{"title":"电解质中间层对固态电池中LiFePO4和银矾基硫化物抑制反应的影响","authors":"Jee Yun Jung and Hyoungchul Kim","doi":"10.1039/D5NJ00262A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Although LiFePO<small><sub>4</sub></small> (LFP) is considered a promising cathode active material (CAM) because of its excellent cost-effectiveness and thermal stability, its interfacial compatibility with sulfide-based solid electrolytes in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) remains a major technical hurdle. Herein, we investigated the effects of electrolyte interlayers to achieve high-efficiency LFP-based CAMs by applying interlayers of an argyrodite-based sulfide [Li<small><sub>5.4</sub></small>PS<small><sub>4.4</sub></small>Cl<small><sub>0.8</sub></small>Br<small><sub>0.8</sub></small> (LPSCB)] or a halide with high Li-ion conductivity [Li<small><sub>3</sub></small>InCl<small><sub>6</sub></small> (LIC) or Li<small><sub>2.5</sub></small>Y<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Zr<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Cl<small><sub>6</sub></small> (LYZC)]. As a result, the ASSB cell with an LIC or LYZC interlayer exhibited better electrochemical performance than that with LPSCB, with initial discharge capacities of 113.5 and 110.3 mAh g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> at 0.1C, respectively. In particular, the sulfide interlayer suffered from serious Fe<small><sup>2+</sup></small> oxidation because it interacted with other anions. Regarding the halides, LYZC was stable in contact with the sulfide SE but showed low reactivity with LFP, whereas LIC was stable with LFP but quite unstable with the sulfide SE. This strategy provides valuable insights for achieving superior interfacial structures in LFP-based ASSBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":95,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of Chemistry","volume":" 14","pages":" 6012-6019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of electrolyte interlayers on suppressing reactions with LiFePO4 and argyrodite-based sulfides in solid-state batteries†\",\"authors\":\"Jee Yun Jung and Hyoungchul Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5NJ00262A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Although LiFePO<small><sub>4</sub></small> (LFP) is considered a promising cathode active material (CAM) because of its excellent cost-effectiveness and thermal stability, its interfacial compatibility with sulfide-based solid electrolytes in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) remains a major technical hurdle. Herein, we investigated the effects of electrolyte interlayers to achieve high-efficiency LFP-based CAMs by applying interlayers of an argyrodite-based sulfide [Li<small><sub>5.4</sub></small>PS<small><sub>4.4</sub></small>Cl<small><sub>0.8</sub></small>Br<small><sub>0.8</sub></small> (LPSCB)] or a halide with high Li-ion conductivity [Li<small><sub>3</sub></small>InCl<small><sub>6</sub></small> (LIC) or Li<small><sub>2.5</sub></small>Y<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Zr<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Cl<small><sub>6</sub></small> (LYZC)]. As a result, the ASSB cell with an LIC or LYZC interlayer exhibited better electrochemical performance than that with LPSCB, with initial discharge capacities of 113.5 and 110.3 mAh g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> at 0.1C, respectively. In particular, the sulfide interlayer suffered from serious Fe<small><sup>2+</sup></small> oxidation because it interacted with other anions. Regarding the halides, LYZC was stable in contact with the sulfide SE but showed low reactivity with LFP, whereas LIC was stable with LFP but quite unstable with the sulfide SE. This strategy provides valuable insights for achieving superior interfacial structures in LFP-based ASSBs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":95,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Journal of Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\" 6012-6019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Journal of Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/nj/d5nj00262a\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/nj/d5nj00262a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管LiFePO4 (LFP)因其优异的成本效益和热稳定性被认为是一种很有前途的阴极活性材料(CAM),但其与全固态电池(assb)中硫化物基固体电解质的界面兼容性仍然是一个主要的技术障碍。在此,我们研究了电解质中间层对实现高效LFP-based cam的影响,通过使用基于银汞的硫化物[Li5.4PS4.4Cl0.8Br0.8 (LPSCB)]或具有高锂离子电导率的卤化物[Li3InCl6 (LIC)或Li2.5Y0.5Zr0.5Cl6 (LYZC)]的中间层。结果表明,LIC或LYZC夹层的ASSB电池在0.1C下的初始放电容量分别为113.5 mAh g−1和110.3 mAh g−1,其电化学性能优于LPSCB。特别是硫化物层,由于与其他阴离子相互作用,Fe2+发生了严重的氧化。在卤化物方面,LYZC与硫化SE接触稳定,但与LFP反应活性较低;LIC与LFP反应稳定,但与硫化SE反应不稳定。该策略为在基于lfp的assb中实现优越的界面结构提供了有价值的见解。
Effects of electrolyte interlayers on suppressing reactions with LiFePO4 and argyrodite-based sulfides in solid-state batteries†
Although LiFePO4 (LFP) is considered a promising cathode active material (CAM) because of its excellent cost-effectiveness and thermal stability, its interfacial compatibility with sulfide-based solid electrolytes in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) remains a major technical hurdle. Herein, we investigated the effects of electrolyte interlayers to achieve high-efficiency LFP-based CAMs by applying interlayers of an argyrodite-based sulfide [Li5.4PS4.4Cl0.8Br0.8 (LPSCB)] or a halide with high Li-ion conductivity [Li3InCl6 (LIC) or Li2.5Y0.5Zr0.5Cl6 (LYZC)]. As a result, the ASSB cell with an LIC or LYZC interlayer exhibited better electrochemical performance than that with LPSCB, with initial discharge capacities of 113.5 and 110.3 mAh g−1 at 0.1C, respectively. In particular, the sulfide interlayer suffered from serious Fe2+ oxidation because it interacted with other anions. Regarding the halides, LYZC was stable in contact with the sulfide SE but showed low reactivity with LFP, whereas LIC was stable with LFP but quite unstable with the sulfide SE. This strategy provides valuable insights for achieving superior interfacial structures in LFP-based ASSBs.