Yulin Zhu , Zhu Gao , Xiaoling Wang , Shanxing Gong , Yupeng Lu , Dongliang Yao , Fan Yang
{"title":"间作对中国果园地上地下生物多样性影响的量化:meta分析","authors":"Yulin Zhu , Zhu Gao , Xiaoling Wang , Shanxing Gong , Yupeng Lu , Dongliang Yao , Fan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intercropping systems improve crop productivity through enhanced biodiversity and ecosystem functioning; however, we lack an understanding of how intercropping influences biodiversity across multiple trophic levels. This research focuses on the effects of intercropping in orchards, a practice where different crops are grown together, compared to traditional monoculture systems. The aim is to understand how intercropping influences biodiversity in both aboveground and belowground ecosystems across China. Utilizing a meta-analysis approach, the study evaluates data from 567 observations across 50 studies in China. It assesses the impacts of intercropping on various groups, including pests, predators, and parasitoids aboveground, and bacteria, fungi, and soil fauna belowground. The study also considers the role of different orchard management practices, such as types of intercropping and pesticide use. Findings show that intercropping substantially boosts biodiversity. Belowground biodiversity benefits more (abundance increased by 39 %, richness by 20 %). Specifically, aboveground predators and parasitoids see a 67 % and 29 % increase in abundance, respectively, while richness of predators increased by 11 %. Belowground fungi increased by 30 % in abundance and bacteria increased by 3 % in Shannon diversity, while soil fauna abundance and richness increased by 76 % and 29 %, respectively. Notably, the combination of fruit with grass or flowers and minimizing pesticide application proved most beneficial. Overall, our finding provides robust evidence for the positive crop diversification-biodiversity relationships in orchards across China, emphasizing that intercropping is a promising way to conserve natural enemies, soil microbial and soil fauna diversity and may contribute to biocontrol, soil improvements and crop yields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the impacts of intercropping practices on above- and belowground biodiversity in China's orchards: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yulin Zhu , Zhu Gao , Xiaoling Wang , Shanxing Gong , Yupeng Lu , Dongliang Yao , Fan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intercropping systems improve crop productivity through enhanced biodiversity and ecosystem functioning; however, we lack an understanding of how intercropping influences biodiversity across multiple trophic levels. This research focuses on the effects of intercropping in orchards, a practice where different crops are grown together, compared to traditional monoculture systems. The aim is to understand how intercropping influences biodiversity in both aboveground and belowground ecosystems across China. Utilizing a meta-analysis approach, the study evaluates data from 567 observations across 50 studies in China. It assesses the impacts of intercropping on various groups, including pests, predators, and parasitoids aboveground, and bacteria, fungi, and soil fauna belowground. The study also considers the role of different orchard management practices, such as types of intercropping and pesticide use. Findings show that intercropping substantially boosts biodiversity. Belowground biodiversity benefits more (abundance increased by 39 %, richness by 20 %). Specifically, aboveground predators and parasitoids see a 67 % and 29 % increase in abundance, respectively, while richness of predators increased by 11 %. Belowground fungi increased by 30 % in abundance and bacteria increased by 3 % in Shannon diversity, while soil fauna abundance and richness increased by 76 % and 29 %, respectively. Notably, the combination of fruit with grass or flowers and minimizing pesticide application proved most beneficial. Overall, our finding provides robust evidence for the positive crop diversification-biodiversity relationships in orchards across China, emphasizing that intercropping is a promising way to conserve natural enemies, soil microbial and soil fauna diversity and may contribute to biocontrol, soil improvements and crop yields.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying the impacts of intercropping practices on above- and belowground biodiversity in China's orchards: A meta-analysis
Intercropping systems improve crop productivity through enhanced biodiversity and ecosystem functioning; however, we lack an understanding of how intercropping influences biodiversity across multiple trophic levels. This research focuses on the effects of intercropping in orchards, a practice where different crops are grown together, compared to traditional monoculture systems. The aim is to understand how intercropping influences biodiversity in both aboveground and belowground ecosystems across China. Utilizing a meta-analysis approach, the study evaluates data from 567 observations across 50 studies in China. It assesses the impacts of intercropping on various groups, including pests, predators, and parasitoids aboveground, and bacteria, fungi, and soil fauna belowground. The study also considers the role of different orchard management practices, such as types of intercropping and pesticide use. Findings show that intercropping substantially boosts biodiversity. Belowground biodiversity benefits more (abundance increased by 39 %, richness by 20 %). Specifically, aboveground predators and parasitoids see a 67 % and 29 % increase in abundance, respectively, while richness of predators increased by 11 %. Belowground fungi increased by 30 % in abundance and bacteria increased by 3 % in Shannon diversity, while soil fauna abundance and richness increased by 76 % and 29 %, respectively. Notably, the combination of fruit with grass or flowers and minimizing pesticide application proved most beneficial. Overall, our finding provides robust evidence for the positive crop diversification-biodiversity relationships in orchards across China, emphasizing that intercropping is a promising way to conserve natural enemies, soil microbial and soil fauna diversity and may contribute to biocontrol, soil improvements and crop yields.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.