Evangelos Bellos
{"title":"Thermodynamic analysis of a novel organic Rankine cycle operating with various thermal energy sources","authors":"Evangelos Bellos","doi":"10.1016/j.cles.2025.100184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The goal of this work lies in the investigation of a highly efficient organic Rankine cycle (ORC) under operation with various heat sources. The suggested cycle includes recuperation, regeneration and reheating, called RRR-ORC, and it is studied for operation with biomass, solar thermal collectors (evacuated flat plate units) and waste heat recovery. The analysis is parametric by investigating different design scenarios, as well as there is optimization aiming at the maximization of energy efficiency. Moreover, the reported results are directly compared with the respective with the recuperative ORC (benchmark scenario). The results prove that the RRR-ORC is a more efficient choice than the Recuperative-ORC thermodynamically and for operation with biomass and solar thermal collectors in all the studied scenarios. However, the use of the waste heat source for feeding the cycle is beneficial in most of the studied cases and not in all the examined scenarios; there are some reported reductions in the performance in the scenarios with low waste heat source temperatures. In the typical scenario of T<sub>sat</sub>=110 °C and T<sub>cond</sub>=40 °C, the energy efficiency enhancement compared to the recuperative cycle for the biomass-based system is 20.89 %, for the solar-based system is 20.22 %, while for the waste heat recovery system is only 2.72 %. However, it is useful to add that the reported exergy efficiency values with the waste heat recovery systems are significantly higher compared to the biomass and solar-based configurations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100252,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Energy Systems","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783125000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目标是研究在各种热源条件下运行的高效有机朗肯循环(ORC)。所建议的循环包括蓄热、再生和再加热,称为 RRR-ORC,研究了生物质、太阳能集热器(抽真空平板装置)和废热回收的运行情况。通过研究不同的设计方案,进行了参数分析,并以能源效率最大化为目标进行了优化。此外,所报告的结果还直接与各自的换热式 ORC(基准方案)进行了比较。结果证明,在所有研究方案中,RRR-ORC 在热力学方面以及与生物质和太阳能集热器一起运行时,都比蓄热式 ORC 更有效。不过,在大多数研究案例中,利用废热源为循环供能是有益的,但并非在所有研究方案中都是如此;据报道,在废热源温度较低的方案中,性能有所下降。在 Tsat=110 °C、Tcond=40 °C 的典型情况下,生物质系统的能源效率比蓄热式循环提高了 20.89%,太阳能系统提高了 20.22%,而废热回收系统仅提高了 2.72%。不过,需要补充的是,与生物质和太阳能系统相比,余热回收系统的放能效值要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Thermodynamic analysis of a novel organic Rankine cycle operating with various thermal energy sources

Thermodynamic analysis of a novel organic Rankine cycle operating with various thermal energy sources
The goal of this work lies in the investigation of a highly efficient organic Rankine cycle (ORC) under operation with various heat sources. The suggested cycle includes recuperation, regeneration and reheating, called RRR-ORC, and it is studied for operation with biomass, solar thermal collectors (evacuated flat plate units) and waste heat recovery. The analysis is parametric by investigating different design scenarios, as well as there is optimization aiming at the maximization of energy efficiency. Moreover, the reported results are directly compared with the respective with the recuperative ORC (benchmark scenario). The results prove that the RRR-ORC is a more efficient choice than the Recuperative-ORC thermodynamically and for operation with biomass and solar thermal collectors in all the studied scenarios. However, the use of the waste heat source for feeding the cycle is beneficial in most of the studied cases and not in all the examined scenarios; there are some reported reductions in the performance in the scenarios with low waste heat source temperatures. In the typical scenario of Tsat=110 °C and Tcond=40 °C, the energy efficiency enhancement compared to the recuperative cycle for the biomass-based system is 20.89 %, for the solar-based system is 20.22 %, while for the waste heat recovery system is only 2.72 %. However, it is useful to add that the reported exergy efficiency values with the waste heat recovery systems are significantly higher compared to the biomass and solar-based configurations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信