书信形式评估第2版(LFA-2)量表的初步心理测量性质。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Karen Ray, Kim Colyvas, Robyn Evans, Caroline Langlois, Dianne Blackwell, Tennille Johnson, Kylie Wales, Alison E Lane
{"title":"书信形式评估第2版(LFA-2)量表的初步心理测量性质。","authors":"Karen Ray, Kim Colyvas, Robyn Evans, Caroline Langlois, Dianne Blackwell, Tennille Johnson, Kylie Wales, Alison E Lane","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Because handwriting is fundamental to academic success and early literacy development, it is crucial to identify letter formation difficulties. The Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2) was developed to measure letter formation fluency but requires validation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the LFA-2's interrater reliability, construct validity (factor structure), and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cross-sectional analysis of data from a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>School.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventy-eight kindergarten students in Australia (41 boys, 37 girls; M age = 68.5 mo, SD = 4.2) were recruited for construct and concurrent validity studies. A subgroup (n = 16) was used for interrater reliability testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interrater reliability for LFA-2 total was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient = .96, 95% confidence interval [.90, .98]). Interrater agreement coefficients for individual letters scores were good to excellent (Cohen's κ = .71 to 1.00; Gwet's AC1 = .79 to 1.00). Factor analysis established unidimensionality with good total score reliability (ω = .92). Correlations of the LFA-2 total score were moderate to strong with timed and untimed alphabet writing (rs = .32 and rs = .36, respectively), visual-motor integration (rs = .55), fine motor precision (rs = .35), and manual dexterity (rs = .34; all ps < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Preliminary findings support the LFA-2's reliability and validity for assessing letter formation fluency among beginning writers. Multiple raters using the LFA-2 were reliable in their use of the tool (interrater reliability), and item structure was confirmed to be unidimensional (construct validity). The LFA-2 performed as expected compared with other measures (concurrent validity). Research on larger samples is required to verify these results. Plain-Language Summary: Handwriting is an important skill in early education and supports the development of reading and writing skills. To write by hand efficiently, children need to develop movement patterns that allow them to form letters correctly and from memory. Children can advance their literacy skills once they can perform these letter formation patterns automatically. There are limited assessments of beginning writers' letter formation patterns, making it difficult for occupational therapists and teachers to identify children who need more help with their early handwriting. A new tool, the Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2), has been developed to address this need. This study presents the first results of the development and validation of the LFA-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2) Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Ray, Kim Colyvas, Robyn Evans, Caroline Langlois, Dianne Blackwell, Tennille Johnson, Kylie Wales, Alison E Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2025.050893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Because handwriting is fundamental to academic success and early literacy development, it is crucial to identify letter formation difficulties. The Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2) was developed to measure letter formation fluency but requires validation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the LFA-2's interrater reliability, construct validity (factor structure), and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cross-sectional analysis of data from a longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>School.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventy-eight kindergarten students in Australia (41 boys, 37 girls; M age = 68.5 mo, SD = 4.2) were recruited for construct and concurrent validity studies. A subgroup (n = 16) was used for interrater reliability testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interrater reliability for LFA-2 total was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient = .96, 95% confidence interval [.90, .98]). Interrater agreement coefficients for individual letters scores were good to excellent (Cohen's κ = .71 to 1.00; Gwet's AC1 = .79 to 1.00). Factor analysis established unidimensionality with good total score reliability (ω = .92). Correlations of the LFA-2 total score were moderate to strong with timed and untimed alphabet writing (rs = .32 and rs = .36, respectively), visual-motor integration (rs = .55), fine motor precision (rs = .35), and manual dexterity (rs = .34; all ps < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Preliminary findings support the LFA-2's reliability and validity for assessing letter formation fluency among beginning writers. Multiple raters using the LFA-2 were reliable in their use of the tool (interrater reliability), and item structure was confirmed to be unidimensional (construct validity). The LFA-2 performed as expected compared with other measures (concurrent validity). Research on larger samples is required to verify these results. Plain-Language Summary: Handwriting is an important skill in early education and supports the development of reading and writing skills. To write by hand efficiently, children need to develop movement patterns that allow them to form letters correctly and from memory. Children can advance their literacy skills once they can perform these letter formation patterns automatically. There are limited assessments of beginning writers' letter formation patterns, making it difficult for occupational therapists and teachers to identify children who need more help with their early handwriting. A new tool, the Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2), has been developed to address this need. This study presents the first results of the development and validation of the LFA-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050893\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:因为书写是学业成功和早期读写能力发展的基础,识别字母形成的困难是至关重要的。信件形式评估版本2 (LFA-2)的开发是为了衡量信件形成的流畅性,但需要验证。目的:检验LFA-2量表的相互信度、构念效度(因子结构)和并发效度。设计:对来自纵向研究的数据进行观察性横断面分析。背景:学校。参与者:澳大利亚幼儿园学生78人(男生41人,女生37人;(年龄= 68.5个月,SD = 4.2)进行结构和并发效度研究。采用亚组(n = 16)进行间信度检验。结果:LFA-2总分的组间信度极好(组间相关系数=。96、95%置信区间[。90 .98])。个别字母得分的通译者一致系数为好至优秀(Cohen’s κ =)。71 - 1.00;Gwet的AC1 =。79 - 1.00)。因子分析建立了单维性,总分信度良好(ω = .92)。LFA-2总分与定时和非定时字母书写的相关性中至强(rs =。32和rs =。视觉-运动整合(rs = 0.55)、精细运动精度(rs = 0.35)和手灵巧度(rs = 0.34;所有ps结论和相关性:初步研究结果支持LFA-2在评估初级写信人字母构成流畅性方面的信度和效度。使用LFA-2的多个评分者对工具的使用是可靠的(评分者间信度),项目结构被证实是单维的(构念效度)。与其他测量方法(并发效度)相比,LFA-2的表现符合预期。需要对更大的样本进行研究来验证这些结果。简单的语言总结:书写是早期教育中一项重要的技能,支持阅读和写作技能的发展。为了有效地用手写字,孩子们需要发展运动模式,使他们能够根据记忆正确地组成字母。一旦孩子们能自动完成这些字母的组合模式,他们的读写能力就会提高。对初学写字的人的字母形成模式的评估是有限的,这使得职业治疗师和教师很难确定哪些孩子在早期书写方面需要更多的帮助。为了满足这一需求,开发了一种新的工具,即信件形式评估第2版。本研究提出了LFA-2的开发和验证的第一个结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2) Scale.

Importance: Because handwriting is fundamental to academic success and early literacy development, it is crucial to identify letter formation difficulties. The Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2) was developed to measure letter formation fluency but requires validation.

Objective: To examine the LFA-2's interrater reliability, construct validity (factor structure), and concurrent validity.

Design: Observational cross-sectional analysis of data from a longitudinal study.

Setting: School.

Participants: Seventy-eight kindergarten students in Australia (41 boys, 37 girls; M age = 68.5 mo, SD = 4.2) were recruited for construct and concurrent validity studies. A subgroup (n = 16) was used for interrater reliability testing.

Results: Interrater reliability for LFA-2 total was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient = .96, 95% confidence interval [.90, .98]). Interrater agreement coefficients for individual letters scores were good to excellent (Cohen's κ = .71 to 1.00; Gwet's AC1 = .79 to 1.00). Factor analysis established unidimensionality with good total score reliability (ω = .92). Correlations of the LFA-2 total score were moderate to strong with timed and untimed alphabet writing (rs = .32 and rs = .36, respectively), visual-motor integration (rs = .55), fine motor precision (rs = .35), and manual dexterity (rs = .34; all ps < .01).

Conclusions and relevance: Preliminary findings support the LFA-2's reliability and validity for assessing letter formation fluency among beginning writers. Multiple raters using the LFA-2 were reliable in their use of the tool (interrater reliability), and item structure was confirmed to be unidimensional (construct validity). The LFA-2 performed as expected compared with other measures (concurrent validity). Research on larger samples is required to verify these results. Plain-Language Summary: Handwriting is an important skill in early education and supports the development of reading and writing skills. To write by hand efficiently, children need to develop movement patterns that allow them to form letters correctly and from memory. Children can advance their literacy skills once they can perform these letter formation patterns automatically. There are limited assessments of beginning writers' letter formation patterns, making it difficult for occupational therapists and teachers to identify children who need more help with their early handwriting. A new tool, the Letter Form Assessment Version 2 (LFA-2), has been developed to address this need. This study presents the first results of the development and validation of the LFA-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信