一项调查探索人们购买锂补充剂的经历:一项关于人们购买锂补充剂的经历的调查。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rebecca Strawbridge, Samuel Myrtle, Pietro Carmellini, Elliot Hampsey, David A Cousins, Allan H Young
{"title":"一项调查探索人们购买锂补充剂的经历:一项关于人们购买锂补充剂的经历的调查。","authors":"Rebecca Strawbridge, Samuel Myrtle, Pietro Carmellini, Elliot Hampsey, David A Cousins, Allan H Young","doi":"10.1177/07067437251328282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveLithium, despite its evidence base and range of indications, is often underutilized due to safety concerns associated with high-dose prescriptions and consequent necessity for regular blood monitoring. Emerging evidence suggests its potential benefits at lower doses, especially for its pro-cognitive effects and positive safety profile. While accessible as a supplement, empirical human evidence on neuropsychiatric effects is lacking. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding the utilization and perceived effects of low-dose lithium supplements (LiS) in the community.MethodsCross-sectional, opportunistic survey of 211 participants aged ≥18 years who disclosed taking over-the-counter lithium supplements. The survey assessed sample demographics, supplement details, overall perspectives, and personal experiences related to the use of LiS.ResultsThe most common form of LiS taken was aspartate at 10 mg once per day, although lithium orotate and ionic lithium were also frequently used. The most common beliefs regarding the benefits of using lithium as a supplement concern efficacy for anxiety, but the most common improvements experienced was in the domain of cognition, closely followed by anxiety and mood. Mood was most commonly reported as the greatest improvement. Side effects and withdrawal phenomena were more prevalent than anticipated.ConclusionThis study revealed a diverse range of lithium supplements taken, in terms of dosage, formulation, frequency, and duration of intake. Anecdotal evidence highlighted prevalent perceived benefits and adverse effects. The study is, however, limited notably by its cross-sectional opportunistic design; more robust evidence, especially from controlled trials, is needed to fully establish the specific benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.Plain Language Summary TitleA survey exploring people's experiences with lithium bought as a supplement.<b>Plain Language Summary</b>Lithium is the oldest effective medication used in psychiatry and holds an important place today. However, there are challenges with lithium in high doses and it may still be effective in low doses. Lower doses of lithium can be bought as a supplement over the counter, but this version of lithium has not been studied in research. We did a survey aiming to tell us some information about the experiences of people who have taken this supplementary lithium (\"LiS\"). From 211 adults who completed our study, results suggested that LiS is taken in many different forms, at different doses, frequencies and for different durations. People commonly believed and/or found that LiS was beneficial for anxiety, mood and cognition. Side effects and symptoms after stopping LiS were, however, more common than expected. Because this was just an initial survey, more in depth and rigorous research studies are needed to fully understand the exact benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437251328282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey Exploring People's Experiences With Lithium Bought as a Supplement: Une enquête sur l'expérience des personnes avec le lithium en supplément.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Strawbridge, Samuel Myrtle, Pietro Carmellini, Elliot Hampsey, David A Cousins, Allan H Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07067437251328282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveLithium, despite its evidence base and range of indications, is often underutilized due to safety concerns associated with high-dose prescriptions and consequent necessity for regular blood monitoring. Emerging evidence suggests its potential benefits at lower doses, especially for its pro-cognitive effects and positive safety profile. While accessible as a supplement, empirical human evidence on neuropsychiatric effects is lacking. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding the utilization and perceived effects of low-dose lithium supplements (LiS) in the community.MethodsCross-sectional, opportunistic survey of 211 participants aged ≥18 years who disclosed taking over-the-counter lithium supplements. The survey assessed sample demographics, supplement details, overall perspectives, and personal experiences related to the use of LiS.ResultsThe most common form of LiS taken was aspartate at 10 mg once per day, although lithium orotate and ionic lithium were also frequently used. The most common beliefs regarding the benefits of using lithium as a supplement concern efficacy for anxiety, but the most common improvements experienced was in the domain of cognition, closely followed by anxiety and mood. Mood was most commonly reported as the greatest improvement. Side effects and withdrawal phenomena were more prevalent than anticipated.ConclusionThis study revealed a diverse range of lithium supplements taken, in terms of dosage, formulation, frequency, and duration of intake. Anecdotal evidence highlighted prevalent perceived benefits and adverse effects. The study is, however, limited notably by its cross-sectional opportunistic design; more robust evidence, especially from controlled trials, is needed to fully establish the specific benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.Plain Language Summary TitleA survey exploring people's experiences with lithium bought as a supplement.<b>Plain Language Summary</b>Lithium is the oldest effective medication used in psychiatry and holds an important place today. However, there are challenges with lithium in high doses and it may still be effective in low doses. Lower doses of lithium can be bought as a supplement over the counter, but this version of lithium has not been studied in research. We did a survey aiming to tell us some information about the experiences of people who have taken this supplementary lithium (\\\"LiS\\\"). From 211 adults who completed our study, results suggested that LiS is taken in many different forms, at different doses, frequencies and for different durations. People commonly believed and/or found that LiS was beneficial for anxiety, mood and cognition. Side effects and symptoms after stopping LiS were, however, more common than expected. Because this was just an initial survey, more in depth and rigorous research studies are needed to fully understand the exact benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7067437251328282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251328282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251328282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有证据基础和适应症范围,但由于与大剂量处方相关的安全性问题以及随之而来的定期血液监测的必要性,锂常常未得到充分利用。新出现的证据表明,低剂量的潜在益处,特别是其促进认知的作用和积极的安全性。虽然可以作为一种补充,但缺乏关于神经精神影响的人类经验证据。本研究旨在为低剂量锂补充剂(LiS)在社区的使用和感知效果提供初步证据。方法对211名年龄≥18岁、公开服用非处方锂补充剂的参与者进行横断面、机会性调查。该调查评估了样本人口统计、补充细节、总体观点以及与使用人工智能相关的个人经历。结果li的最常见形式是天冬氨酸,每日一次,剂量为10mg,但也经常使用旋酸锂和离子锂。关于使用锂作为补充剂的好处,最常见的看法是对焦虑的疗效,但最常见的改善是在认知领域,紧随其后的是焦虑和情绪。最常见的改善是情绪。副作用和戒断现象比预期的更为普遍。结论:本研究揭示了锂补充剂在剂量、配方、频率和摄入时间方面的多样性。坊间证据强调了普遍存在的益处和不利影响。然而,该研究明显受到其横断面机会主义设计的限制;需要更有力的证据,特别是来自对照试验的证据,来充分确定不同形式和剂量的可获得锂补充剂的具体利弊。标题:一项调查,探讨人们购买锂作为补充剂的经验。锂是用于精神病学的最古老的有效药物,至今仍占有重要地位。然而,高剂量的锂存在挑战,低剂量的锂可能仍然有效。低剂量的锂可以在柜台上购买作为补充剂,但这种形式的锂还没有在研究中研究过。我们做了一项调查,旨在告诉我们一些关于服用这种补充锂(“li”)的人的经历。从211名完成我们研究的成年人中,结果表明li以许多不同的形式、不同的剂量、频率和不同的持续时间被服用。人们普遍认为和/或发现它对焦虑、情绪和认知有益。然而,停药后的副作用和症状比预期的更普遍。因为这只是一个初步的调查,需要更深入和严格的研究来充分了解不同形式和剂量的锂补充剂的确切利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey Exploring People's Experiences With Lithium Bought as a Supplement: Une enquête sur l'expérience des personnes avec le lithium en supplément.

ObjectiveLithium, despite its evidence base and range of indications, is often underutilized due to safety concerns associated with high-dose prescriptions and consequent necessity for regular blood monitoring. Emerging evidence suggests its potential benefits at lower doses, especially for its pro-cognitive effects and positive safety profile. While accessible as a supplement, empirical human evidence on neuropsychiatric effects is lacking. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence regarding the utilization and perceived effects of low-dose lithium supplements (LiS) in the community.MethodsCross-sectional, opportunistic survey of 211 participants aged ≥18 years who disclosed taking over-the-counter lithium supplements. The survey assessed sample demographics, supplement details, overall perspectives, and personal experiences related to the use of LiS.ResultsThe most common form of LiS taken was aspartate at 10 mg once per day, although lithium orotate and ionic lithium were also frequently used. The most common beliefs regarding the benefits of using lithium as a supplement concern efficacy for anxiety, but the most common improvements experienced was in the domain of cognition, closely followed by anxiety and mood. Mood was most commonly reported as the greatest improvement. Side effects and withdrawal phenomena were more prevalent than anticipated.ConclusionThis study revealed a diverse range of lithium supplements taken, in terms of dosage, formulation, frequency, and duration of intake. Anecdotal evidence highlighted prevalent perceived benefits and adverse effects. The study is, however, limited notably by its cross-sectional opportunistic design; more robust evidence, especially from controlled trials, is needed to fully establish the specific benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.Plain Language Summary TitleA survey exploring people's experiences with lithium bought as a supplement.Plain Language SummaryLithium is the oldest effective medication used in psychiatry and holds an important place today. However, there are challenges with lithium in high doses and it may still be effective in low doses. Lower doses of lithium can be bought as a supplement over the counter, but this version of lithium has not been studied in research. We did a survey aiming to tell us some information about the experiences of people who have taken this supplementary lithium ("LiS"). From 211 adults who completed our study, results suggested that LiS is taken in many different forms, at different doses, frequencies and for different durations. People commonly believed and/or found that LiS was beneficial for anxiety, mood and cognition. Side effects and symptoms after stopping LiS were, however, more common than expected. Because this was just an initial survey, more in depth and rigorous research studies are needed to fully understand the exact benefits and drawbacks associated with different forms and doses of accessible lithium supplements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信