Negar Abdi, Miad Alsulami, Hamid Ghaznavi
{"title":"Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 With [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT Imaging and Staging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer","authors":"Negar Abdi,&nbsp;Miad Alsulami,&nbsp;Hamid Ghaznavi","doi":"10.1002/med4.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>PET/CT has become the reference standard imaging modality for diagnosing prostate cancer because of its ability to target prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protein specific to prostate cells. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was a major advance, but limitations such as a short lifespan and image blurring led to the introduction of [<sup>18</sup>F]PSMA-1007, which offers advantages such as a longer lifespan and clearer images. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of [<sup>18</sup>F]PSMA-1007 and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in the detection and staging of recurrent prostate cancer because there is currently insufficient evidence to conclude that one PSMA-radiotracer is better than the other. Both <sup>68</sup>Ga and <sup>18</sup>F-labeled PSMA-radiotracers have similar detection rates in patients. Therefore, more investigation is required to authoritatively conclude which radiotracer results in optimal performance for diagnosing prostate cancer lesions on PET/CT. In this narrative review, we focus on comparing the effectiveness of [<sup>18</sup>F]PSMA-1007 with that of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer and determination of its stage. We found that [<sup>18</sup>F]PSMA-1007 and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 showed similar diagnostic performance, with [<sup>18</sup>F]PSMA-1007 having slightly higher sensitivity for primary and metastatic recurrent prostate cancer. However, a lack of statistical significance in the differences between the two radiotracers indicates comparable diagnostic accuracy, enabling their interchangeable use based on availability and cost efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":"3 1","pages":"9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PET/CT 能够靶向前列腺细胞特异性蛋白--前列腺特异性膜抗原 (PSMA),因此已成为诊断前列腺癌的参考标准成像方式。[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11是一项重大进步,但由于其寿命短、图像模糊等局限性,[18F]PSMA-1007应运而生,它具有寿命长、图像更清晰等优点。本研究旨在比较[18F]PSMA-1007和[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11在复发性前列腺癌的检测和分期中的有效性,因为目前还没有足够的证据来断定一种PSMA-放射示踪剂优于另一种。68Ga和18F标记的PSMA放射示踪剂在患者体内的检出率相似。因此,需要进行更多的研究,才能权威地得出结论,哪种放射性示踪剂在 PET/CT 诊断前列腺癌病灶方面性能最佳。在这篇综述中,我们重点比较了[18F]PSMA-1007与[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11在检测复发性前列腺癌并确定其分期方面的效果。我们发现[18F]PSMA-1007和[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11具有相似的诊断性能,其中[18F]PSMA-1007对原发性和转移性复发性前列腺癌的敏感性略高。不过,两种放射性核素之间的差异缺乏统计学意义,这表明它们的诊断准确性相当,因此可以根据可用性和成本效益互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 With [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT Imaging and Staging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of [18F]PSMA-1007 With [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT Imaging and Staging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

PET/CT has become the reference standard imaging modality for diagnosing prostate cancer because of its ability to target prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protein specific to prostate cells. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was a major advance, but limitations such as a short lifespan and image blurring led to the introduction of [18F]PSMA-1007, which offers advantages such as a longer lifespan and clearer images. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of [18F]PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in the detection and staging of recurrent prostate cancer because there is currently insufficient evidence to conclude that one PSMA-radiotracer is better than the other. Both 68Ga and 18F-labeled PSMA-radiotracers have similar detection rates in patients. Therefore, more investigation is required to authoritatively conclude which radiotracer results in optimal performance for diagnosing prostate cancer lesions on PET/CT. In this narrative review, we focus on comparing the effectiveness of [18F]PSMA-1007 with that of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer and determination of its stage. We found that [18F]PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 showed similar diagnostic performance, with [18F]PSMA-1007 having slightly higher sensitivity for primary and metastatic recurrent prostate cancer. However, a lack of statistical significance in the differences between the two radiotracers indicates comparable diagnostic accuracy, enabling their interchangeable use based on availability and cost efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信