枪支风险评估:临床评估措施的快速回顾

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Christopher J Collins, Alexis Speck Glennon, Patricia Logan-Greene, Mickey Sperlich, EunSook Seong
{"title":"枪支风险评估:临床评估措施的快速回顾","authors":"Christopher J Collins, Alexis Speck Glennon, Patricia Logan-Greene, Mickey Sperlich, EunSook Seong","doi":"10.1177/10497315251329998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Social workers play a crucial role in assessing risks for harm to self and others, including firearm access. Given the growing concern of firearm violence, standardized assessment tools addressing firearm risks could improve social workers’ assessments. Method: This rapid review identifies and evaluates available clinical assessment tools that include items related to firearms. Result: After searching five electronic databases, 15 assessment measures were identified and categorized into five domains: aggressive and violent behaviors, delinquent behaviors, familial attitudes and beliefs, dating or partner violence, and suicide. Discussion: The review highlights the limitations of current tools and underscores the importance of standardized assessments in providing social workers with validated frameworks to inform clinical decision making, while also calling for the development of more comprehensive, culturally informed measures. The review concludes with recommendations and suggestions for incorporating antiracist practices and cultural humility into clinical practice to address firearm-related risks and enhance safety.","PeriodicalId":47993,"journal":{"name":"Research on Social Work Practice","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing for Firearm Risks: A Rapid Review of Clinical Assessment Measures\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J Collins, Alexis Speck Glennon, Patricia Logan-Greene, Mickey Sperlich, EunSook Seong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497315251329998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Social workers play a crucial role in assessing risks for harm to self and others, including firearm access. Given the growing concern of firearm violence, standardized assessment tools addressing firearm risks could improve social workers’ assessments. Method: This rapid review identifies and evaluates available clinical assessment tools that include items related to firearms. Result: After searching five electronic databases, 15 assessment measures were identified and categorized into five domains: aggressive and violent behaviors, delinquent behaviors, familial attitudes and beliefs, dating or partner violence, and suicide. Discussion: The review highlights the limitations of current tools and underscores the importance of standardized assessments in providing social workers with validated frameworks to inform clinical decision making, while also calling for the development of more comprehensive, culturally informed measures. The review concludes with recommendations and suggestions for incorporating antiracist practices and cultural humility into clinical practice to address firearm-related risks and enhance safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Social Work Practice\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Social Work Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251329998\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251329998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:社会工作者在评估伤害自己和他人的风险,包括获得枪支方面发挥着至关重要的作用。鉴于对枪支暴力的日益关注,针对枪支风险的标准化评估工具可以改善社会工作者的评估。方法:这种快速审查识别和评估现有的临床评估工具,包括与枪支有关的项目。结果:通过对5个电子数据库的检索,确定了15项评估措施,并将其分为5个领域:攻击和暴力行为、不良行为、家庭态度和信念、约会或伴侣暴力、自杀。讨论:该综述强调了当前工具的局限性,并强调了标准化评估在为社会工作者提供有效框架以指导临床决策方面的重要性,同时也呼吁开发更全面、更有文化背景的措施。该审查最后提出了将反种族主义做法和文化谦逊纳入临床实践的建议和建议,以解决与枪支有关的风险并提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing for Firearm Risks: A Rapid Review of Clinical Assessment Measures
Purpose: Social workers play a crucial role in assessing risks for harm to self and others, including firearm access. Given the growing concern of firearm violence, standardized assessment tools addressing firearm risks could improve social workers’ assessments. Method: This rapid review identifies and evaluates available clinical assessment tools that include items related to firearms. Result: After searching five electronic databases, 15 assessment measures were identified and categorized into five domains: aggressive and violent behaviors, delinquent behaviors, familial attitudes and beliefs, dating or partner violence, and suicide. Discussion: The review highlights the limitations of current tools and underscores the importance of standardized assessments in providing social workers with validated frameworks to inform clinical decision making, while also calling for the development of more comprehensive, culturally informed measures. The review concludes with recommendations and suggestions for incorporating antiracist practices and cultural humility into clinical practice to address firearm-related risks and enhance safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Research on Social Work Practice, sponsored by the Society for Social Work and Research, is a disciplinary journal devoted to the publication of empirical research concerning the methods and outcomes of social work practice. Social work practice is broadly interpreted to refer to the application of intentionally designed social work intervention programs to problems of societal and/or interpersonal importance, including behavior analysis or psychotherapy involving individuals; case management; practice involving couples, families, and small groups; community practice education; and the development, implementation, and evaluation of social policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信