从最佳可用的物理化学参数中减少不确定性的策略,用于跨多媒体环境建模的新型有机磷酸酯

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Changyue Xing, Jianxin Ge, Rongcan Chen, Shuaiqi Li, Chen Wang, Xianming Zhang, Yong Geng, Kevin C. Jones and Ying Zhu*, 
{"title":"从最佳可用的物理化学参数中减少不确定性的策略,用于跨多媒体环境建模的新型有机磷酸酯","authors":"Changyue Xing,&nbsp;Jianxin Ge,&nbsp;Rongcan Chen,&nbsp;Shuaiqi Li,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Xianming Zhang,&nbsp;Yong Geng,&nbsp;Kevin C. Jones and Ying Zhu*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1102810.1021/acs.est.4c11028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Organophosphate esters (OPEs) raise growing environmental and human health concerns globally. However, numerous novel OPEs lack data on physicochemical properties, which are essential for assessing environmental fate, exposure, and risks. This study predicted water solubility (<i>S</i><sub>w</sub>), vapor pressure (<i>V</i><sub>p</sub>), octanol–water partition coefficient (<i>K</i><sub>ow</sub>), and octanol–air partition coefficient (<i>K</i><sub>oa</sub>) at 25 °C for 46 novel OPEs by identifying optimal <i>in silico</i> tools and establishing prediction strategies based on molecular weights (MWs). Prediction discrepancies between <i>in silico</i> tools increased with MWs and structural complexity. Method evaluations for compounds with MWs &gt; 450 g/mol suggest that COSMOtherm is advantageous in predicting <i>S</i><sub>w</sub> and <i>V</i><sub>p</sub> for alkyl-OPEs, while SPARC is better for predicting <i>V</i><sub>p</sub> for aryl- and halogenated-OPEs. For compounds with MWs &gt; 500 g/mol, COSMOtherm and SPARC are recommended for <i>K</i><sub>ow</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>oa</sub> prediction, respectively. For smaller OPEs, average values from the top three of COSMOtherm, SPARC, EPI Suite, and OPERA, ranked by validation on traditional flame retardants, are recommended. Using improper software could cause deviations in multimedia distribution and overall persistence in the environment by up to 83 and 350%, respectively. The present data and prediction strategy are useful to enhance the reliability of environmental fate, exposure, and risk assessments of various OPEs and emerging contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 12","pages":"6224–6234 6224–6234"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies to Reduce Uncertainties from the Best Available Physicochemical Parameters Used for Modeling Novel Organophosphate Esters across Multimedia Environments\",\"authors\":\"Changyue Xing,&nbsp;Jianxin Ge,&nbsp;Rongcan Chen,&nbsp;Shuaiqi Li,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Xianming Zhang,&nbsp;Yong Geng,&nbsp;Kevin C. Jones and Ying Zhu*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c1102810.1021/acs.est.4c11028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Organophosphate esters (OPEs) raise growing environmental and human health concerns globally. However, numerous novel OPEs lack data on physicochemical properties, which are essential for assessing environmental fate, exposure, and risks. This study predicted water solubility (<i>S</i><sub>w</sub>), vapor pressure (<i>V</i><sub>p</sub>), octanol–water partition coefficient (<i>K</i><sub>ow</sub>), and octanol–air partition coefficient (<i>K</i><sub>oa</sub>) at 25 °C for 46 novel OPEs by identifying optimal <i>in silico</i> tools and establishing prediction strategies based on molecular weights (MWs). Prediction discrepancies between <i>in silico</i> tools increased with MWs and structural complexity. Method evaluations for compounds with MWs &gt; 450 g/mol suggest that COSMOtherm is advantageous in predicting <i>S</i><sub>w</sub> and <i>V</i><sub>p</sub> for alkyl-OPEs, while SPARC is better for predicting <i>V</i><sub>p</sub> for aryl- and halogenated-OPEs. For compounds with MWs &gt; 500 g/mol, COSMOtherm and SPARC are recommended for <i>K</i><sub>ow</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>oa</sub> prediction, respectively. For smaller OPEs, average values from the top three of COSMOtherm, SPARC, EPI Suite, and OPERA, ranked by validation on traditional flame retardants, are recommended. Using improper software could cause deviations in multimedia distribution and overall persistence in the environment by up to 83 and 350%, respectively. The present data and prediction strategy are useful to enhance the reliability of environmental fate, exposure, and risk assessments of various OPEs and emerging contaminants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 12\",\"pages\":\"6224–6234 6224–6234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c11028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c11028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有机磷酸酯(OPEs)在全球范围内引起了日益严重的环境和人类健康问题。然而,许多新型OPEs缺乏物理化学性质的数据,而这些数据对于评估环境命运、暴露和风险至关重要。本研究通过确定最佳的硅工具并建立基于分子量(mw)的预测策略,预测了46种新型OPEs在25°C下的水溶性(Sw)、蒸汽压(Vp)、辛醇-水分配系数(Kow)和辛醇-空气分配系数(Koa)。硅工具之间的预测差异随着MWs和结构复杂性的增加而增加。含MWs和gt化合物的方法评价;450 g/mol表明COSMOtherm在预测烷基- opes的Sw和Vp方面具有优势,而SPARC在预测芳基- opes和卤代- opes的Vp方面具有优势。对于含有MWs和gt的化合物;Kow和Koa的预测建议分别采用500 g/mol、COSMOtherm和SPARC。对于较小的ope,建议使用COSMOtherm、SPARC、EPI Suite和OPERA的前三名的平均值,根据传统阻燃剂的验证排名。使用不正确的软件可能导致多媒体分发和环境中的总体持久性偏差分别高达83%和350%。目前的数据和预测策略有助于提高各种OPEs和新出现污染物的环境命运、暴露和风险评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Strategies to Reduce Uncertainties from the Best Available Physicochemical Parameters Used for Modeling Novel Organophosphate Esters across Multimedia Environments

Strategies to Reduce Uncertainties from the Best Available Physicochemical Parameters Used for Modeling Novel Organophosphate Esters across Multimedia Environments

Organophosphate esters (OPEs) raise growing environmental and human health concerns globally. However, numerous novel OPEs lack data on physicochemical properties, which are essential for assessing environmental fate, exposure, and risks. This study predicted water solubility (Sw), vapor pressure (Vp), octanol–water partition coefficient (Kow), and octanol–air partition coefficient (Koa) at 25 °C for 46 novel OPEs by identifying optimal in silico tools and establishing prediction strategies based on molecular weights (MWs). Prediction discrepancies between in silico tools increased with MWs and structural complexity. Method evaluations for compounds with MWs > 450 g/mol suggest that COSMOtherm is advantageous in predicting Sw and Vp for alkyl-OPEs, while SPARC is better for predicting Vp for aryl- and halogenated-OPEs. For compounds with MWs > 500 g/mol, COSMOtherm and SPARC are recommended for Kow and Koa prediction, respectively. For smaller OPEs, average values from the top three of COSMOtherm, SPARC, EPI Suite, and OPERA, ranked by validation on traditional flame retardants, are recommended. Using improper software could cause deviations in multimedia distribution and overall persistence in the environment by up to 83 and 350%, respectively. The present data and prediction strategy are useful to enhance the reliability of environmental fate, exposure, and risk assessments of various OPEs and emerging contaminants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信