谁留下,谁上场?纵向旅行调查中的参与者留存率和智能手机应用使用情况

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland
{"title":"谁留下,谁上场?纵向旅行调查中的参与者留存率和智能手机应用使用情况","authors":"Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who stays and who plays? Participant retention and smartphone app usage in a longitudinal travel survey\",\"authors\":\"Stephen P. Greaves, Alec Cobbold, Oliver Stanesby, Melanie J. Sharman, Kim Jose, Jack Evans, Verity Cleland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10608-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵向研究在调查行为变化方面越来越受欢迎,但在参与者招募、保留、参与调查任务、额外负担和最终数据质量方面存在额外挑战。个人技术,尤其是智能手机,已经成为应对这些挑战不可或缺的一部分,但在用户接受度和参与度方面也存在一些问题。本文在澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州一项旨在鼓励使用公共交通和增加相关体育活动的干预措施的纵向研究的背景下调查了这些问题。该研究在七个月的时间里收集了多波数据,其中使用智能手机应用程序收集旅行数据,并辅以用户体验调查。年龄较大的参与者、更多地使用应用程序的参与者、对调查的研究/环境/健康信息以及潜在的经济收益做出回应的参与者的流失率较低。年龄较大的参与者使用应用程序的比例较低,而男性的应用程序参与度更高,那些旅行较少的人,以及那些表示环境原因是完成研究的动机的人。人们对这款应用的体验好坏参半,参与者对它的易用性、享乐动机和回忆旅行的帮助表现出积极的态度;然而,人们对行程记录的准确性、校正行程的相关负担以及智能手机电池寿命的缩短提出了担忧。尽管与COVID-19限制的意外巧合,但结果为招聘、保留和纵向研究结果的事后分析提供了重要指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who stays and who plays? Participant retention and smartphone app usage in a longitudinal travel survey

Longitudinal studies have become increasingly popular for investigating changes in behaviour, but present additional challenges around participant recruitment, retention, engagement with survey tasks, additional burden and ultimately data quality. Personal technologies, particularly smartphones, have become integral to tackling these challenges but come with their own caveats around user acceptance and engagement. The current paper investigates these issues in the context of a longitudinal study of interventions designed to encourage use of public transport and increase associated physical activity in Tasmania, Australia. The study comprised multiple waves of data collection over a seven-month period in which travel data were collected using a smartphone app supplemented with user experience surveys. Attrition is lower for older participants, those engaging with the app more, and those responding to the research/environmental/health messaging of the survey as well as the potential for financial gain. App usage is lower among older participants while app engagement is stronger for males, those recording less travel and those indicating environmental reasons as a motivator for completing the study. Experiences with the app are mixed, participants report positive sentiments about the ease of use, hedonic motivation, and help in recalling travel; however, concerns are raised over the accuracy of trip recording, the associated burden of correcting trips, and reductions in smartphone battery-life. Despite the unplanned coincidence with the COVID-19 restrictions, outcomes provide important guidance around recruitment, retention and post-hoc analysis of results from longitudinal studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信