土壤正、负启动效应对实验升温的不同响应

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Junxia Ding, Yanghui He, Liming Yin, Changjiang Huang, Kui Xue, Shaobin Yan, Ruiqiang Liu, Peng Wang, Xuhui Zhou
{"title":"土壤正、负启动效应对实验升温的不同响应","authors":"Junxia Ding,&nbsp;Yanghui He,&nbsp;Liming Yin,&nbsp;Changjiang Huang,&nbsp;Kui Xue,&nbsp;Shaobin Yan,&nbsp;Ruiqiang Liu,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Xuhui Zhou","doi":"10.1111/geb.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The priming effect (PE) refers to changes in the decomposition of native soil organic carbon induced by exogenous carbon inputs. Specifically, an increase in native soil organic carbon decomposition is termed positive PE, whereas a decrease is referred to as negative PE. In this study, we aimed to investigate how positive and negative PE respond to experimental warming and the factors controlling these responses at a global scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>2008–2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Soil organic matter priming.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a global meta-analysis combining 370 paired observations globally and calculated effect sizes (<i>d</i>) of experimental warming on soil positive and negative PE separately using the Hedge's <i>d</i> approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Experimental warming induced a significant negative effect on soil PE. Further, positive and negative PE responded differently to increasing temperature: warming decreased positive PE and increased negative PE, lowering the effect size (<i>d</i>) of warming on overall PE. Soil pH and clay content had the strongest influence on variance in positive and negative PE under warming, respectively. The effect of warming on PE varied with ecosystem type: positive PE was more strongly inhibited in forests and croplands compared to grasslands, whereas warming significantly decreased the magnitude of negative PE in grasslands.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study reveals distinct responses of positive and negative PE to experimental warming, suggesting that PE may be lower under warming, with the effect size (<i>d</i>) depending on PE direction and ecosystem type. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing positive from negative PE to improve predictions of soil organic carbon dynamics under climate warming.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent Responses of Soil Positive and Negative Priming Effects to Experimental Warming\",\"authors\":\"Junxia Ding,&nbsp;Yanghui He,&nbsp;Liming Yin,&nbsp;Changjiang Huang,&nbsp;Kui Xue,&nbsp;Shaobin Yan,&nbsp;Ruiqiang Liu,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Xuhui Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The priming effect (PE) refers to changes in the decomposition of native soil organic carbon induced by exogenous carbon inputs. Specifically, an increase in native soil organic carbon decomposition is termed positive PE, whereas a decrease is referred to as negative PE. In this study, we aimed to investigate how positive and negative PE respond to experimental warming and the factors controlling these responses at a global scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>2008–2025.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Soil organic matter priming.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a global meta-analysis combining 370 paired observations globally and calculated effect sizes (<i>d</i>) of experimental warming on soil positive and negative PE separately using the Hedge's <i>d</i> approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Experimental warming induced a significant negative effect on soil PE. Further, positive and negative PE responded differently to increasing temperature: warming decreased positive PE and increased negative PE, lowering the effect size (<i>d</i>) of warming on overall PE. Soil pH and clay content had the strongest influence on variance in positive and negative PE under warming, respectively. The effect of warming on PE varied with ecosystem type: positive PE was more strongly inhibited in forests and croplands compared to grasslands, whereas warming significantly decreased the magnitude of negative PE in grasslands.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study reveals distinct responses of positive and negative PE to experimental warming, suggesting that PE may be lower under warming, with the effect size (<i>d</i>) depending on PE direction and ecosystem type. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing positive from negative PE to improve predictions of soil organic carbon dynamics under climate warming.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

启动效应(priming effect, PE)是指外源碳输入引起的原生土壤有机碳分解的变化。具体来说,原生土壤有机碳分解的增加被称为正PE,而减少被称为负PE。在这项研究中,我们的目的是在全球范围内探讨正PE和负PE对实验变暖的响应以及控制这些响应的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Divergent Responses of Soil Positive and Negative Priming Effects to Experimental Warming

Divergent Responses of Soil Positive and Negative Priming Effects to Experimental Warming

Aim

The priming effect (PE) refers to changes in the decomposition of native soil organic carbon induced by exogenous carbon inputs. Specifically, an increase in native soil organic carbon decomposition is termed positive PE, whereas a decrease is referred to as negative PE. In this study, we aimed to investigate how positive and negative PE respond to experimental warming and the factors controlling these responses at a global scale.

Location

Global.

Time Period

2008–2025.

Major Taxa Studied

Soil organic matter priming.

Methods

We conducted a global meta-analysis combining 370 paired observations globally and calculated effect sizes (d) of experimental warming on soil positive and negative PE separately using the Hedge's d approach.

Results

Experimental warming induced a significant negative effect on soil PE. Further, positive and negative PE responded differently to increasing temperature: warming decreased positive PE and increased negative PE, lowering the effect size (d) of warming on overall PE. Soil pH and clay content had the strongest influence on variance in positive and negative PE under warming, respectively. The effect of warming on PE varied with ecosystem type: positive PE was more strongly inhibited in forests and croplands compared to grasslands, whereas warming significantly decreased the magnitude of negative PE in grasslands.

Main Conclusions

Our study reveals distinct responses of positive and negative PE to experimental warming, suggesting that PE may be lower under warming, with the effect size (d) depending on PE direction and ecosystem type. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing positive from negative PE to improve predictions of soil organic carbon dynamics under climate warming.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信