Ary Serpa Neto, Lisa Higgins, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Lindsay Berry, Elizabeth Ryan, Stephane Heritier, Shannah Anderson, Judit Orosz, Aidan Burrell, Zoe McQuilten, Priya Nair, Carol L Hodgson
{"title":"ECMO患者临床试验新的纵向顺序结局的发展。","authors":"Ary Serpa Neto, Lisa Higgins, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Lindsay Berry, Elizabeth Ryan, Stephane Heritier, Shannah Anderson, Judit Orosz, Aidan Burrell, Zoe McQuilten, Priya Nair, Carol L Hodgson","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Randomised clinical trials in intensive care often prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report and evaluate the 'Daily Organ Support for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)', the DOSE outcome. This is a new longitudinal ordinal outcome for clinical trials in patients receiving ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicentre study in 28 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between February 2019 and September 2023 and who underwent any type of ECMO were included. The DOSE outcome was created considering: 1) death; 2) on ECMO; 3) ventilated not on ECMO; 4) in ICU but not ventilated; 5) in hospital ward; and 6) discharged from the hospital. DOSE was developed in collaboration with consumers and other stakeholders, and validated against death and new disability at six months. Simulations were performed to compare the power obtained against 28-day mortality alone.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1375 patients who received ECMO (median age, 52 years; 34% female), at day 90, 42%, 29% and 66% of the patients receiving VA-, VV-ECMO, or eCPR were deceased, respectively. DOSE accurately predicted death and new disability at six months (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.800). With a sample size of 400 per arm and an odds ratio of 1.20, DOSE provided 56% more power than an analysis considering 28-day mortality alone (36% vs. 91%) in simulations of a two-arm clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOSE outcome performed well compared to a patient-centred outcome. Compared to 28-day mortality, DOSE provided more statistical power in a simulated two-arm clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a New Longitudinal Ordinal Outcome for Clinical Trials in ECMO Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ary Serpa Neto, Lisa Higgins, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Lindsay Berry, Elizabeth Ryan, Stephane Heritier, Shannah Anderson, Judit Orosz, Aidan Burrell, Zoe McQuilten, Priya Nair, Carol L Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Randomised clinical trials in intensive care often prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report and evaluate the 'Daily Organ Support for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)', the DOSE outcome. This is a new longitudinal ordinal outcome for clinical trials in patients receiving ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicentre study in 28 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between February 2019 and September 2023 and who underwent any type of ECMO were included. The DOSE outcome was created considering: 1) death; 2) on ECMO; 3) ventilated not on ECMO; 4) in ICU but not ventilated; 5) in hospital ward; and 6) discharged from the hospital. DOSE was developed in collaboration with consumers and other stakeholders, and validated against death and new disability at six months. Simulations were performed to compare the power obtained against 28-day mortality alone.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 1375 patients who received ECMO (median age, 52 years; 34% female), at day 90, 42%, 29% and 66% of the patients receiving VA-, VV-ECMO, or eCPR were deceased, respectively. DOSE accurately predicted death and new disability at six months (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.800). With a sample size of 400 per arm and an odds ratio of 1.20, DOSE provided 56% more power than an analysis considering 28-day mortality alone (36% vs. 91%) in simulations of a two-arm clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOSE outcome performed well compared to a patient-centred outcome. Compared to 28-day mortality, DOSE provided more statistical power in a simulated two-arm clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202408-1582OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a New Longitudinal Ordinal Outcome for Clinical Trials in ECMO Patients.
Rationale: Randomised clinical trials in intensive care often prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centred outcomes.
Objective: To report and evaluate the 'Daily Organ Support for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)', the DOSE outcome. This is a new longitudinal ordinal outcome for clinical trials in patients receiving ECMO.
Methods: Prospective, multicentre study in 28 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between February 2019 and September 2023 and who underwent any type of ECMO were included. The DOSE outcome was created considering: 1) death; 2) on ECMO; 3) ventilated not on ECMO; 4) in ICU but not ventilated; 5) in hospital ward; and 6) discharged from the hospital. DOSE was developed in collaboration with consumers and other stakeholders, and validated against death and new disability at six months. Simulations were performed to compare the power obtained against 28-day mortality alone.
Measurements and main results: Among 1375 patients who received ECMO (median age, 52 years; 34% female), at day 90, 42%, 29% and 66% of the patients receiving VA-, VV-ECMO, or eCPR were deceased, respectively. DOSE accurately predicted death and new disability at six months (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.800). With a sample size of 400 per arm and an odds ratio of 1.20, DOSE provided 56% more power than an analysis considering 28-day mortality alone (36% vs. 91%) in simulations of a two-arm clinical trial.
Conclusions: The DOSE outcome performed well compared to a patient-centred outcome. Compared to 28-day mortality, DOSE provided more statistical power in a simulated two-arm clinical trial.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.