Phat T. Tran-Truong , Minh Q. Pham , Ha X. Son , Dat L.T. Nguyen , Minh B. Nguyen , Khiem L. Tran , Loc C.P. Van , Kiet T. Le , Khanh H. Vo , Ngan N.T. Kim , Triet M. Nguyen , Anh T. Nguyen
{"title":"数字支付系统中多因素认证的系统回顾:NIST标准校准和行业实施分析","authors":"Phat T. Tran-Truong , Minh Q. Pham , Ha X. Son , Dat L.T. Nguyen , Minh B. Nguyen , Khiem L. Tran , Loc C.P. Van , Kiet T. Le , Khanh H. Vo , Ngan N.T. Kim , Triet M. Nguyen , Anh T. Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.sysarc.2025.103402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This survey presents a systematic evaluation of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) practices in digital payment systems, analyzing their alignment with NIST Special Publications 800-63 guidelines. Through a comprehensive review of 70 academic papers published between 2017–2024 and 13 industry-based authentication tools, we examine how current implementations measure against Identity Assurance Level (IAL) and Authentication Assurance Level (AAL) standards. Our analysis reveals a significant gap between theoretical capabilities proposed in academic research and actual industry implementations, with 33% of tools relying primarily on OTP-based authentication despite more advanced methods being available. The survey identifies emerging trends like biometric authentication adoption (60% of analyzed papers) and varying regulatory compliance across sectors, with payment systems demonstrating 77% alignment with standards while IoT and E-Service domains show fragmented approaches. We propose a framework for developing adaptive authentication systems that balance security requirements with user experience through context-aware risk assessment. This work provides valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working to enhance the security and usability of digital payment authentication systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems Architecture","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of multi-factor authentication in digital payment systems: NIST standards alignment and industry implementation analysis\",\"authors\":\"Phat T. Tran-Truong , Minh Q. Pham , Ha X. Son , Dat L.T. Nguyen , Minh B. Nguyen , Khiem L. Tran , Loc C.P. Van , Kiet T. Le , Khanh H. Vo , Ngan N.T. Kim , Triet M. Nguyen , Anh T. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sysarc.2025.103402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This survey presents a systematic evaluation of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) practices in digital payment systems, analyzing their alignment with NIST Special Publications 800-63 guidelines. Through a comprehensive review of 70 academic papers published between 2017–2024 and 13 industry-based authentication tools, we examine how current implementations measure against Identity Assurance Level (IAL) and Authentication Assurance Level (AAL) standards. Our analysis reveals a significant gap between theoretical capabilities proposed in academic research and actual industry implementations, with 33% of tools relying primarily on OTP-based authentication despite more advanced methods being available. The survey identifies emerging trends like biometric authentication adoption (60% of analyzed papers) and varying regulatory compliance across sectors, with payment systems demonstrating 77% alignment with standards while IoT and E-Service domains show fragmented approaches. We propose a framework for developing adaptive authentication systems that balance security requirements with user experience through context-aware risk assessment. This work provides valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working to enhance the security and usability of digital payment authentication systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems Architecture\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383762125000748\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383762125000748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review of multi-factor authentication in digital payment systems: NIST standards alignment and industry implementation analysis
This survey presents a systematic evaluation of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) practices in digital payment systems, analyzing their alignment with NIST Special Publications 800-63 guidelines. Through a comprehensive review of 70 academic papers published between 2017–2024 and 13 industry-based authentication tools, we examine how current implementations measure against Identity Assurance Level (IAL) and Authentication Assurance Level (AAL) standards. Our analysis reveals a significant gap between theoretical capabilities proposed in academic research and actual industry implementations, with 33% of tools relying primarily on OTP-based authentication despite more advanced methods being available. The survey identifies emerging trends like biometric authentication adoption (60% of analyzed papers) and varying regulatory compliance across sectors, with payment systems demonstrating 77% alignment with standards while IoT and E-Service domains show fragmented approaches. We propose a framework for developing adaptive authentication systems that balance security requirements with user experience through context-aware risk assessment. This work provides valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working to enhance the security and usability of digital payment authentication systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Systems Architecture: Embedded Software Design (JSA) is a journal covering all design and architectural aspects related to embedded systems and software. It ranges from the microarchitecture level via the system software level up to the application-specific architecture level. Aspects such as real-time systems, operating systems, FPGA programming, programming languages, communications (limited to analysis and the software stack), mobile systems, parallel and distributed architectures as well as additional subjects in the computer and system architecture area will fall within the scope of this journal. Technology will not be a main focus, but its use and relevance to particular designs will be. Case studies are welcome but must contribute more than just a design for a particular piece of software.
Design automation of such systems including methodologies, techniques and tools for their design as well as novel designs of software components fall within the scope of this journal. Novel applications that use embedded systems are also central in this journal. While hardware is not a part of this journal hardware/software co-design methods that consider interplay between software and hardware components with and emphasis on software are also relevant here.