急性迷走神经刺激和随后的静态握力运动对健康成人的心血管和交感神经反应

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Takuro Washio , John D. Akins , Sarah L. Hissen , Anna K. Geib , Skyler A. Robles , Qi Fu
{"title":"急性迷走神经刺激和随后的静态握力运动对健康成人的心血管和交感神经反应","authors":"Takuro Washio ,&nbsp;John D. Akins ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Hissen ,&nbsp;Anna K. Geib ,&nbsp;Skyler A. Robles ,&nbsp;Qi Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2025.103270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses during acute cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) and subsequent static handgrip (SHG) exercise with post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) in healthy humans.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten healthy adults (5 men and 5 women, 33 ± 9 [standard deviation] yrs) participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover study. Each participant was studied twice on two separate days, with approximately 4 weeks apart: once during the actual cervical nVNS and once during sham stimulation for 4 min each. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during nVNS and sham stimulation. In addition, participants performed SHG at 40 % of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue, followed by 2-min PECO to isolate muscle metaboreflex activation before and after each stimulation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During both nVNS and sham stimulation, HR decreased (△−4 ± 4 and △−4 ± 5 bpm; both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and MSNA increased (△4 ± 6 and △2 ± 3 bursts/min; both P &lt; 0.001) in all participants, although MAP remained unchanged (<em>P</em> = 0.312). However, these responses did not differ between nVNS and sham stimulation (all <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in cardiovascular and MSNA responses to fatiguing SHG and PECO between stimulations (all <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to the sham condition, cervical nVNS had no significant impact on cardiovascular variables and MSNA during acute stimulation, nor on the responses to SHG or PECO. These findings suggest that cervical nVNS has no or minimal acute effect on sympathetic neural (re)activity in healthy adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 103270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses during acute vagus nerve stimulation and subsequent static handgrip exercise in healthy adults\",\"authors\":\"Takuro Washio ,&nbsp;John D. Akins ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Hissen ,&nbsp;Anna K. Geib ,&nbsp;Skyler A. Robles ,&nbsp;Qi Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autneu.2025.103270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses during acute cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) and subsequent static handgrip (SHG) exercise with post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) in healthy humans.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten healthy adults (5 men and 5 women, 33 ± 9 [standard deviation] yrs) participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover study. Each participant was studied twice on two separate days, with approximately 4 weeks apart: once during the actual cervical nVNS and once during sham stimulation for 4 min each. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during nVNS and sham stimulation. In addition, participants performed SHG at 40 % of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue, followed by 2-min PECO to isolate muscle metaboreflex activation before and after each stimulation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During both nVNS and sham stimulation, HR decreased (△−4 ± 4 and △−4 ± 5 bpm; both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and MSNA increased (△4 ± 6 and △2 ± 3 bursts/min; both P &lt; 0.001) in all participants, although MAP remained unchanged (<em>P</em> = 0.312). However, these responses did not differ between nVNS and sham stimulation (all <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in cardiovascular and MSNA responses to fatiguing SHG and PECO between stimulations (all <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to the sham condition, cervical nVNS had no significant impact on cardiovascular variables and MSNA during acute stimulation, nor on the responses to SHG or PECO. These findings suggest that cervical nVNS has no or minimal acute effect on sympathetic neural (re)activity in healthy adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical\",\"volume\":\"259 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070225000323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070225000323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨急性颈部无创迷走神经刺激(nVNS)和随后的静止握力(SHG)运动伴运动后循环闭塞(PECO)时的心血管和交感神经反应。方法10名健康成人(男5名,女5名,33±9[标准差]岁)参加了这项双盲、随机、交叉研究。每个参与者分别在两天进行两次研究,间隔约4周:一次在实际的颈椎nVNS期间,一次在假刺激期间,每次4分钟。在nVNS和假刺激期间测量平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)。此外,参与者以最大自愿收缩的40%进行SHG,直到疲劳,然后在每次刺激前后进行2分钟的PECO,以隔离肌肉代谢反射激活。结果nVNS和假性刺激时,心率降低(△−4±4和△−4±5 bpm);P <;0.001), MSNA增加(△4±6次和△2±3次/min;P <;0.001),尽管MAP保持不变(P = 0.312)。然而,这些反应在nVNS和假刺激之间没有差异(所有P >;0.05)。此外,两种刺激对疲劳SHG和PECO的心血管和MSNA反应没有差异(所有P >;0.05)。结论与假手术相比,颈椎nVNS对急性刺激时的心血管变量和MSNA无显著影响,对SHG和PECO的反应无显著影响。这些发现表明,颈椎nVNS对健康成人交感神经(re)活动没有或只有很小的急性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses during acute vagus nerve stimulation and subsequent static handgrip exercise in healthy adults

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses during acute cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) and subsequent static handgrip (SHG) exercise with post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) in healthy humans.

Methods

Ten healthy adults (5 men and 5 women, 33 ± 9 [standard deviation] yrs) participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover study. Each participant was studied twice on two separate days, with approximately 4 weeks apart: once during the actual cervical nVNS and once during sham stimulation for 4 min each. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during nVNS and sham stimulation. In addition, participants performed SHG at 40 % of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue, followed by 2-min PECO to isolate muscle metaboreflex activation before and after each stimulation.

Results

During both nVNS and sham stimulation, HR decreased (△−4 ± 4 and △−4 ± 5 bpm; both P < 0.001), and MSNA increased (△4 ± 6 and △2 ± 3 bursts/min; both P < 0.001) in all participants, although MAP remained unchanged (P = 0.312). However, these responses did not differ between nVNS and sham stimulation (all P > 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in cardiovascular and MSNA responses to fatiguing SHG and PECO between stimulations (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared to the sham condition, cervical nVNS had no significant impact on cardiovascular variables and MSNA during acute stimulation, nor on the responses to SHG or PECO. These findings suggest that cervical nVNS has no or minimal acute effect on sympathetic neural (re)activity in healthy adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信