肿瘤学放射科医师监测的改良吞钡检查的透视时间:一项为期3年的单机构回顾性研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Brinda R Korivi, Carla L Warneke, Mostafa A Shehata, Sheila Buoy, Xiaohui Tang, Madhavi Patnana, Sarah M Palmquist, Sanaz Javadi, Sonia Prithvi Rao, Ronald A Rauch, Mindy X Wang, Khaled M Elsayes, Katherine A Hutcheson
{"title":"肿瘤学放射科医师监测的改良吞钡检查的透视时间:一项为期3年的单机构回顾性研究。","authors":"Brinda R Korivi, Carla L Warneke, Mostafa A Shehata, Sheila Buoy, Xiaohui Tang, Madhavi Patnana, Sarah M Palmquist, Sanaz Javadi, Sonia Prithvi Rao, Ronald A Rauch, Mindy X Wang, Khaled M Elsayes, Katherine A Hutcheson","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10822-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluoroscopy time is an important metric for radiation safety, but how it is related to dysphagia severity as graded by Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) criteria and other factors in oncology practice is undocumented. We evaluated the fluoroscopy time for the bolus protocol used at the originating institution of the DIGEST method and assessed the relationship between fluoroscopy time and DIGEST grade, exam indication, and additional parameters. Eleven trials, including specified VARIBAR® barium volumes, were included in the standard bolus protocol. Electronic health record (EHR) 2018-2021 databases were sampled in a retrospective STARI-guided DIGEST implementation evaluation for clinically reported DIGEST grades in the EHR and matched to fluoroscopy time. The study sample included 4,162 modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations. Using generalized linear modeling, we tested log-transformed fluoroscopy time associations with Tukey's adjustment for multiple pairwise comparisons. MBS duration ranged from 0.16 to 11.80 min (Median 2.21, IQR 1.98). Fluoroscopy time was associated with exam indication, cancer diagnosis, setting, and DIGEST grade. Fluoroscopy times increased as the DIGEST severity grade worsened (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45, p < .0001). MBS indication was also associated with fluoroscopy time (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.12, p < .0001), with the shortest times for baseline exams and the longest for excluding leaks (Median1.6 vs. 3.5 min). Median fluoroscopy time was shorter among endocrine and metastatic cancer patients and longer among head and neck cancer patients (2 vs. 3 min, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02, p < .0001). Inpatient examinations were longer than outpatient (Median 3.1 vs. 2.2 min, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02, p < .0001). The bolus protocol was clinically acceptable within ALARA standards. Clinicians should be mindful of increased fluoroscopy time and optimize exams as clinically indicated in patients with severe dysphagia, leak exclusion, and inpatient studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoroscopy Time of Radiologist-Monitored Modified Barium Swallow Exams in Oncology: A 3-year Single Institution Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brinda R Korivi, Carla L Warneke, Mostafa A Shehata, Sheila Buoy, Xiaohui Tang, Madhavi Patnana, Sarah M Palmquist, Sanaz Javadi, Sonia Prithvi Rao, Ronald A Rauch, Mindy X Wang, Khaled M Elsayes, Katherine A Hutcheson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00455-025-10822-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fluoroscopy time is an important metric for radiation safety, but how it is related to dysphagia severity as graded by Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) criteria and other factors in oncology practice is undocumented. We evaluated the fluoroscopy time for the bolus protocol used at the originating institution of the DIGEST method and assessed the relationship between fluoroscopy time and DIGEST grade, exam indication, and additional parameters. Eleven trials, including specified VARIBAR® barium volumes, were included in the standard bolus protocol. Electronic health record (EHR) 2018-2021 databases were sampled in a retrospective STARI-guided DIGEST implementation evaluation for clinically reported DIGEST grades in the EHR and matched to fluoroscopy time. The study sample included 4,162 modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations. Using generalized linear modeling, we tested log-transformed fluoroscopy time associations with Tukey's adjustment for multiple pairwise comparisons. MBS duration ranged from 0.16 to 11.80 min (Median 2.21, IQR 1.98). Fluoroscopy time was associated with exam indication, cancer diagnosis, setting, and DIGEST grade. Fluoroscopy times increased as the DIGEST severity grade worsened (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45, p < .0001). MBS indication was also associated with fluoroscopy time (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.12, p < .0001), with the shortest times for baseline exams and the longest for excluding leaks (Median1.6 vs. 3.5 min). Median fluoroscopy time was shorter among endocrine and metastatic cancer patients and longer among head and neck cancer patients (2 vs. 3 min, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02, p < .0001). Inpatient examinations were longer than outpatient (Median 3.1 vs. 2.2 min, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02, p < .0001). The bolus protocol was clinically acceptable within ALARA standards. Clinicians should be mindful of increased fluoroscopy time and optimize exams as clinically indicated in patients with severe dysphagia, leak exclusion, and inpatient studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dysphagia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dysphagia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10822-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10822-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

透视时间是放射安全的重要指标,但在肿瘤实践中,它与吞咽毒性动态分级(DIGEST)标准评定的吞咽困难严重程度和其他因素之间的关系尚无文献记载。我们评估了在DIGEST方法的起源机构使用的丸方案的透视时间,并评估了透视时间与DIGEST分级、检查指征和其他参数之间的关系。11项试验,包括指定的VARIBAR®钡体积,被纳入标准丸剂方案。对电子健康记录(EHR) 2018-2021数据库进行回顾性stari指导下的DIGEST实施评估,以评估EHR中临床报告的DIGEST分级,并与透视时间相匹配。研究样本包括4162例改良吞钡(MBS)检查。使用广义线性模型,我们测试了对数变换透视时间与Tukey调整的多重两两比较。MBS持续时间从0.16到11.80分钟不等(中位数2.21,IQR 1.98)。透视时间与检查指征、癌症诊断、环境和消化道分级相关。x线检查次数随消化道严重程度加重而增加(R2 = 0.45, p 2 = 0.12, p 2 = 0.02, p 2 = 0.02, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluoroscopy Time of Radiologist-Monitored Modified Barium Swallow Exams in Oncology: A 3-year Single Institution Retrospective Study.

Fluoroscopy time is an important metric for radiation safety, but how it is related to dysphagia severity as graded by Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) criteria and other factors in oncology practice is undocumented. We evaluated the fluoroscopy time for the bolus protocol used at the originating institution of the DIGEST method and assessed the relationship between fluoroscopy time and DIGEST grade, exam indication, and additional parameters. Eleven trials, including specified VARIBAR® barium volumes, were included in the standard bolus protocol. Electronic health record (EHR) 2018-2021 databases were sampled in a retrospective STARI-guided DIGEST implementation evaluation for clinically reported DIGEST grades in the EHR and matched to fluoroscopy time. The study sample included 4,162 modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations. Using generalized linear modeling, we tested log-transformed fluoroscopy time associations with Tukey's adjustment for multiple pairwise comparisons. MBS duration ranged from 0.16 to 11.80 min (Median 2.21, IQR 1.98). Fluoroscopy time was associated with exam indication, cancer diagnosis, setting, and DIGEST grade. Fluoroscopy times increased as the DIGEST severity grade worsened (R2 = 0.45, p < .0001). MBS indication was also associated with fluoroscopy time (R2 = 0.12, p < .0001), with the shortest times for baseline exams and the longest for excluding leaks (Median1.6 vs. 3.5 min). Median fluoroscopy time was shorter among endocrine and metastatic cancer patients and longer among head and neck cancer patients (2 vs. 3 min, R2 = 0.02, p < .0001). Inpatient examinations were longer than outpatient (Median 3.1 vs. 2.2 min, R2 = 0.02, p < .0001). The bolus protocol was clinically acceptable within ALARA standards. Clinicians should be mindful of increased fluoroscopy time and optimize exams as clinically indicated in patients with severe dysphagia, leak exclusion, and inpatient studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信