{"title":"重叠,过度确定,以及起源的必要性","authors":"Adam Russell Murray","doi":"10.1007/s44204-025-00257-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proponents of the necessity of material origins hold roughly that an entity’s originating matter could not have been radically different from its actual originating matter. Sungil Han defends the considerably stronger position that an entity’s originating matter could not have been at all different from its actual originating matter. I raise some worries for Han’s key premise as it pertains to biological origins, and discuss certain methodological limitations of Han’s project as it pertains to the origins of artifacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overlap, overdetermination, and the necessity of origin\",\"authors\":\"Adam Russell Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44204-025-00257-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Proponents of the necessity of material origins hold roughly that an entity’s originating matter could not have been radically different from its actual originating matter. Sungil Han defends the considerably stronger position that an entity’s originating matter could not have been at all different from its actual originating matter. I raise some worries for Han’s key premise as it pertains to biological origins, and discuss certain methodological limitations of Han’s project as it pertains to the origins of artifacts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00257-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00257-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Overlap, overdetermination, and the necessity of origin
Proponents of the necessity of material origins hold roughly that an entity’s originating matter could not have been radically different from its actual originating matter. Sungil Han defends the considerably stronger position that an entity’s originating matter could not have been at all different from its actual originating matter. I raise some worries for Han’s key premise as it pertains to biological origins, and discuss certain methodological limitations of Han’s project as it pertains to the origins of artifacts.