急诊科导航员干预措施和结果措施:范围审查

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kathleen Parry, Christopher Picard, Rashmi Devkota, Kaitlyn Tate
{"title":"急诊科导航员干预措施和结果措施:范围审查","authors":"Kathleen Parry,&nbsp;Christopher Picard,&nbsp;Rashmi Devkota,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Tate","doi":"10.1111/opn.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency department (ED) patient navigators are increasingly used, but a lack of understanding of how ED navigator interventions are designed, described, and evaluated creates gaps in our ability to understand, monitor and improve care. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify how the literature describes and evaluates ED patient navigator interventions for older people transitioning to a primary care setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review was conducted following the Johanna Briggs Institute updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. We searched three databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. We included English language articles without any restrictions on study designs that two reviewers screened. All articles focused on distinct ED navigator roles to facilitate transitions for older people from the ED to primary care were included. Data extraction was completed by the primary reviewer and validated by two secondary reviewers. We report study characteristics in a table. Descriptive content analysis was used to analyse the main findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 10 studies were included out of 2102 articles identified. All studies used quantitative designs except one, which used a qualitative research design. Four studies were conducted in the United States, two in Australia and the UK and one in Canada and Belgium. Twenty unique outcome measures were identified, with hospital admission rate, frequency of ED presentations and ED/hospital length of stay being the most common. We identified six intervention components: assessment, consultation, liaison, development of care plan, referral and follow-up. Interventions using 4 or more components more commonly reported positive outcomes. Outcome measures used to evaluate interventions were often not tracked across care settings, potentially obscuring the impact of ED navigator interventions across the care continuum.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Future research should examine which patients benefit from ED navigation and which outcome measures might help contextualise intervention effectiveness across care settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department Navigator Interventions and Outcome Measures: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Parry,&nbsp;Christopher Picard,&nbsp;Rashmi Devkota,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Tate\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opn.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emergency department (ED) patient navigators are increasingly used, but a lack of understanding of how ED navigator interventions are designed, described, and evaluated creates gaps in our ability to understand, monitor and improve care. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify how the literature describes and evaluates ED patient navigator interventions for older people transitioning to a primary care setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A scoping review was conducted following the Johanna Briggs Institute updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. We searched three databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. We included English language articles without any restrictions on study designs that two reviewers screened. All articles focused on distinct ED navigator roles to facilitate transitions for older people from the ED to primary care were included. Data extraction was completed by the primary reviewer and validated by two secondary reviewers. We report study characteristics in a table. Descriptive content analysis was used to analyse the main findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 10 studies were included out of 2102 articles identified. All studies used quantitative designs except one, which used a qualitative research design. Four studies were conducted in the United States, two in Australia and the UK and one in Canada and Belgium. Twenty unique outcome measures were identified, with hospital admission rate, frequency of ED presentations and ED/hospital length of stay being the most common. We identified six intervention components: assessment, consultation, liaison, development of care plan, referral and follow-up. Interventions using 4 or more components more commonly reported positive outcomes. Outcome measures used to evaluate interventions were often not tracked across care settings, potentially obscuring the impact of ED navigator interventions across the care continuum.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Future research should examine which patients benefit from ED navigation and which outcome measures might help contextualise intervention effectiveness across care settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Older People Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Older People Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急诊科(ED)患者导航员的使用越来越多,但缺乏对ED导航员干预措施的设计、描述和评估的了解,导致我们理解、监测和改善护理的能力存在差距。本综述的目的是确定文献如何描述和评估老年人过渡到初级保健机构的ED患者导航干预措施。方法根据约翰娜·布里格斯研究所更新的范围评价方法指南进行范围评价。我们检索了三个数据库:MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL。我们纳入了两位审稿人筛选的没有任何研究设计限制的英文文章。所有的文章都关注不同的急诊科导航员的角色,以促进老年人从急诊科向初级保健的过渡。数据提取由主要审稿人完成,并由两名次要审稿人验证。我们在表格中报告研究特征。描述性内容分析用于分析主要发现。结果在2102篇文献中,共纳入10篇研究。除一项研究采用定性研究设计外,所有研究均采用定量设计。四项研究在美国进行,两项在澳大利亚和英国进行,一项在加拿大和比利时进行。确定了20个独特的结果测量,其中住院率、急诊科就诊频率和急诊科/住院时间是最常见的。我们确定了六个干预组成部分:评估、咨询、联络、制定护理计划、转诊和随访。采用4种或更多成分的干预措施更普遍地报告了积极的结果。用于评估干预措施的结果测量通常没有在整个护理环境中进行跟踪,这可能会模糊ED导航干预措施在整个护理连续体中的影响。结论:未来的研究应该检查哪些患者从ED导航中受益,哪些结果测量可能有助于在护理环境中确定干预效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Emergency Department Navigator Interventions and Outcome Measures: A Scoping Review

Emergency Department Navigator Interventions and Outcome Measures: A Scoping Review

Introduction

Emergency department (ED) patient navigators are increasingly used, but a lack of understanding of how ED navigator interventions are designed, described, and evaluated creates gaps in our ability to understand, monitor and improve care. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify how the literature describes and evaluates ED patient navigator interventions for older people transitioning to a primary care setting.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted following the Johanna Briggs Institute updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. We searched three databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. We included English language articles without any restrictions on study designs that two reviewers screened. All articles focused on distinct ED navigator roles to facilitate transitions for older people from the ED to primary care were included. Data extraction was completed by the primary reviewer and validated by two secondary reviewers. We report study characteristics in a table. Descriptive content analysis was used to analyse the main findings.

Results

A total of 10 studies were included out of 2102 articles identified. All studies used quantitative designs except one, which used a qualitative research design. Four studies were conducted in the United States, two in Australia and the UK and one in Canada and Belgium. Twenty unique outcome measures were identified, with hospital admission rate, frequency of ED presentations and ED/hospital length of stay being the most common. We identified six intervention components: assessment, consultation, liaison, development of care plan, referral and follow-up. Interventions using 4 or more components more commonly reported positive outcomes. Outcome measures used to evaluate interventions were often not tracked across care settings, potentially obscuring the impact of ED navigator interventions across the care continuum.

Conclusion

Future research should examine which patients benefit from ED navigation and which outcome measures might help contextualise intervention effectiveness across care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信