静脉注射不同剂量阿替普酶对急性缺血性卒中合并应激性高血糖患者神经损伤生物标志物水平的影响

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wei Yang, Wu Chen, Shengmei Lu
{"title":"静脉注射不同剂量阿替普酶对急性缺血性卒中合并应激性高血糖患者神经损伤生物标志物水平的影响","authors":"Wei Yang, Wu Chen, Shengmei Lu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000041825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous alteplase thrombolysis is a primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the optimal dose remains uncertain in patients with stress hyperglycemia. This study aims to compare the changes in neuroinjury biomarker levels, as well as the efficacy and safety, between low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) and standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase treatment in patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia. This study included 150 patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia, who were divided into a low-dose group (n = 78) and a standard-dose group (n = 72). Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed in terms of neuroinjury biomarkers (neuro-specific enolase, S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, myelin basic protein), neurological recovery (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score), and the incidence of adverse events. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the dose and a favorable prognosis (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2). We found that, within 24 hours post-treatment, the levels of neuroinjury biomarkers (neuro-specific enolase, S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, myelin basic protein) were significantly lower in the low-dose group compared with the standard-dose group (P < .05), and the improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores was more pronounced (P < .01). Three months after thrombolysis, the favorable prognosis rate in the low-dose group was 63.5%, higher than the 47.2% in the standard-dose group, with a near-significant difference (P = .09). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that low-dose treatment was an independent protective factor for a favorable prognosis (odds ratio = 2.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.29-4.23, P = .006). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups, though the proportion of mild bleeding was slightly lower in the low-dose group compared with the standard-dose group. Low-dose intravenous alteplase thrombolysis demonstrates more significant neuroprotective effects in patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia, promoting neurological recovery and improving long-term prognosis without increasing the risk of adverse events. Low-dose thrombolysis may be a safer and more effective treatment option, but its efficacy and safety require further validation through large-scale, randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 13","pages":"e41825"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of different doses of intravenous alteplase on neuroinjury biomarker levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke and stress hyperglycemia.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Yang, Wu Chen, Shengmei Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000041825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intravenous alteplase thrombolysis is a primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the optimal dose remains uncertain in patients with stress hyperglycemia. This study aims to compare the changes in neuroinjury biomarker levels, as well as the efficacy and safety, between low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) and standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase treatment in patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia. This study included 150 patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia, who were divided into a low-dose group (n = 78) and a standard-dose group (n = 72). Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed in terms of neuroinjury biomarkers (neuro-specific enolase, S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, myelin basic protein), neurological recovery (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score), and the incidence of adverse events. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the dose and a favorable prognosis (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2). We found that, within 24 hours post-treatment, the levels of neuroinjury biomarkers (neuro-specific enolase, S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, myelin basic protein) were significantly lower in the low-dose group compared with the standard-dose group (P < .05), and the improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores was more pronounced (P < .01). Three months after thrombolysis, the favorable prognosis rate in the low-dose group was 63.5%, higher than the 47.2% in the standard-dose group, with a near-significant difference (P = .09). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that low-dose treatment was an independent protective factor for a favorable prognosis (odds ratio = 2.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.29-4.23, P = .006). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups, though the proportion of mild bleeding was slightly lower in the low-dose group compared with the standard-dose group. Low-dose intravenous alteplase thrombolysis demonstrates more significant neuroprotective effects in patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia, promoting neurological recovery and improving long-term prognosis without increasing the risk of adverse events. Low-dose thrombolysis may be a safer and more effective treatment option, but its efficacy and safety require further validation through large-scale, randomized controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"104 13\",\"pages\":\"e41825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957619/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041825\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静脉注射阿替普酶溶栓是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的主要治疗方法,但应激性高血糖患者的最佳剂量仍不确定。本研究旨在比较低剂量(0.6 mg/kg)和标准剂量(0.9 mg/kg)静脉注射阿替普酶治疗AIS合并应激性高血糖患者神经损伤生物标志物水平的变化,以及疗效和安全性。本研究纳入AIS合并应激性高血糖患者150例,分为低剂量组(n = 78)和标准剂量组(n = 72)。分析两组患者在神经损伤生物标志物(神经特异性烯醇化酶、S100β、胶质纤维酸性蛋白、髓鞘碱性蛋白)、神经恢复(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分)、临床结局(改良Rankin量表评分)和不良事件发生率方面的差异。采用多因素回归分析评价剂量与预后良好(改良Rankin量表≤2)的关系。我们发现,在治疗后24小时内,与标准剂量组相比,低剂量组的神经损伤生物标志物(神经特异性烯醇化酶、S100β、胶质纤维酸性蛋白、髓鞘碱性蛋白)水平显著降低(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of different doses of intravenous alteplase on neuroinjury biomarker levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke and stress hyperglycemia.

Intravenous alteplase thrombolysis is a primary treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the optimal dose remains uncertain in patients with stress hyperglycemia. This study aims to compare the changes in neuroinjury biomarker levels, as well as the efficacy and safety, between low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) and standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase treatment in patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia. This study included 150 patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia, who were divided into a low-dose group (n = 78) and a standard-dose group (n = 72). Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed in terms of neuroinjury biomarkers (neuro-specific enolase, S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, myelin basic protein), neurological recovery (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score), and the incidence of adverse events. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the dose and a favorable prognosis (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2). We found that, within 24 hours post-treatment, the levels of neuroinjury biomarkers (neuro-specific enolase, S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein, myelin basic protein) were significantly lower in the low-dose group compared with the standard-dose group (P < .05), and the improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores was more pronounced (P < .01). Three months after thrombolysis, the favorable prognosis rate in the low-dose group was 63.5%, higher than the 47.2% in the standard-dose group, with a near-significant difference (P = .09). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that low-dose treatment was an independent protective factor for a favorable prognosis (odds ratio = 2.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.29-4.23, P = .006). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups, though the proportion of mild bleeding was slightly lower in the low-dose group compared with the standard-dose group. Low-dose intravenous alteplase thrombolysis demonstrates more significant neuroprotective effects in patients with AIS and stress hyperglycemia, promoting neurological recovery and improving long-term prognosis without increasing the risk of adverse events. Low-dose thrombolysis may be a safer and more effective treatment option, but its efficacy and safety require further validation through large-scale, randomized controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信