Anna-Lena Tebbe, Katrin Rothmaler, Hannah Elena Zielke, Robert Hepach, Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann
{"title":"Altercentric Memory Error at 9 Months But Correct Object Memory by 18 Months Revealed in Infants’ Pupil","authors":"Anna-Lena Tebbe, Katrin Rothmaler, Hannah Elena Zielke, Robert Hepach, Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann","doi":"10.1111/desc.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It was recently proposed that infants have a memory bias for events witnessed together with others. This may allow infants to prioritize relevant information and to predict others' actions, despite limited processing capacities. However, when events occur in the absence of others, for example, an object changes location, this would create altercentric memory errors where infants misremember the object's location where others last saw it. Pupillometry presents a powerful tool to examine the temporal dynamics of such memory biases as they unfold. Here, we showed infants aged 9 (<i>N </i>= 97) and 18 months (<i>N </i>= 79) videos of an agent watching an object move to one of two hiding locations. The object then moved from location A to B, which the agent either missed (leading to her false belief) or witnessed (true belief). The object subsequently reappeared either at its actual or, surprisingly, its initial location. As predicted by the altercentric theory, 9-month-old infants expected the object where the agent falsely believed it to be and not where it really was, as indicated in their pupil dilation. In contrast, 18-month-old infants seemed to remember the object's actual location. Infants’ memory errors did not predict correct action anticipation when the agent reached into one of the locations to retrieve the object. This indicates that infants show altercentric memory errors at a young age, which vanish in the second year of life. We suggest that this bias helps young infants to learn from others, but recedes as they become more capable of acting on the world themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近有人提出,婴儿对与他人一起目睹的事件具有记忆偏差。这可能会使婴儿在处理能力有限的情况下,优先考虑相关信息并预测他人的行动。然而,当事件发生在没有其他人在场的情况下时,例如,一个物体改变了位置,这就会产生改变中心的记忆错误,即婴儿会错误地记住其他人最后看到该物体的位置。瞳孔测量法是一种强大的工具,可用于研究这种记忆偏差在时间上的动态变化。在这里,我们分别向 9 个月(97 人)和 18 个月(79 人)的婴儿播放了一段视频,视频中一个代理看着一个物体移动到两个隐藏位置中的一个。然后,物体从 A 处移动到 B 处,婴儿要么错过了(导致其产生错误信念),要么目睹了(产生真实信念)。随后,该物体再次出现在其实际位置,或令人惊讶地出现在其初始位置。正如改变中心理论所预测的那样,9 个月大的婴儿预期物体会出现在被试错误地认为的位置,而不是真正的位置,这一点从他们的瞳孔放大可以看出。相反,18 个月大的婴儿似乎记得物体的实际位置。婴儿的记忆错误并不能预测当行为主体将手伸入其中一个位置取回物品时的正确行动预期。这表明,婴儿在年幼时就会出现以改变为中心的记忆错误,这种错误会在婴儿出生后的第二年消失。我们认为,这种偏差有助于幼儿向他人学习,但随着他们自己对世界采取行动的能力增强,这种偏差就会逐渐消失。
Altercentric Memory Error at 9 Months But Correct Object Memory by 18 Months Revealed in Infants’ Pupil
It was recently proposed that infants have a memory bias for events witnessed together with others. This may allow infants to prioritize relevant information and to predict others' actions, despite limited processing capacities. However, when events occur in the absence of others, for example, an object changes location, this would create altercentric memory errors where infants misremember the object's location where others last saw it. Pupillometry presents a powerful tool to examine the temporal dynamics of such memory biases as they unfold. Here, we showed infants aged 9 (N = 97) and 18 months (N = 79) videos of an agent watching an object move to one of two hiding locations. The object then moved from location A to B, which the agent either missed (leading to her false belief) or witnessed (true belief). The object subsequently reappeared either at its actual or, surprisingly, its initial location. As predicted by the altercentric theory, 9-month-old infants expected the object where the agent falsely believed it to be and not where it really was, as indicated in their pupil dilation. In contrast, 18-month-old infants seemed to remember the object's actual location. Infants’ memory errors did not predict correct action anticipation when the agent reached into one of the locations to retrieve the object. This indicates that infants show altercentric memory errors at a young age, which vanish in the second year of life. We suggest that this bias helps young infants to learn from others, but recedes as they become more capable of acting on the world themselves.
期刊介绍:
Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain