探索去增长运动:概念、策略和战术的调查

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Nick Fitzpatrick , Dennis Eversberg , Matthias Schmelzer
{"title":"探索去增长运动:概念、策略和战术的调查","authors":"Nick Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;Dennis Eversberg ,&nbsp;Matthias Schmelzer","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Degrowth – the downscaling of production and consumption to reduce ecological footprints, planned democratically in a way that is equitable while securing wellbeing – is emerging as an alternative strategy for social-ecological transformation. While research on degrowth as a scientific concept is burgeoning, there are few studies exploring the strategies and tactics that may be necessary for social movements to achieve social-ecological transformation. To stimulate this dialogue, we conduct a survey and statistical analysis of degrowth scholar-activists regarding diverging conceptualisations of degrowth, strategic orientations, and tactical preferences using correlation, principal component, and cluster analysis (<em>n</em> = 399). The results reveal how different interpretations of degrowth align with strategic orientations and support for implementing various direct-action tactics. Our findings point to the potential for the degrowth movement to develop a strategy of unarmed resistance that combines nonviolent resistance with anti-property actions. To explore the diversity within the degrowth movement, we identify four currents: antagonistic anarchism, systemic utopianism, environmental pragmatism, and ecological limitarianism. The paper concludes by reflecting on the preanalytic vision of degrowth, the strategic implications of pluralism, and how these strategic orientations and tactical preferences could fit together.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104045"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the degrowth movement: A survey of conceptualisations, strategies, and tactics\",\"authors\":\"Nick Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;Dennis Eversberg ,&nbsp;Matthias Schmelzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Degrowth – the downscaling of production and consumption to reduce ecological footprints, planned democratically in a way that is equitable while securing wellbeing – is emerging as an alternative strategy for social-ecological transformation. While research on degrowth as a scientific concept is burgeoning, there are few studies exploring the strategies and tactics that may be necessary for social movements to achieve social-ecological transformation. To stimulate this dialogue, we conduct a survey and statistical analysis of degrowth scholar-activists regarding diverging conceptualisations of degrowth, strategic orientations, and tactical preferences using correlation, principal component, and cluster analysis (<em>n</em> = 399). The results reveal how different interpretations of degrowth align with strategic orientations and support for implementing various direct-action tactics. Our findings point to the potential for the degrowth movement to develop a strategy of unarmed resistance that combines nonviolent resistance with anti-property actions. To explore the diversity within the degrowth movement, we identify four currents: antagonistic anarchism, systemic utopianism, environmental pragmatism, and ecological limitarianism. The paper concludes by reflecting on the preanalytic vision of degrowth, the strategic implications of pluralism, and how these strategic orientations and tactical preferences could fit together.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001264\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

去增长——减少生产和消费规模以减少生态足迹,以公平的方式民主规划,同时确保福祉——正在成为社会生态转型的另一种战略。虽然去生长作为一个科学概念的研究正在蓬勃发展,但很少有研究探索社会运动实现社会生态转型所需的战略和策略。为了激发这种对话,我们使用相关性、主成分和聚类分析(n = 399)对去增长学者-活动家进行了一项调查和统计分析,分析了去增长、战略取向和战术偏好的不同概念。研究结果揭示了对去增长的不同解释如何与战略导向和对实施各种直接行动战术的支持相一致。我们的研究结果指出,反增长运动有可能发展出一种非武装抵抗战略,将非暴力抵抗与反财产行动相结合。为了探索去增长运动的多样性,我们确定了四种趋势:对抗性无政府主义、系统乌托邦主义、环境实用主义和生态限制主义。最后,本文反思了去增长的前分析愿景、多元主义的战略含义,以及这些战略取向和战术偏好如何结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the degrowth movement: A survey of conceptualisations, strategies, and tactics

Exploring the degrowth movement: A survey of conceptualisations, strategies, and tactics
Degrowth – the downscaling of production and consumption to reduce ecological footprints, planned democratically in a way that is equitable while securing wellbeing – is emerging as an alternative strategy for social-ecological transformation. While research on degrowth as a scientific concept is burgeoning, there are few studies exploring the strategies and tactics that may be necessary for social movements to achieve social-ecological transformation. To stimulate this dialogue, we conduct a survey and statistical analysis of degrowth scholar-activists regarding diverging conceptualisations of degrowth, strategic orientations, and tactical preferences using correlation, principal component, and cluster analysis (n = 399). The results reveal how different interpretations of degrowth align with strategic orientations and support for implementing various direct-action tactics. Our findings point to the potential for the degrowth movement to develop a strategy of unarmed resistance that combines nonviolent resistance with anti-property actions. To explore the diversity within the degrowth movement, we identify four currents: antagonistic anarchism, systemic utopianism, environmental pragmatism, and ecological limitarianism. The paper concludes by reflecting on the preanalytic vision of degrowth, the strategic implications of pluralism, and how these strategic orientations and tactical preferences could fit together.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信