Aminul Haque, Helen Parsons, Nick Parsons, James Mason, Iftekhar Khan, Nigel Stallard, Martin Underwood, Charles Hutchinson, Tom Lawrence, Steve Drew, Rebecca Kearney, Andrew Metcalfe
{"title":"Two-Year Follow-up of a Group-Sequential, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of a Subacromial Balloon Spacer for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears of the Shoulder (START:REACTS)","authors":"Aminul Haque, Helen Parsons, Nick Parsons, James Mason, Iftekhar Khan, Nigel Stallard, Martin Underwood, Charles Hutchinson, Tom Lawrence, Steve Drew, Rebecca Kearney, Andrew Metcalfe","doi":"10.1177/03635465251326891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The best management of irreparable rotator cuff tears remains uncertain, with multiple new techniques introduced over the past 2 decades. Two options for treatment are arthroscopic debridement and biceps tenotomy, or the subacromial balloon spacer. Early trial results favored the former option, but the 2-year results have not yet been reported. Purpose: To report the 2-year follow-up outcomes of the START:REACTS trial, investigating the use of a subacromial balloon spacer for irreparable rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Eligible participants had an irreparable rotator cuff tear, intrusive symptoms requiring surgery, and previous unsuccessful nonoperative care. Participants were randomized 1:1 to debridement of the subacromial space with biceps tenotomy (debridement only) or the same procedure with the addition of the subacromial balloon spacer (debridement with device). The 12-month primary outcome was previously reported; this article presents the 24-month results. Linear regression models were used to analyze the 24-month data. Results: Recruitment stopped early at the preplanned interim analysis, with 117 participants in the trial. A total of 99 (85%) participants out of 117 were followed up to 24 months. At 24 months, a significant difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score was not found (95% CI, –7.9 to 0.4; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .08). The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score (mean difference, –10.1; 95% CI, –19.5 to −0.8; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .04) and Patient Global Impression of Change (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .015) were found to significantly favor debridement only. The EQ-5D-5L (mean difference, −0.009; 95% CI, −0.107 to 0.088; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .85) and satisfaction scores (odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to −1.2; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .14) were not significantly different. Complications were evenly matched between groups over 24 months. Conclusion: Participants continued to show better results in the debridement-only group compared with the group who had debridement with the InSpace balloon. Therefore, we do not recommend the subacromial balloon spacer for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251326891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:过去二十年来,随着多种新技术的推出,无法修复的肩袖撕裂的最佳治疗方法仍不确定。两种治疗方案是关节镜清创和肱二头肌腱切开术,或肩峰下球囊垫片。早期试验结果倾向于前者,但两年的结果尚未报告。目的:报告 START:REACTS 试验的 2 年随访结果,该试验研究了肩峰下球囊垫片对肩关节肩袖不可修复性撕裂的治疗效果。研究设计:随机对照试验;证据等级,1。 方法:符合条件的参与者均患有无法修复的肩袖撕裂、需要手术治疗的侵袭性症状以及之前不成功的非手术治疗。参与者按1:1比例随机接受肩峰下间隙清创术和肱二头肌腱切开术(仅清创术)或同样的手术并加用肩峰下球囊垫片(清创术加用装置)。12个月的主要结果已在之前报道过,本文介绍的是24个月的结果。本文采用线性回归模型分析了 24 个月的数据。结果:在预先计划的中期分析中,招募工作提前结束,共有 117 人参与试验。在 117 名参与者中,共有 99 人(85%)接受了 24 个月的随访。24 个月后,牛津肩关节评分未发现明显差异(95% CI,-7.9 至 0.4;P = .08)。西安大略省肩袖评分(平均差异,-10.1;95% CI,-19.5 至 -0.8;P = .04)和患者整体变化印象(几率比,0.4;95% CI,0.2 至 0.8;P = .015)显示,仅清创治疗对患者明显有利。EQ-5D-5L(平均差异,-0.009;95% CI,-0.107 至 0.088;P = .85)和满意度评分(几率比,0.6;95% CI,0.3 至 -1.2 ;P = .14)没有明显差异。在 24 个月内,各组的并发症发生率相当。结论:与使用 InSpace 球囊进行清创术的组别相比,仅进行清创术的组别继续显示出更好的效果。因此,我们不建议将肩峰下球囊垫片用于治疗无法修复的肩袖撕裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-Year Follow-up of a Group-Sequential, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of a Subacromial Balloon Spacer for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears of the Shoulder (START:REACTS)
Background: The best management of irreparable rotator cuff tears remains uncertain, with multiple new techniques introduced over the past 2 decades. Two options for treatment are arthroscopic debridement and biceps tenotomy, or the subacromial balloon spacer. Early trial results favored the former option, but the 2-year results have not yet been reported. Purpose: To report the 2-year follow-up outcomes of the START:REACTS trial, investigating the use of a subacromial balloon spacer for irreparable rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Eligible participants had an irreparable rotator cuff tear, intrusive symptoms requiring surgery, and previous unsuccessful nonoperative care. Participants were randomized 1:1 to debridement of the subacromial space with biceps tenotomy (debridement only) or the same procedure with the addition of the subacromial balloon spacer (debridement with device). The 12-month primary outcome was previously reported; this article presents the 24-month results. Linear regression models were used to analyze the 24-month data. Results: Recruitment stopped early at the preplanned interim analysis, with 117 participants in the trial. A total of 99 (85%) participants out of 117 were followed up to 24 months. At 24 months, a significant difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score was not found (95% CI, –7.9 to 0.4; P = .08). The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score (mean difference, –10.1; 95% CI, –19.5 to −0.8; P = .04) and Patient Global Impression of Change (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .015) were found to significantly favor debridement only. The EQ-5D-5L (mean difference, −0.009; 95% CI, −0.107 to 0.088; P = .85) and satisfaction scores (odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to −1.2; P = .14) were not significantly different. Complications were evenly matched between groups over 24 months. Conclusion: Participants continued to show better results in the debridement-only group compared with the group who had debridement with the InSpace balloon. Therefore, we do not recommend the subacromial balloon spacer for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信