免疫检查点抑制剂在肺移植受者中的应用:病例系列和文献系统综述

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
N. Mahmoud , G. Pamart , C. Nardin , A. Schuller , S. Hirschi , T. Dégot , P.-E. Falcoz , A. Olland , C.-A. Tacquard , R. Kessler , B. Coiffard , B. Renaud-Picard
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂在肺移植受者中的应用:病例系列和文献系统综述","authors":"N. Mahmoud ,&nbsp;G. Pamart ,&nbsp;C. Nardin ,&nbsp;A. Schuller ,&nbsp;S. Hirschi ,&nbsp;T. Dégot ,&nbsp;P.-E. Falcoz ,&nbsp;A. Olland ,&nbsp;C.-A. Tacquard ,&nbsp;R. Kessler ,&nbsp;B. Coiffard ,&nbsp;B. Renaud-Picard","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an innovative treatment that has improved long-term survival in several neoplastic diseases over the past decade. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, particularly lung transplant (LTx) recipients, have been largely excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficiency of ICIs, because of the perceived high risk of allograft rejection. In this study, we sought to evaluate the use of ICIs for all neoplastic diseases in LTx patients in all French LTx centers and two Belgian centers. We found only a limited number of cases in which ICIs were suggested to two patients due to a lack of alternative treatments. In the first case, acute respiratory failure and death occurred, whereas in the second case, ICI treatment was well tolerated and resulted in a partial response. In addition, we presented the case of a third LTx patient in whom the use of ICIs was considered but not used due to the patient’s comorbidities. This last case highlights the difficulty of discussing the risk–benefit balance, which ultimately did not favor ICI treatment of this patient. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in LTx recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 104537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune checkpoint inhibitors use in lung transplant recipients: a case series and systematic review of literature\",\"authors\":\"N. Mahmoud ,&nbsp;G. Pamart ,&nbsp;C. Nardin ,&nbsp;A. Schuller ,&nbsp;S. Hirschi ,&nbsp;T. Dégot ,&nbsp;P.-E. Falcoz ,&nbsp;A. Olland ,&nbsp;C.-A. Tacquard ,&nbsp;R. Kessler ,&nbsp;B. Coiffard ,&nbsp;B. Renaud-Picard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an innovative treatment that has improved long-term survival in several neoplastic diseases over the past decade. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, particularly lung transplant (LTx) recipients, have been largely excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficiency of ICIs, because of the perceived high risk of allograft rejection. In this study, we sought to evaluate the use of ICIs for all neoplastic diseases in LTx patients in all French LTx centers and two Belgian centers. We found only a limited number of cases in which ICIs were suggested to two patients due to a lack of alternative treatments. In the first case, acute respiratory failure and death occurred, whereas in the second case, ICI treatment was well tolerated and resulted in a partial response. In addition, we presented the case of a third LTx patient in whom the use of ICIs was considered but not used due to the patient’s comorbidities. This last case highlights the difficulty of discussing the risk–benefit balance, which ultimately did not favor ICI treatment of this patient. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in LTx recipients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Open\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 104537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925004065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925004065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是一种创新的治疗方法,在过去的十年中,它提高了几种肿瘤疾病的长期生存率。实体器官移植(SOT)受者,特别是肺移植(LTx)受者,在很大程度上被排除在评估ICIs安全性和有效性的临床试验之外,因为人们认为同种异体移植排斥反应的风险很高。在这项研究中,我们试图评估所有法国LTx中心和两个比利时中心的LTx患者中所有肿瘤疾病的ICIs使用情况。我们发现,由于缺乏替代治疗方法,只有有限数量的病例建议对两名患者使用ICIs。在第一个病例中,发生了急性呼吸衰竭和死亡,而在第二个病例中,ICI治疗耐受性良好,并导致部分反应。此外,我们报告了第三例LTx患者的病例,考虑使用ICIs,但由于患者的合并症而未使用。最后一个病例强调了讨论风险-收益平衡的困难,这最终不利于该患者的ICI治疗。需要进一步的多中心随机对照试验来研究ICIs在LTx受体中的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune checkpoint inhibitors use in lung transplant recipients: a case series and systematic review of literature
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an innovative treatment that has improved long-term survival in several neoplastic diseases over the past decade. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, particularly lung transplant (LTx) recipients, have been largely excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficiency of ICIs, because of the perceived high risk of allograft rejection. In this study, we sought to evaluate the use of ICIs for all neoplastic diseases in LTx patients in all French LTx centers and two Belgian centers. We found only a limited number of cases in which ICIs were suggested to two patients due to a lack of alternative treatments. In the first case, acute respiratory failure and death occurred, whereas in the second case, ICI treatment was well tolerated and resulted in a partial response. In addition, we presented the case of a third LTx patient in whom the use of ICIs was considered but not used due to the patient’s comorbidities. This last case highlights the difficulty of discussing the risk–benefit balance, which ultimately did not favor ICI treatment of this patient. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICIs in LTx recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESMO Open
ESMO Open Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
255
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research. ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO. Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信