ECMO患者临床试验新的纵向顺序结局的发展。

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ary Serpa Neto, Lisa Higgins, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Lindsay Berry, Elizabeth Ryan, Stephane Heritier, Shannah Anderson, Judit Orosz, Aidan Burrell, Zoe McQuilten, Priya Nair, Carol L Hodgson
{"title":"ECMO患者临床试验新的纵向顺序结局的发展。","authors":"Ary Serpa Neto, Lisa Higgins, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Lindsay Berry, Elizabeth Ryan, Stephane Heritier, Shannah Anderson, Judit Orosz, Aidan Burrell, Zoe McQuilten, Priya Nair, Carol L Hodgson","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Randomised clinical trials in intensive care often prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report and evaluate the 'Daily Organ Support for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)', the DOSE outcome. This is a new longitudinal ordinal outcome for clinical trials in patients receiving ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicentre study in 28 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between February 2019 and September 2023 and who underwent any type of ECMO were included. The DOSE outcome was created considering: 1) death; 2) on ECMO; 3) ventilated not on ECMO; 4) in ICU but not ventilated; 5) in hospital ward; and 6) discharged from the hospital. DOSE was developed in collaboration with consumers and other stakeholders, and validated against death and new disability at six months. Simulations were performed to compare the power obtained against 28-day mortality alone.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1375 patients who received ECMO (median age, 52 years; 34% female), at day 90, 42%, 29% and 66% of the patients receiving VA-, VV-ECMO, or eCPR were deceased, respectively. DOSE accurately predicted death and new disability at six months (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.800). With a sample size of 400 per arm and an odds ratio of 1.20, DOSE provided 56% more power than an analysis considering 28-day mortality alone (36% vs. 91%) in simulations of a two-arm clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOSE outcome performed well compared to a patient-centred outcome. Compared to 28-day mortality, DOSE provided more statistical power in a simulated two-arm clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a New Longitudinal Ordinal Outcome for Clinical Trials in ECMO Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ary Serpa Neto, Lisa Higgins, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Lindsay Berry, Elizabeth Ryan, Stephane Heritier, Shannah Anderson, Judit Orosz, Aidan Burrell, Zoe McQuilten, Priya Nair, Carol L Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Randomised clinical trials in intensive care often prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report and evaluate the 'Daily Organ Support for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)', the DOSE outcome. This is a new longitudinal ordinal outcome for clinical trials in patients receiving ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicentre study in 28 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between February 2019 and September 2023 and who underwent any type of ECMO were included. The DOSE outcome was created considering: 1) death; 2) on ECMO; 3) ventilated not on ECMO; 4) in ICU but not ventilated; 5) in hospital ward; and 6) discharged from the hospital. DOSE was developed in collaboration with consumers and other stakeholders, and validated against death and new disability at six months. Simulations were performed to compare the power obtained against 28-day mortality alone.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1375 patients who received ECMO (median age, 52 years; 34% female), at day 90, 42%, 29% and 66% of the patients receiving VA-, VV-ECMO, or eCPR were deceased, respectively. DOSE accurately predicted death and new disability at six months (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.800). With a sample size of 400 per arm and an odds ratio of 1.20, DOSE provided 56% more power than an analysis considering 28-day mortality alone (36% vs. 91%) in simulations of a two-arm clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOSE outcome performed well compared to a patient-centred outcome. Compared to 28-day mortality, DOSE provided more statistical power in a simulated two-arm clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:重症监护的随机临床试验往往优先考虑以疾病为中心的结果,而不是以患者为中心的结果。目的:报告和评价“体外膜氧合(ECMO)患者每日器官支持”的DOSE结果。这是接受体外膜肺栓塞患者临床试验的一个新的纵向顺序结局。方法:在澳大利亚和新西兰的28家医院进行前瞻性、多中心研究。纳入了2019年2月至2023年9月期间入住参与ICU并接受任何类型ECMO的成年患者。DOSE的结果是考虑到:1)死亡;2) ECMO;3)不进行ECMO通气;4) ICU内不通气;5)住院病房;然后出院了。剂量是与消费者和其他利益攸关方合作开发的,并在6个月后对死亡和新残疾进行了验证。进行了模拟以比较获得的功率与单独的28天死亡率。测量和主要结果:1375例接受ECMO的患者(中位年龄52岁;在第90天,分别有42%、29%和66%接受VA-、VV-ECMO或eCPR的患者死亡。剂量准确预测6个月时的死亡和新发残疾(曲线下面积[AUC] > 0.800)。在模拟两组临床试验中,剂量组的样本量为每组400人,优势比为1.20,与单独考虑28天死亡率的分析相比,剂量组提供了56%的优势(36%对91%)。结论:与以患者为中心的结果相比,DOSE结果表现良好。与28天死亡率相比,DOSE在模拟的双臂临床试验中提供了更大的统计能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a New Longitudinal Ordinal Outcome for Clinical Trials in ECMO Patients.

Rationale: Randomised clinical trials in intensive care often prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes.

Objective: To report and evaluate the 'Daily Organ Support for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)', the DOSE outcome. This is a new longitudinal ordinal outcome for clinical trials in patients receiving ECMO.

Methods: Prospective, multicentre study in 28 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between February 2019 and September 2023 and who underwent any type of ECMO were included. The DOSE outcome was created considering: 1) death; 2) on ECMO; 3) ventilated not on ECMO; 4) in ICU but not ventilated; 5) in hospital ward; and 6) discharged from the hospital. DOSE was developed in collaboration with consumers and other stakeholders, and validated against death and new disability at six months. Simulations were performed to compare the power obtained against 28-day mortality alone.

Measurements and main results: Among 1375 patients who received ECMO (median age, 52 years; 34% female), at day 90, 42%, 29% and 66% of the patients receiving VA-, VV-ECMO, or eCPR were deceased, respectively. DOSE accurately predicted death and new disability at six months (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.800). With a sample size of 400 per arm and an odds ratio of 1.20, DOSE provided 56% more power than an analysis considering 28-day mortality alone (36% vs. 91%) in simulations of a two-arm clinical trial.

Conclusions: The DOSE outcome performed well compared to a patient-centred outcome. Compared to 28-day mortality, DOSE provided more statistical power in a simulated two-arm clinical trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信