从患者-医生-付款人的角度对基础胰岛素的偏好、期望和态度:意大利糖尿病学会的多利益相关者调查(ITA4P研究)

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Gian Paolo Fadini, Stefano Ciardullo, Gianluca Perseghin, Carla Giordano, Ernesto Maddaloni, Raffaella Buzzetti, Mariangela Ghiani, Angelo Avogaro
{"title":"从患者-医生-付款人的角度对基础胰岛素的偏好、期望和态度:意大利糖尿病学会的多利益相关者调查(ITA4P研究)","authors":"Gian Paolo Fadini, Stefano Ciardullo, Gianluca Perseghin, Carla Giordano, Ernesto Maddaloni, Raffaella Buzzetti, Mariangela Ghiani, Angelo Avogaro","doi":"10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes management often involves complex insulin regimens, posing significant challenges for patients and healthcare systems. Weekly basal insulin formulations aim to simplify treatment, reduce injection frequency, and improve adherence and quality of life. This study explored the beliefs, preferences and attitudes of patients, physicians and payers regarding current basal insulin therapy and weekly insulin formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey with structured questionnaires was developed for multiple stakeholders: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, physicians and payers. Participants provided self-reported insights into basal insulin therapy and perceptions of weekly formulations. Results are presented in a descriptive non-analytical way.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1094 patients, 468 physicians and 100 payers participated. Patients reported moderate satisfaction with current insulin therapy, with lower satisfaction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The major burdens identified were daily injections and fear of hypoglycaemia, with weekly insulin seen as a promising alternative. Physicians prioritized glycaemic control goals, while patients emphasized independence and quality of life. Payers valued adherence and hypoglycaemia avoidance but raised concerns about costs and education needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to this multi-stakeholder survey, weekly basal insulin offers a promising approach to reduce treatment burden and improve adherence and quality of life. Addressing concerns about safety, efficacy and cost will be critical to its successful adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences, Expectations and Attitudes on Basal Insulin from Patient-Physician-Payer Perspective: A Multi-stakeholder Survey by the Italian Diabetes Society (ITA4P Study).\",\"authors\":\"Gian Paolo Fadini, Stefano Ciardullo, Gianluca Perseghin, Carla Giordano, Ernesto Maddaloni, Raffaella Buzzetti, Mariangela Ghiani, Angelo Avogaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes management often involves complex insulin regimens, posing significant challenges for patients and healthcare systems. Weekly basal insulin formulations aim to simplify treatment, reduce injection frequency, and improve adherence and quality of life. This study explored the beliefs, preferences and attitudes of patients, physicians and payers regarding current basal insulin therapy and weekly insulin formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey with structured questionnaires was developed for multiple stakeholders: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, physicians and payers. Participants provided self-reported insights into basal insulin therapy and perceptions of weekly formulations. Results are presented in a descriptive non-analytical way.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1094 patients, 468 physicians and 100 payers participated. Patients reported moderate satisfaction with current insulin therapy, with lower satisfaction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The major burdens identified were daily injections and fear of hypoglycaemia, with weekly insulin seen as a promising alternative. Physicians prioritized glycaemic control goals, while patients emphasized independence and quality of life. Payers valued adherence and hypoglycaemia avoidance but raised concerns about costs and education needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to this multi-stakeholder survey, weekly basal insulin offers a promising approach to reduce treatment burden and improve adherence and quality of life. Addressing concerns about safety, efficacy and cost will be critical to its successful adoption in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病管理通常涉及复杂的胰岛素方案,对患者和医疗保健系统构成重大挑战。每周基础胰岛素配方旨在简化治疗,减少注射频率,提高依从性和生活质量。本研究探讨了患者、医生和付款人对当前基础胰岛素治疗和每周胰岛素配方的信念、偏好和态度。方法:对1型或2型糖尿病患者、医生和付款人等多个利益相关者进行了结构化问卷调查。参与者提供了对基础胰岛素治疗的自我报告见解和每周配方的看法。结果以描述性非分析性的方式呈现。结果:共有1094名患者、468名医生和100名支付方参与。患者报告对当前胰岛素治疗的满意度中等,2型糖尿病患者满意度较低。确定的主要负担是每日注射和对低血糖的恐惧,每周胰岛素被视为有希望的替代方案。医生优先考虑血糖控制目标,而患者则强调独立性和生活质量。支付方重视坚持治疗和避免低血糖,但也提出了对成本和教育需求的担忧。结论:根据这项多方利益相关者调查,每周基础胰岛素治疗提供了一种有希望的方法来减轻治疗负担,提高依从性和生活质量。解决对安全性、有效性和成本的担忧将是其在临床实践中成功采用的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences, Expectations and Attitudes on Basal Insulin from Patient-Physician-Payer Perspective: A Multi-stakeholder Survey by the Italian Diabetes Society (ITA4P Study).

Introduction: Diabetes management often involves complex insulin regimens, posing significant challenges for patients and healthcare systems. Weekly basal insulin formulations aim to simplify treatment, reduce injection frequency, and improve adherence and quality of life. This study explored the beliefs, preferences and attitudes of patients, physicians and payers regarding current basal insulin therapy and weekly insulin formulations.

Methods: An online survey with structured questionnaires was developed for multiple stakeholders: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, physicians and payers. Participants provided self-reported insights into basal insulin therapy and perceptions of weekly formulations. Results are presented in a descriptive non-analytical way.

Results: A total of 1094 patients, 468 physicians and 100 payers participated. Patients reported moderate satisfaction with current insulin therapy, with lower satisfaction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The major burdens identified were daily injections and fear of hypoglycaemia, with weekly insulin seen as a promising alternative. Physicians prioritized glycaemic control goals, while patients emphasized independence and quality of life. Payers valued adherence and hypoglycaemia avoidance but raised concerns about costs and education needs.

Conclusions: According to this multi-stakeholder survey, weekly basal insulin offers a promising approach to reduce treatment burden and improve adherence and quality of life. Addressing concerns about safety, efficacy and cost will be critical to its successful adoption in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信