n = 13) as indicators of CALD. Most studies focused on screening and early detection for PCa (n = 37), specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Twelve papers were on PCa treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, and active surveillance), five on follow-up and supportive care, and four on treatment outcomes (i.e., change in measured PSA and PCa cancer-specific survival). There were disparities in the PCa care continuum and treatment outcomes between CALD and non-CALD patients. Factors influencing screening and early detection for PCa were systematically summarised and most addressed individual-level determinants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key findings from our scoping review emphasised the existence of guideline-discordant care, disparities in PCa screening test use, and differences in PCa treatment received among men from CALD backgrounds. However, little is known about patterns of care in diagnostic modalities, treatment phases, and palliative and end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"552-571"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes Among Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Men from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds face challenges in accessing equitable and quality healthcare. However, little is known about the patterns of care among men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from CALD backgrounds. We aimed to map the available literature on patterns of care and treatment outcomes in men from CALD backgrounds who have PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Johanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We searched five bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Ovid Emcare) and grey literature. We explored patterns of PCa care extending from screening and early detection to end-of-life care and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,148 records were identified; 58 studies were included. Most studies were from the United States (US) (n = 41) and used ethnic origin (n = 14), nativity (n = 10), immigration history (n = 11), or country of birth (n = 13) as indicators of CALD. Most studies focused on screening and early detection for PCa (n = 37), specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Twelve papers were on PCa treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, and active surveillance), five on follow-up and supportive care, and four on treatment outcomes (i.e., change in measured PSA and PCa cancer-specific survival). There were disparities in the PCa care continuum and treatment outcomes between CALD and non-CALD patients. Factors influencing screening and early detection for PCa were systematically summarised and most addressed individual-level determinants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key findings from our scoping review emphasised the existence of guideline-discordant care, disparities in PCa screening test use, and differences in PCa treatment received among men from CALD backgrounds. However, little is known about patterns of care in diagnostic modalities, treatment phases, and palliative and end-of-life care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"552-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes Among Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review.
Introduction: Men from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds face challenges in accessing equitable and quality healthcare. However, little is known about the patterns of care among men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from CALD backgrounds. We aimed to map the available literature on patterns of care and treatment outcomes in men from CALD backgrounds who have PCa.
Methods: We used the Johanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We searched five bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Ovid Emcare) and grey literature. We explored patterns of PCa care extending from screening and early detection to end-of-life care and treatment outcomes.
Results: A total of 7,148 records were identified; 58 studies were included. Most studies were from the United States (US) (n = 41) and used ethnic origin (n = 14), nativity (n = 10), immigration history (n = 11), or country of birth (n = 13) as indicators of CALD. Most studies focused on screening and early detection for PCa (n = 37), specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Twelve papers were on PCa treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, and active surveillance), five on follow-up and supportive care, and four on treatment outcomes (i.e., change in measured PSA and PCa cancer-specific survival). There were disparities in the PCa care continuum and treatment outcomes between CALD and non-CALD patients. Factors influencing screening and early detection for PCa were systematically summarised and most addressed individual-level determinants.
Conclusions: Key findings from our scoping review emphasised the existence of guideline-discordant care, disparities in PCa screening test use, and differences in PCa treatment received among men from CALD backgrounds. However, little is known about patterns of care in diagnostic modalities, treatment phases, and palliative and end-of-life care.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.