轮廓神经血管系统栓塞破裂与未破裂动脉瘤106例分析

Fritz Wodarg, Fernando Bueno Neves, Friederike Gärtner, Naomi Larsen, Sönke Peters, Johannes Hensler, Tristan Klintz, Justus Mahnke, Hajrullah Ahmeti, Alexander Doukas, Olav Jansen, Karim Mostafa
{"title":"轮廓神经血管系统栓塞破裂与未破裂动脉瘤106例分析","authors":"Fritz Wodarg, Fernando Bueno Neves, Friederike Gärtner, Naomi Larsen, Sönke Peters, Johannes Hensler, Tristan Klintz, Justus Mahnke, Hajrullah Ahmeti, Alexander Doukas, Olav Jansen, Karim Mostafa","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Aneurysmal disease of the intracranial vasculature poses a relevant threat, warranting effective interventions. Minimally invasive interventional techniques for aneurysm treatment have evolved to the application of flow-diversion stents and devices. This study focuses on the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS), aiming to add knowledge regarding its mid- to long-term outcomes in treating wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted in accordance with STROBE guidelines, this study retrospectively evaluated all patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with CNS embolization. Demographic and interventional data were collected retrospectively, including aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and angiographic follow-up evaluations up to 24 months after CNS implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 patients with 109 aneurysms were included in this study, whereby 72 patients were treated for an incidental aneurysm, while 34 patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Implantation was successful in 95.5% of patients. Occlusion rates were as follows: 6 months (69/106, 65.1%): Raymond-Roy-Scale (RRS) 1 44/69 (63.4%), RRS 2 16/69 (23.1%), RRS 3a 4/69 (5.8%), RRS 3b 5/69 (7.2%); 12 months (44/106, 41.5%): RRS 1 24/44 (55.5%), RRS 2 12/44 (27.3%), RRS 3a 4/44 (9.0%), RRS 3b 4/44 (9.0%); 24 months (30/106, 28.3%): RRS 1 21/30 (70.0%), RRS 2 8/30 (26.7%), RRS 3b 1/30 (3.3%). Periprocedural complications: Overall 8/106 (7.5%); elective cases 4/72 (5.5%); aneurysm rupture 4/34 (11.7%). Adjunctive devices were used in 13/106 cases (12.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present work reports the long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up results of a single-center cohort of 106 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the CNS. The CNS demonstrated a high rate of successful implantation and promising mid- and long-term stability, with a low reintervention rate beyond 24 months in patients exhibiting early occlusion at 6 months. While acknowledging the limitations, these findings contribute valuable information about the safety and efficacy of the CNS, and warrant continued exploration in larger, prospective studies to validate its role in aneurysm treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"698-705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embolization of Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysms with the Contour Neurovascular System-Summary of 106 Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Fritz Wodarg, Fernando Bueno Neves, Friederike Gärtner, Naomi Larsen, Sönke Peters, Johannes Hensler, Tristan Klintz, Justus Mahnke, Hajrullah Ahmeti, Alexander Doukas, Olav Jansen, Karim Mostafa\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Aneurysmal disease of the intracranial vasculature poses a relevant threat, warranting effective interventions. Minimally invasive interventional techniques for aneurysm treatment have evolved to the application of flow-diversion stents and devices. This study focuses on the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS), aiming to add knowledge regarding its mid- to long-term outcomes in treating wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted in accordance with STROBE guidelines, this study retrospectively evaluated all patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with CNS embolization. Demographic and interventional data were collected retrospectively, including aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and angiographic follow-up evaluations up to 24 months after CNS implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 patients with 109 aneurysms were included in this study, whereby 72 patients were treated for an incidental aneurysm, while 34 patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Implantation was successful in 95.5% of patients. Occlusion rates were as follows: 6 months (69/106, 65.1%): Raymond-Roy-Scale (RRS) 1 44/69 (63.4%), RRS 2 16/69 (23.1%), RRS 3a 4/69 (5.8%), RRS 3b 5/69 (7.2%); 12 months (44/106, 41.5%): RRS 1 24/44 (55.5%), RRS 2 12/44 (27.3%), RRS 3a 4/44 (9.0%), RRS 3b 4/44 (9.0%); 24 months (30/106, 28.3%): RRS 1 21/30 (70.0%), RRS 2 8/30 (26.7%), RRS 3b 1/30 (3.3%). Periprocedural complications: Overall 8/106 (7.5%); elective cases 4/72 (5.5%); aneurysm rupture 4/34 (11.7%). Adjunctive devices were used in 13/106 cases (12.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present work reports the long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up results of a single-center cohort of 106 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the CNS. The CNS demonstrated a high rate of successful implantation and promising mid- and long-term stability, with a low reintervention rate beyond 24 months in patients exhibiting early occlusion at 6 months. While acknowledging the limitations, these findings contribute valuable information about the safety and efficacy of the CNS, and warrant continued exploration in larger, prospective studies to validate its role in aneurysm treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"698-705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:颅内血管动脉瘤性疾病是一种相关的威胁,需要进行有效的干预。动脉瘤治疗的微创介入技术已经发展到应用分流支架和装置。本研究的重点是轮廓神经血管系统(CNS),旨在增加有关其治疗宽颈颅内动脉瘤的中长期结果的知识。材料和方法:本研究按照STROBE指南,回顾性评价所有经中枢神经系统栓塞治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者。回顾性收集人口统计学和介入资料,包括动脉瘤特征、手术细节和CNS植入后24个月的血管造影随访评估。结果:本研究共纳入106例109个动脉瘤,其中72例为偶发动脉瘤,34例为蛛网膜下腔出血。95.5%的患者植入成功。6个月(69/106,65.1%):raymond - roy量表(RRS) 144 /69 (63.4%), RRS 2 16/69 (23.1%), RRS 3a 4/69 (5.8%), RRS 3b 5/69 (7.2%);12个月(44/106,41.5%):RRS 1 24/44 (55.5%), RRS 2 12/44 (27.3%), RRS 3a 4/44 (9.0%), RRS 3b 4/44 (9.0%);24个月(30/106,28.3%):RRS 1 21/30 (70.0%), RRS 2 8/30 (26.7%), RRS 3b 1/30(3.3%)。围手术期并发症:总体8/106 (7.5%);选修病例4/72 (5.5%);动脉瘤破裂4/34(11.7%)。106例患者中有13例(12.2%)使用辅助器械。结论:本研究报告了106例接受中枢神经系统治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者的长期血管造影和临床随访结果。CNS植入成功率高,中长期稳定性好,6个月时出现早期闭塞的患者24个月后再干预率低。在承认局限性的同时,这些发现为中枢神经系统的安全性和有效性提供了有价值的信息,并值得在更大的前瞻性研究中继续探索,以验证其在动脉瘤治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Embolization of Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysms with the Contour Neurovascular System-Summary of 106 Cases.

Background and purpose: Aneurysmal disease of the intracranial vasculature poses a relevant threat, warranting effective interventions. Minimally invasive interventional techniques for aneurysm treatment have evolved to the application of flow-diversion stents and devices. This study focuses on the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS), aiming to add knowledge regarding its mid- to long-term outcomes in treating wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

Materials and methods: Conducted in accordance with STROBE guidelines, this study retrospectively evaluated all patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with CNS embolization. Demographic and interventional data were collected retrospectively, including aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and angiographic follow-up evaluations up to 24 months after CNS implantation.

Results: A total of 106 patients with 109 aneurysms were included in this study, whereby 72 patients were treated for an incidental aneurysm, while 34 patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Implantation was successful in 95.5% of patients. Occlusion rates were as follows: 6 months (69/106, 65.1%): Raymond-Roy-Scale (RRS) 1 44/69 (63.4%), RRS 2 16/69 (23.1%), RRS 3a 4/69 (5.8%), RRS 3b 5/69 (7.2%); 12 months (44/106, 41.5%): RRS 1 24/44 (55.5%), RRS 2 12/44 (27.3%), RRS 3a 4/44 (9.0%), RRS 3b 4/44 (9.0%); 24 months (30/106, 28.3%): RRS 1 21/30 (70.0%), RRS 2 8/30 (26.7%), RRS 3b 1/30 (3.3%). Periprocedural complications: Overall 8/106 (7.5%); elective cases 4/72 (5.5%); aneurysm rupture 4/34 (11.7%). Adjunctive devices were used in 13/106 cases (12.2%).

Conclusions: The present work reports the long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up results of a single-center cohort of 106 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the CNS. The CNS demonstrated a high rate of successful implantation and promising mid- and long-term stability, with a low reintervention rate beyond 24 months in patients exhibiting early occlusion at 6 months. While acknowledging the limitations, these findings contribute valuable information about the safety and efficacy of the CNS, and warrant continued exploration in larger, prospective studies to validate its role in aneurysm treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信