Filipe Zanferari , Thiago Henrique A. Vendramini , Carlos E.C. Consentini , Mariana F. Rentas , Rodrigo Gardinal , Gustavo D. Calomeni , Luciana N. Rennó , Caio S. Takiya , Alanne T. Nunes , Francisco P. Rennó
{"title":"优化泌乳奶牛粪便产量估算:标记选择、日粮和方法学因素的影响","authors":"Filipe Zanferari , Thiago Henrique A. Vendramini , Carlos E.C. Consentini , Mariana F. Rentas , Rodrigo Gardinal , Gustavo D. Calomeni , Luciana N. Rennó , Caio S. Takiya , Alanne T. Nunes , Francisco P. Rennó","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy, precision, and robustness of fecal output estimates using different external markers (Cr₂O₃ and TiO₂) and internal markers [indigestible dry matter (iDM), neutral detergent fiber (iNDF), and acid detergent fiber (iADF)]. Eight multiparous Holstein cows (144 ± 39 DIM, 34.3 ± 5.10 kg/d milk yield, and 592 ± 57 kg BW) with ruminal cannulas were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 23-d periods. The diets followed a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: whole raw soybean inclusion (WRS; 0 and 140 g/kg diet DM) and chitosan supplementation (CHI; 0 and 4 g/kg DM). Total fecal collection was performed during 24, 48, or 72 h. External markers were administered daily (15 g/d) in the rumen. Internal marker content was determined after 288-h of incubation in polyester bags with 12 and 25 µm porosity, F57 bags with 25 µm porosity, and non-woven fabric bags with heterogeneous porosity. Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> provided accurate and precise estimates; however, its recovery increased with increasing dietary ether extract. TiO<sub>2</sub> exhibited incomplete recovery, regardless of the length of sampling period, resulting in low accuracy and precision. Internal marker recovery depended on the chitosan inclusion and bag type. Without chitosan, iNDF in polyester bags (12 or 25 µm) achieved complete recovery, producing the most accurate, precise, and robust estimates. The lack of accuracy and precision of TiO₂ and some internal markers (iDM and iADF) affect apparent total-tract digestibility estimates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 116311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing fecal output estimation in lactating cows: Effects of marker selection, diet, and methodological factors\",\"authors\":\"Filipe Zanferari , Thiago Henrique A. Vendramini , Carlos E.C. Consentini , Mariana F. Rentas , Rodrigo Gardinal , Gustavo D. Calomeni , Luciana N. Rennó , Caio S. Takiya , Alanne T. Nunes , Francisco P. Rennó\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy, precision, and robustness of fecal output estimates using different external markers (Cr₂O₃ and TiO₂) and internal markers [indigestible dry matter (iDM), neutral detergent fiber (iNDF), and acid detergent fiber (iADF)]. Eight multiparous Holstein cows (144 ± 39 DIM, 34.3 ± 5.10 kg/d milk yield, and 592 ± 57 kg BW) with ruminal cannulas were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 23-d periods. The diets followed a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: whole raw soybean inclusion (WRS; 0 and 140 g/kg diet DM) and chitosan supplementation (CHI; 0 and 4 g/kg DM). Total fecal collection was performed during 24, 48, or 72 h. External markers were administered daily (15 g/d) in the rumen. Internal marker content was determined after 288-h of incubation in polyester bags with 12 and 25 µm porosity, F57 bags with 25 µm porosity, and non-woven fabric bags with heterogeneous porosity. Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> provided accurate and precise estimates; however, its recovery increased with increasing dietary ether extract. TiO<sub>2</sub> exhibited incomplete recovery, regardless of the length of sampling period, resulting in low accuracy and precision. Internal marker recovery depended on the chitosan inclusion and bag type. Without chitosan, iNDF in polyester bags (12 or 25 µm) achieved complete recovery, producing the most accurate, precise, and robust estimates. The lack of accuracy and precision of TiO₂ and some internal markers (iDM and iADF) affect apparent total-tract digestibility estimates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"324 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing fecal output estimation in lactating cows: Effects of marker selection, diet, and methodological factors
A study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy, precision, and robustness of fecal output estimates using different external markers (Cr₂O₃ and TiO₂) and internal markers [indigestible dry matter (iDM), neutral detergent fiber (iNDF), and acid detergent fiber (iADF)]. Eight multiparous Holstein cows (144 ± 39 DIM, 34.3 ± 5.10 kg/d milk yield, and 592 ± 57 kg BW) with ruminal cannulas were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 23-d periods. The diets followed a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: whole raw soybean inclusion (WRS; 0 and 140 g/kg diet DM) and chitosan supplementation (CHI; 0 and 4 g/kg DM). Total fecal collection was performed during 24, 48, or 72 h. External markers were administered daily (15 g/d) in the rumen. Internal marker content was determined after 288-h of incubation in polyester bags with 12 and 25 µm porosity, F57 bags with 25 µm porosity, and non-woven fabric bags with heterogeneous porosity. Cr2O3 provided accurate and precise estimates; however, its recovery increased with increasing dietary ether extract. TiO2 exhibited incomplete recovery, regardless of the length of sampling period, resulting in low accuracy and precision. Internal marker recovery depended on the chitosan inclusion and bag type. Without chitosan, iNDF in polyester bags (12 or 25 µm) achieved complete recovery, producing the most accurate, precise, and robust estimates. The lack of accuracy and precision of TiO₂ and some internal markers (iDM and iADF) affect apparent total-tract digestibility estimates.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.