Pablo Alejandro Donati, Pablo E. Otero, Lisa Tarragona, Marcela Tunesi, Manuel Martín Flores, Santiago D´alotto, Arnaldo Dubín
{"title":"用于检测犬体循环休克的脾脏多普勒阻力指数","authors":"Pablo Alejandro Donati, Pablo E. Otero, Lisa Tarragona, Marcela Tunesi, Manuel Martín Flores, Santiago D´alotto, Arnaldo Dubín","doi":"10.1111/vec.13455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the splenic flow resistance index (RI) and its response to a fluid bolus in dogs showing circulatory abnormalities upon hospital admission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective clinical study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Veterinary referral hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Nine dogs with circulatory shock and nine dogs without circulatory abnormalities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>Dogs with circulatory abnormalities received an IV bolus of 30 mL/kg of balanced isotonic crystalloid fluid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>The splenic flow RI and the baseline aortic velocity–time integral of both groups of dogs were evaluated upon hospital admission. Measurements were repeated after the fluid bolus in dogs with circulatory shock. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-test or the Wilcoxon rank sign test was used as appropriate. The median RI in dogs with circulatory shock was higher than that in dogs without hemodynamic disorders (median [interquartile range]: 0.64 [0.62–0.77] vs. 0.54 [0.51–0.54], <i>P</i> < 0.001). The best cutoff value to discriminate between the two groups was 0.61, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–1.00), a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100). After fluid expansion, a significant decrease in the median splenic flow RI was observed (0.57 [0.54–0.71], <i>P</i> = 0.007 vs. basal).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The splenic flow RI may be a dependable tool for identifying circulatory shock in dogs and assessing their response to fluid therapy. Additional studies are required to evaluate the use of this index for the monitoring of organ perfusion, changes in cardiac output, and fluid responsiveness in critically ill dogs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"35 2","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Splenic Doppler Resistance Index for Detection of Circulatory Shock in Dogs\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Alejandro Donati, Pablo E. Otero, Lisa Tarragona, Marcela Tunesi, Manuel Martín Flores, Santiago D´alotto, Arnaldo Dubín\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.13455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the splenic flow resistance index (RI) and its response to a fluid bolus in dogs showing circulatory abnormalities upon hospital admission.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective clinical study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Veterinary referral hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nine dogs with circulatory shock and nine dogs without circulatory abnormalities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interventions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dogs with circulatory abnormalities received an IV bolus of 30 mL/kg of balanced isotonic crystalloid fluid.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The splenic flow RI and the baseline aortic velocity–time integral of both groups of dogs were evaluated upon hospital admission. Measurements were repeated after the fluid bolus in dogs with circulatory shock. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-test or the Wilcoxon rank sign test was used as appropriate. The median RI in dogs with circulatory shock was higher than that in dogs without hemodynamic disorders (median [interquartile range]: 0.64 [0.62–0.77] vs. 0.54 [0.51–0.54], <i>P</i> < 0.001). The best cutoff value to discriminate between the two groups was 0.61, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–1.00), a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100). After fluid expansion, a significant decrease in the median splenic flow RI was observed (0.57 [0.54–0.71], <i>P</i> = 0.007 vs. basal).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The splenic flow RI may be a dependable tool for identifying circulatory shock in dogs and assessing their response to fluid therapy. Additional studies are required to evaluate the use of this index for the monitoring of organ perfusion, changes in cardiac output, and fluid responsiveness in critically ill dogs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"112-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Splenic Doppler Resistance Index for Detection of Circulatory Shock in Dogs
Objective
To assess the splenic flow resistance index (RI) and its response to a fluid bolus in dogs showing circulatory abnormalities upon hospital admission.
Design
Prospective clinical study.
Setting
Veterinary referral hospital.
Animals
Nine dogs with circulatory shock and nine dogs without circulatory abnormalities.
Interventions
Dogs with circulatory abnormalities received an IV bolus of 30 mL/kg of balanced isotonic crystalloid fluid.
Measurements and Main Results
The splenic flow RI and the baseline aortic velocity–time integral of both groups of dogs were evaluated upon hospital admission. Measurements were repeated after the fluid bolus in dogs with circulatory shock. The Mann–Whitney U-test or the Wilcoxon rank sign test was used as appropriate. The median RI in dogs with circulatory shock was higher than that in dogs without hemodynamic disorders (median [interquartile range]: 0.64 [0.62–0.77] vs. 0.54 [0.51–0.54], P < 0.001). The best cutoff value to discriminate between the two groups was 0.61, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–1.00), a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 66.4–100). After fluid expansion, a significant decrease in the median splenic flow RI was observed (0.57 [0.54–0.71], P = 0.007 vs. basal).
Conclusions
The splenic flow RI may be a dependable tool for identifying circulatory shock in dogs and assessing their response to fluid therapy. Additional studies are required to evaluate the use of this index for the monitoring of organ perfusion, changes in cardiac output, and fluid responsiveness in critically ill dogs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues.
The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.