Ashley Howes分析在评估扩张电位中的可靠性:锥束计算机断层扫描研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bhavika Agrawal, Bhadrinath Srinivasan, Sridevi Padmanabhan
{"title":"Ashley Howes分析在评估扩张电位中的可靠性:锥束计算机断层扫描研究。","authors":"Bhavika Agrawal, Bhadrinath Srinivasan, Sridevi Padmanabhan","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06287-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In recent times orthodontic treatment trends has swung towards non -extraction treatment. The Ashley Howes analysis evaluates the possibility of expansion based on the apical base. The transversal arch expansion potential of the mandibular arch also plays a role when considering maxillary expansion and should not be disregarded. Although, meant for both maxillary and mandibular arches, the subsequent focus of the analysis had mostly been in the maxillary arch. The aim of this study was to correlate the Ashley Howes analysis with buccal bone thickness at different vertical levels, tooth inclination and apical base width at the region of first premolars measured on CBCT images in both maxillary and mandibular arches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study design evaluated pretreatment maxillary and mandibular study models and CBCTs of 84 patient records selected for the study. Based on the Ashley Howes analysis they were categorized into Group I (expansion not possible) and Group II (Expansion possible). The independent t-test was used for intergroup comparisons of CBCT parameters and Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship between expansion potential and CBCT parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both maxillary and mandibular arches, Group II was characterized by greater buccal bone thickness at all vertical levels, greater apical base width and less premolar inclination when compared to groups without expansion potential although these differences were not statistically significant except for the mandibular apical base width. Although correlation between expansion potential and buccal bone thickness was not statistically significant in both the arches, it showed a positive correlation to apical base width and a negative correlation with premolar inclination in the mandibular arch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ashley Howes analysis appears to reflect the relevant differences between extraction and non-extraction cases particularly in the mandibular arch.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Ashley Howes analysis could still be an effective tool in evaluating expansion potential and should be performed in both maxillary and mandibular arches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 4","pages":"211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Ashley Howes analysis in evaluating expansion potential: a cone beam computed tomography study.\",\"authors\":\"Bhavika Agrawal, Bhadrinath Srinivasan, Sridevi Padmanabhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06287-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In recent times orthodontic treatment trends has swung towards non -extraction treatment. The Ashley Howes analysis evaluates the possibility of expansion based on the apical base. The transversal arch expansion potential of the mandibular arch also plays a role when considering maxillary expansion and should not be disregarded. Although, meant for both maxillary and mandibular arches, the subsequent focus of the analysis had mostly been in the maxillary arch. The aim of this study was to correlate the Ashley Howes analysis with buccal bone thickness at different vertical levels, tooth inclination and apical base width at the region of first premolars measured on CBCT images in both maxillary and mandibular arches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study design evaluated pretreatment maxillary and mandibular study models and CBCTs of 84 patient records selected for the study. Based on the Ashley Howes analysis they were categorized into Group I (expansion not possible) and Group II (Expansion possible). The independent t-test was used for intergroup comparisons of CBCT parameters and Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship between expansion potential and CBCT parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both maxillary and mandibular arches, Group II was characterized by greater buccal bone thickness at all vertical levels, greater apical base width and less premolar inclination when compared to groups without expansion potential although these differences were not statistically significant except for the mandibular apical base width. Although correlation between expansion potential and buccal bone thickness was not statistically significant in both the arches, it showed a positive correlation to apical base width and a negative correlation with premolar inclination in the mandibular arch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ashley Howes analysis appears to reflect the relevant differences between extraction and non-extraction cases particularly in the mandibular arch.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Ashley Howes analysis could still be an effective tool in evaluating expansion potential and should be performed in both maxillary and mandibular arches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06287-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06287-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,正畸治疗的趋势已转向非拔牙治疗。Ashley Howes的分析基于顶点基础来评估扩张的可能性。在考虑上颌扩张时,下颌弓的横弓扩张潜力也起着不可忽视的作用。虽然指的是上颌弓和下颌弓,但随后的分析重点主要集中在上颌弓。本研究的目的是将Ashley Howes分析与在上颌和下颌弓的CBCT图像上测量的第一前磨牙区域不同垂直水平的颊骨厚度、牙齿倾斜度和根尖基宽相关联。材料和方法:本回顾性研究设计评估了84例患者的上颌和下颌骨预处理研究模型和cbct。根据Ashley Howes的分析,它们被分为I组(不可能扩张)和II组(可能扩张)。CBCT参数组间比较采用独立t检验,扩展电位与CBCT参数的关系采用Pearson相关检验。结果:在上颌和下颌弓中,与没有扩张潜力的组相比,II组在所有垂直水平上都具有更大的颊骨厚度,更大的尖基宽度和更小的前磨牙倾斜度,尽管这些差异除下颌尖基宽度外无统计学意义。扩张电位与颊骨厚度的相关性无统计学意义,但与尖基宽度呈正相关,与前磨牙倾斜度呈负相关。结论:Ashley Howes的分析似乎反映了拔牙和非拔牙病例之间的相关差异,特别是在下颌弓。临床相关性:Ashley Howes分析仍然是评估扩张潜力的有效工具,应该在上颌和下颌弓中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Ashley Howes analysis in evaluating expansion potential: a cone beam computed tomography study.

Objectives: In recent times orthodontic treatment trends has swung towards non -extraction treatment. The Ashley Howes analysis evaluates the possibility of expansion based on the apical base. The transversal arch expansion potential of the mandibular arch also plays a role when considering maxillary expansion and should not be disregarded. Although, meant for both maxillary and mandibular arches, the subsequent focus of the analysis had mostly been in the maxillary arch. The aim of this study was to correlate the Ashley Howes analysis with buccal bone thickness at different vertical levels, tooth inclination and apical base width at the region of first premolars measured on CBCT images in both maxillary and mandibular arches.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study design evaluated pretreatment maxillary and mandibular study models and CBCTs of 84 patient records selected for the study. Based on the Ashley Howes analysis they were categorized into Group I (expansion not possible) and Group II (Expansion possible). The independent t-test was used for intergroup comparisons of CBCT parameters and Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship between expansion potential and CBCT parameters.

Results: In both maxillary and mandibular arches, Group II was characterized by greater buccal bone thickness at all vertical levels, greater apical base width and less premolar inclination when compared to groups without expansion potential although these differences were not statistically significant except for the mandibular apical base width. Although correlation between expansion potential and buccal bone thickness was not statistically significant in both the arches, it showed a positive correlation to apical base width and a negative correlation with premolar inclination in the mandibular arch.

Conclusion: The Ashley Howes analysis appears to reflect the relevant differences between extraction and non-extraction cases particularly in the mandibular arch.

Clinical relevance: Ashley Howes analysis could still be an effective tool in evaluating expansion potential and should be performed in both maxillary and mandibular arches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信