药物包被球囊治疗老年冠状动脉疾病的临床影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Eun-Seok Shin, Mi Hee Jang, Sunwon Kim, Dong Oh Kang, Ki-Bum Won, Bitna Kim, Ae-Young Her
{"title":"药物包被球囊治疗老年冠状动脉疾病的临床影响。","authors":"Eun-Seok Shin, Mi Hee Jang, Sunwon Kim, Dong Oh Kang, Ki-Bum Won, Bitna Kim, Ae-Young Her","doi":"10.26599/1671-5411.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in elderly patients are limited. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of DCB treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 232 patients aged 75 years or older with coronary artery disease who underwent successful PCI using either DCB alone or in combination with drug-eluting stent (DES) based on pre-dilation results (DCB-based PCI). These patients were compared with 1818 elderly patients who underwent second-generation DES implantation (DES-only PCI). The endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the DCB-based PCI, 61.2% of patients received DCB-only treatment. Compared to DES-only PCI, the DCB-based PCI group had fewer stents (0.5 ± 0.7 and 1.7 ± 0.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001), shorter stent lengths (13.3 ± 20.9 mm and 37.4 ± 23.0 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and lower usage of small stents with a diameter of 2.5 mm or less (15.6% and 28.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.010). The DCB-based PCI group exhibited lower rate of MACE (5.5% and 13.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (1.1% and 5.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.017) and major bleeding (0.7% and 5.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.009) at 2-year follow-up. The reduced risk in 2-year MACE was consistently observed across various matching procedures, with the most significant reduction noted in target vessel revascularization and major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DCB-based PCI reduced stent burden, particularly in the usage of small diameter stents, and was associated with lower risks of MACE, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding compared to DES-only PCI in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","volume":"22 1","pages":"150-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of drug-coated balloon treatment of coronary artery disease in elderly patients.\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Seok Shin, Mi Hee Jang, Sunwon Kim, Dong Oh Kang, Ki-Bum Won, Bitna Kim, Ae-Young Her\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/1671-5411.2025.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in elderly patients are limited. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of DCB treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 232 patients aged 75 years or older with coronary artery disease who underwent successful PCI using either DCB alone or in combination with drug-eluting stent (DES) based on pre-dilation results (DCB-based PCI). These patients were compared with 1818 elderly patients who underwent second-generation DES implantation (DES-only PCI). The endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the DCB-based PCI, 61.2% of patients received DCB-only treatment. Compared to DES-only PCI, the DCB-based PCI group had fewer stents (0.5 ± 0.7 and 1.7 ± 0.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001), shorter stent lengths (13.3 ± 20.9 mm and 37.4 ± 23.0 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and lower usage of small stents with a diameter of 2.5 mm or less (15.6% and 28.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.010). The DCB-based PCI group exhibited lower rate of MACE (5.5% and 13.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (1.1% and 5.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.017) and major bleeding (0.7% and 5.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.009) at 2-year follow-up. The reduced risk in 2-year MACE was consistently observed across various matching procedures, with the most significant reduction noted in target vessel revascularization and major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DCB-based PCI reduced stent burden, particularly in the usage of small diameter stents, and was associated with lower risks of MACE, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding compared to DES-only PCI in elderly patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"150-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.01.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗老年患者的数据有限。本研究旨在评价DCB治疗老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析232例75岁及以上冠心病患者,根据预扩张结果(基于DCB的PCI),分别使用DCB单独或联合药物洗脱支架(DES)成功行PCI。这些患者与1818例接受第二代DES植入(DES-only PCI)的老年患者进行比较。终点是2年随访时的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。结果:在基于dcb的PCI中,61.2%的患者只接受了dcb治疗。与仅des组相比,基于dcb的PCI组支架数量较少(0.5±0.7和1.7±0.8,P < 0.001),支架长度较短(13.3±20.9 mm和37.4±23.0 mm, P < 0.001),直径小于2.5 mm的小支架使用率较低(15.6%和28.7%,P = 0.010)。在2年随访中,基于dcb的PCI组MACE发生率(5.5%和13.1%,P = 0.003)、靶血管重建术发生率(1.1%和5.6%,P = 0.017)和大出血发生率(0.7%和5.1%,P = 0.009)较低。2年MACE的风险降低在各种匹配手术中都得到了一致的观察,靶血管重建术和大出血的风险降低最为显著。结论:基于dcb的PCI减轻了支架负担,特别是小直径支架的使用,并且与仅des的老年患者相比,MACE、靶血管重建术和大出血的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical impact of drug-coated balloon treatment of coronary artery disease in elderly patients.

Background: Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in elderly patients are limited. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of DCB treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among elderly patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis included 232 patients aged 75 years or older with coronary artery disease who underwent successful PCI using either DCB alone or in combination with drug-eluting stent (DES) based on pre-dilation results (DCB-based PCI). These patients were compared with 1818 elderly patients who underwent second-generation DES implantation (DES-only PCI). The endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 2-year follow-up.

Results: In the DCB-based PCI, 61.2% of patients received DCB-only treatment. Compared to DES-only PCI, the DCB-based PCI group had fewer stents (0.5 ± 0.7 and 1.7 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), shorter stent lengths (13.3 ± 20.9 mm and 37.4 ± 23.0 mm, P < 0.001), and lower usage of small stents with a diameter of 2.5 mm or less (15.6% and 28.7%, P = 0.010). The DCB-based PCI group exhibited lower rate of MACE (5.5% and 13.1%, P = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (1.1% and 5.6%, P = 0.017) and major bleeding (0.7% and 5.1%, P = 0.009) at 2-year follow-up. The reduced risk in 2-year MACE was consistently observed across various matching procedures, with the most significant reduction noted in target vessel revascularization and major bleeding.

Conclusion: The DCB-based PCI reduced stent burden, particularly in the usage of small diameter stents, and was associated with lower risks of MACE, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding compared to DES-only PCI in elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1161
期刊介绍: JGC focuses on both basic research and clinical practice to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease in the aged people, especially those with concomitant disease of other major organ-systems, such as the lungs, the kidneys, liver, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract or endocrinology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信