创业中的设计:揭示多重解释和哲学基础

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Stefano Magistretti, Silvia Sanasi, Nico F. Klenner, Jeanne Liedtka
{"title":"创业中的设计:揭示多重解释和哲学基础","authors":"Stefano Magistretti, Silvia Sanasi, Nico F. Klenner, Jeanne Liedtka","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design has become a prominent concept in entrepreneurship research and practise. However, previous literature has offered multiple, often divergent interpretations of the role of design in entrepreneurship. For example, studies have highlighted the benefits of adopting design thinking practises in entrepreneurial endeavours, using design science as a research method for studying entrepreneurship and treating entrepreneurial opportunities as design artefacts that entrepreneurs can shape. Although this multitude of perspectives reflects the conceptual richness of design, it simultaneously complicates the accumulation of scholarly understanding. To address this issue, we have conducted a systematic literature review, uncovering the philosophical assumptions underpinning different interpretations of design in entrepreneurship: (i) design as ontology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship as design</jats:italic>), (ii) design as epistemology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship research as design research</jats:italic>), (iii) design as phenomenology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship as a means to design</jats:italic>), (iv) design as logic (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship by design</jats:italic>) and (v) design as methodology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship through design</jats:italic>). Further, we have identified five modes of enquiry that can guide future studies of design in entrepreneurship. The resulting interpretive framework contributes to entrepreneurship theory and practise by providing a foundation for more conscious and systematic research on design in entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design in entrepreneurship: Unveiling multiple interpretations and philosophical underpinnings\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Magistretti, Silvia Sanasi, Nico F. Klenner, Jeanne Liedtka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.12397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design has become a prominent concept in entrepreneurship research and practise. However, previous literature has offered multiple, often divergent interpretations of the role of design in entrepreneurship. For example, studies have highlighted the benefits of adopting design thinking practises in entrepreneurial endeavours, using design science as a research method for studying entrepreneurship and treating entrepreneurial opportunities as design artefacts that entrepreneurs can shape. Although this multitude of perspectives reflects the conceptual richness of design, it simultaneously complicates the accumulation of scholarly understanding. To address this issue, we have conducted a systematic literature review, uncovering the philosophical assumptions underpinning different interpretations of design in entrepreneurship: (i) design as ontology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship as design</jats:italic>), (ii) design as epistemology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship research as design research</jats:italic>), (iii) design as phenomenology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship as a means to design</jats:italic>), (iv) design as logic (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship by design</jats:italic>) and (v) design as methodology (<jats:italic>entrepreneurship through design</jats:italic>). Further, we have identified five modes of enquiry that can guide future studies of design in entrepreneurship. The resulting interpretive framework contributes to entrepreneurship theory and practise by providing a foundation for more conscious and systematic research on design in entrepreneurship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12397\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12397","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计已经成为创业研究和实践中的一个突出概念。然而,以前的文献对设计在创业中的作用提供了多种,往往是不同的解释。例如,研究强调了在创业活动中采用设计思维实践的好处,使用设计科学作为研究创业精神的研究方法,并将创业机会视为企业家可以塑造的设计人工制品。虽然这多种观点反映了设计概念的丰富性,但同时也使学术理解的积累变得复杂。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了系统的文献回顾,揭示了支持创业中设计的不同解释的哲学假设:(i)设计作为本体论(创业作为设计),(ii)设计作为认识论(创业研究作为设计研究),(iii)设计作为现象学(创业作为设计的手段),(iv)设计作为逻辑(设计创业)和(v)设计作为方法论(通过设计创业)。此外,我们已经确定了五种调查模式,可以指导未来的创业设计研究。由此产生的解释框架有助于创业理论和实践,为更有意识和系统地研究创业中的设计提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design in entrepreneurship: Unveiling multiple interpretations and philosophical underpinnings
Design has become a prominent concept in entrepreneurship research and practise. However, previous literature has offered multiple, often divergent interpretations of the role of design in entrepreneurship. For example, studies have highlighted the benefits of adopting design thinking practises in entrepreneurial endeavours, using design science as a research method for studying entrepreneurship and treating entrepreneurial opportunities as design artefacts that entrepreneurs can shape. Although this multitude of perspectives reflects the conceptual richness of design, it simultaneously complicates the accumulation of scholarly understanding. To address this issue, we have conducted a systematic literature review, uncovering the philosophical assumptions underpinning different interpretations of design in entrepreneurship: (i) design as ontology (entrepreneurship as design), (ii) design as epistemology (entrepreneurship research as design research), (iii) design as phenomenology (entrepreneurship as a means to design), (iv) design as logic (entrepreneurship by design) and (v) design as methodology (entrepreneurship through design). Further, we have identified five modes of enquiry that can guide future studies of design in entrepreneurship. The resulting interpretive framework contributes to entrepreneurship theory and practise by providing a foundation for more conscious and systematic research on design in entrepreneurship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信