远程血糖监测与常规护理在糖尿病管理中的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Peter Olujimi Odutola, Peter Oluwatobi Olorunyomi, Olanrewaju Olamide Olatawura, Ifeoluwapo Olorunyomi
{"title":"远程血糖监测与常规护理在糖尿病管理中的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Peter Olujimi Odutola,&nbsp;Peter Oluwatobi Olorunyomi,&nbsp;Olanrewaju Olamide Olatawura,&nbsp;Ifeoluwapo Olorunyomi","doi":"10.1002/med4.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Diabetes mellitus, especially type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a growing global health issue characterized by poor blood glucose control, leading to severe complications and increased healthcare costs. Effective management requires accessible, responsive support systems to enhance self-management, particularly for those with limited access to traditional care. The aim was to evaluate remote monitoring versus standard care in managing diabetes mellitus, focusing on outcomes like Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profiles, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure. A comprehensive literature search was performed in September 2024 using the Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases with no time restriction. Seven studies totaling 883 participants were included, comparing remote monitoring with usual care in diabetic management. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (Cochrane), calculating mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous data, with statistical significance at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Remote monitoring significantly improved glycemic control, reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference: −0.35; 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.02; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and FBG (mean difference: −0.82; 95% CI: −1.10 to −0.54; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001). Total cholesterol levels decreased significantly (mean difference: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.07; <i>p</i> = 0.01). HDL showed a minor but significant decline, while LDL reduction was non-significant. No significant differences were observed in body weight, BMI, or blood pressure. Remote monitoring shows significant potential in improving glycemic control and lipid profiles in diabetes management. Further long-term studies are needed to validate these findings, while addressing associated technological challenges.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":"3 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Remote Glucose Monitoring Versus Conventional Care in Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Peter Olujimi Odutola,&nbsp;Peter Oluwatobi Olorunyomi,&nbsp;Olanrewaju Olamide Olatawura,&nbsp;Ifeoluwapo Olorunyomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/med4.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Diabetes mellitus, especially type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a growing global health issue characterized by poor blood glucose control, leading to severe complications and increased healthcare costs. Effective management requires accessible, responsive support systems to enhance self-management, particularly for those with limited access to traditional care. The aim was to evaluate remote monitoring versus standard care in managing diabetes mellitus, focusing on outcomes like Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profiles, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure. A comprehensive literature search was performed in September 2024 using the Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases with no time restriction. Seven studies totaling 883 participants were included, comparing remote monitoring with usual care in diabetic management. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (Cochrane), calculating mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous data, with statistical significance at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Remote monitoring significantly improved glycemic control, reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference: −0.35; 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.02; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and FBG (mean difference: −0.82; 95% CI: −1.10 to −0.54; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001). Total cholesterol levels decreased significantly (mean difference: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.07; <i>p</i> = 0.01). HDL showed a minor but significant decline, while LDL reduction was non-significant. No significant differences were observed in body weight, BMI, or blood pressure. Remote monitoring shows significant potential in improving glycemic control and lipid profiles in diabetes management. Further long-term studies are needed to validate these findings, while addressing associated technological challenges.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine Advances\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"28-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.70008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病,特别是2型糖尿病(T2DM),是一个日益严重的全球健康问题,其特点是血糖控制不良,导致严重并发症和医疗保健费用增加。有效的管理需要可获得的、反应迅速的支持系统,以加强自我管理,特别是对那些获得传统护理机会有限的人。目的是评估远程监测与标准护理在糖尿病管理中的作用,重点关注血红蛋白A1C (HbA1C)水平、空腹血糖(FBG)、脂质谱、体重、体重指数(BMI)和血压等结果。我们于2024年9月使用Cochrane、b谷歌Scholar和PubMed数据库进行了全面的文献检索,没有时间限制。共纳入7项研究,共883名参与者,比较糖尿病管理中的远程监测与常规护理。使用Review Manager (Cochrane)对数据进行分析,计算连续数据的平均差异和95%置信区间(ci), p <;0.05. 远程监测可显著改善血糖控制,降低HbA1c水平(平均差值:- 0.35;95% CI:−0.67 ~−0.02;p = 0.04)和FBG(平均差值:−0.82;95% CI:−1.10 ~−0.54;p & lt;0.00001)。总胆固醇水平显著降低(平均差异:−0.28;95% CI:−0.49 ~−0.07;p = 0.01)。HDL有轻微但显著的下降,而LDL的下降不显著。在体重、身体质量指数或血压方面没有观察到显著差异。远程监测在改善糖尿病管理中的血糖控制和血脂方面显示出巨大的潜力。需要进一步的长期研究来验证这些发现,同时解决相关的技术挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of Remote Glucose Monitoring Versus Conventional Care in Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of Remote Glucose Monitoring Versus Conventional Care in Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diabetes mellitus, especially type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a growing global health issue characterized by poor blood glucose control, leading to severe complications and increased healthcare costs. Effective management requires accessible, responsive support systems to enhance self-management, particularly for those with limited access to traditional care. The aim was to evaluate remote monitoring versus standard care in managing diabetes mellitus, focusing on outcomes like Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profiles, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure. A comprehensive literature search was performed in September 2024 using the Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases with no time restriction. Seven studies totaling 883 participants were included, comparing remote monitoring with usual care in diabetic management. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (Cochrane), calculating mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous data, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Remote monitoring significantly improved glycemic control, reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference: −0.35; 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.02; p = 0.04) and FBG (mean difference: −0.82; 95% CI: −1.10 to −0.54; p < 0.00001). Total cholesterol levels decreased significantly (mean difference: −0.28; 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.07; p = 0.01). HDL showed a minor but significant decline, while LDL reduction was non-significant. No significant differences were observed in body weight, BMI, or blood pressure. Remote monitoring shows significant potential in improving glycemic control and lipid profiles in diabetes management. Further long-term studies are needed to validate these findings, while addressing associated technological challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信