Joanna Witkoś, Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka, Grzegorz Błażejewski
{"title":"波兰城市和农村妇女激素避孕知识的比较。","authors":"Joanna Witkoś, Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka, Grzegorz Błażejewski","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Contraception Policy Atlas and its latest 2024 study shows that the availability of contraception in Poland is a meagre 33.5%, the lowest of all European countries. The aim of the research, therefore, was to assess and compare the knowledge of women, living in rural and urban areas of Poland, about the modern methods of the hormonal contraception (HC) they use, includes all hormonal methods (pill, implant, patch, etc.). The study involved 239 women. The research was conducted using an online survey distributed to the public via community forums. The most commonly used method of HC was the combined pill, with 62.27% of the women surveyed using this type of contraception. None of the women surveyed used the emergency contraceptive pill. This finding is concerning given the broader context of contraceptive use in Poland. There were differences in the reasons for contraceptive use according to the place of residence. Women living in rural areas were less likely to use HC to relieve menstrual pain (28.81%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (47.87%), and also less likely to use HC to regulate their menstrual cycle (27.12%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (42.55%). Despite the fact that all the women who participated in this study were using HC, 13.39% stated that they did not know how this type of medication affects the female body. There was a tendency for women living in rural areas (20.34%) to be more likely to say 'don't know' than the women from large towns (9.20%). The most commonly indicated side effect of contraceptives on the female body was an increased risk of thromboembolic events (70.71%).</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0320261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the knowledge of hormonal contraception between women living in urban and rural areas of Poland.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Witkoś, Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka, Grzegorz Błażejewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0320261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Contraception Policy Atlas and its latest 2024 study shows that the availability of contraception in Poland is a meagre 33.5%, the lowest of all European countries. The aim of the research, therefore, was to assess and compare the knowledge of women, living in rural and urban areas of Poland, about the modern methods of the hormonal contraception (HC) they use, includes all hormonal methods (pill, implant, patch, etc.). The study involved 239 women. The research was conducted using an online survey distributed to the public via community forums. The most commonly used method of HC was the combined pill, with 62.27% of the women surveyed using this type of contraception. None of the women surveyed used the emergency contraceptive pill. This finding is concerning given the broader context of contraceptive use in Poland. There were differences in the reasons for contraceptive use according to the place of residence. Women living in rural areas were less likely to use HC to relieve menstrual pain (28.81%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (47.87%), and also less likely to use HC to regulate their menstrual cycle (27.12%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (42.55%). Despite the fact that all the women who participated in this study were using HC, 13.39% stated that they did not know how this type of medication affects the female body. There was a tendency for women living in rural areas (20.34%) to be more likely to say 'don't know' than the women from large towns (9.20%). The most commonly indicated side effect of contraceptives on the female body was an increased risk of thromboembolic events (70.71%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"e0320261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
避孕政策地图集》及其最新的 2024 年研究表明,波兰的避孕药具普及率仅为 33.5%,是所有欧洲国家中最低的。因此,研究的目的是评估和比较居住在波兰农村和城市地区的妇女对其使用的现代荷尔蒙避孕方法(包括所有荷尔蒙方法(避孕药、皮下埋植剂、避孕贴等))的了解程度。这项研究涉及 239 名妇女。研究采用在线调查的方式,通过社区论坛向公众发放调查问卷。最常用的荷尔蒙避孕方法是联合避孕药,62.27%的受访女性使用这种避孕方法。接受调查的妇女中没有人使用紧急避孕药。从波兰避孕药具使用的大背景来看,这一结果令人担忧。居住地不同,使用避孕药具的原因也不同。居住在农村地区的妇女使用 HC 来缓解痛经的比例(28.81%)低于居住在中小城镇的妇女(47.87%),使用 HC 来调节月经周期的比例(27.12%)也低于居住在中小城镇的妇女(42.55%)。尽管所有参与本研究的妇女都在使用 HC,但仍有 13.39%的妇女表示不知道这种药物对女性身体有 何影响。农村妇女(20.34%)比大城市妇女(9.20%)更倾向于说 "不知道"。最常提到的避孕药对女性身体的副作用是增加血栓栓塞事件的风险(70.71%)。
A comparison of the knowledge of hormonal contraception between women living in urban and rural areas of Poland.
The Contraception Policy Atlas and its latest 2024 study shows that the availability of contraception in Poland is a meagre 33.5%, the lowest of all European countries. The aim of the research, therefore, was to assess and compare the knowledge of women, living in rural and urban areas of Poland, about the modern methods of the hormonal contraception (HC) they use, includes all hormonal methods (pill, implant, patch, etc.). The study involved 239 women. The research was conducted using an online survey distributed to the public via community forums. The most commonly used method of HC was the combined pill, with 62.27% of the women surveyed using this type of contraception. None of the women surveyed used the emergency contraceptive pill. This finding is concerning given the broader context of contraceptive use in Poland. There were differences in the reasons for contraceptive use according to the place of residence. Women living in rural areas were less likely to use HC to relieve menstrual pain (28.81%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (47.87%), and also less likely to use HC to regulate their menstrual cycle (27.12%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (42.55%). Despite the fact that all the women who participated in this study were using HC, 13.39% stated that they did not know how this type of medication affects the female body. There was a tendency for women living in rural areas (20.34%) to be more likely to say 'don't know' than the women from large towns (9.20%). The most commonly indicated side effect of contraceptives on the female body was an increased risk of thromboembolic events (70.71%).
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage