坚持患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好:一项2年随访研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mette A Smith, Anne C Brøchner, Helene K Nedergaard, Hanne I Jensen
{"title":"坚持患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好:一项2年随访研究。","authors":"Mette A Smith, Anne C Brøchner, Helene K Nedergaard, Hanne I Jensen","doi":"10.1177/08258597251329842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThere is increasing interest in advance care planning (ACP) and the implementation of various forms of ACP. The purpose of ACP is to define patients' goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care for patients nearing the end of life (EOL). The aim of this study was to investigate adherence to patients' preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment in emergency situations, as documented in a Danish POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form.MethodsA retrospective journal review was conducted 2 years after the conversation with the patients about their wishes for treatment and care at EOL. Medical records included electronic hospital records, nursing home records, and general practice records. Patients were assessed nearing EOL and included in the study based on a negative response to the \"surprise.\"ResultsA total of 120 patients and nursing home residents were included in the study. Overall, there were 2148 contacts with the healthcare system, of which 31 were emergency situations, where the patients were not capable of expressing their own wishes. In 4 contacts (12%), the patients (4) received treatment discordant with their wishes, as documented in the POLST form (and medical record).ConclusionsOur study shows that patients assessed nearing EOL are a patient group with many contacts with the healthcare system, and the results indicate that having had an ACP conversation and the wishes documented is useful to avoid unwanted treatment in emergency situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"8258597251329842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to Patients' Preferences for Levels of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mette A Smith, Anne C Brøchner, Helene K Nedergaard, Hanne I Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08258597251329842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThere is increasing interest in advance care planning (ACP) and the implementation of various forms of ACP. The purpose of ACP is to define patients' goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care for patients nearing the end of life (EOL). The aim of this study was to investigate adherence to patients' preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment in emergency situations, as documented in a Danish POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form.MethodsA retrospective journal review was conducted 2 years after the conversation with the patients about their wishes for treatment and care at EOL. Medical records included electronic hospital records, nursing home records, and general practice records. Patients were assessed nearing EOL and included in the study based on a negative response to the \\\"surprise.\\\"ResultsA total of 120 patients and nursing home residents were included in the study. Overall, there were 2148 contacts with the healthcare system, of which 31 were emergency situations, where the patients were not capable of expressing their own wishes. In 4 contacts (12%), the patients (4) received treatment discordant with their wishes, as documented in the POLST form (and medical record).ConclusionsOur study shows that patients assessed nearing EOL are a patient group with many contacts with the healthcare system, and the results indicate that having had an ACP conversation and the wishes documented is useful to avoid unwanted treatment in emergency situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8258597251329842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597251329842\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597251329842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人们对预先护理计划(ACP)和各种形式的ACP的实施越来越感兴趣。ACP的目的是确定患者对接近生命终结(EOL)的患者未来医疗和护理的目标和偏好。这项研究的目的是调查患者在紧急情况下对维持生命治疗水平的偏好的依从性,这些偏好记录在丹麦的POLST(维持生命治疗的医生命令)表格中。方法回顾性回顾与患者在EOL的治疗和护理意愿对话后2年的日志。医疗记录包括电子医院记录、疗养院记录和一般医疗记录。对接近EOL的患者进行评估,并根据对“惊喜”的负面反应纳入研究。结果共有120名患者和养老院居民参与了研究。总体而言,与卫生保健系统有2148次接触,其中31次是紧急情况,患者无法表达自己的意愿。在4次接触中(12%),患者(4名)接受了与他们的意愿不一致的治疗,这些治疗记录在POLST表格(和医疗记录)中。结论我们的研究表明,评估的接近EOL的患者是一个与医疗保健系统接触较多的患者群体,结果表明,进行ACP对话并记录愿望有助于避免紧急情况下不必要的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence to Patients' Preferences for Levels of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.

ObjectiveThere is increasing interest in advance care planning (ACP) and the implementation of various forms of ACP. The purpose of ACP is to define patients' goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care for patients nearing the end of life (EOL). The aim of this study was to investigate adherence to patients' preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment in emergency situations, as documented in a Danish POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form.MethodsA retrospective journal review was conducted 2 years after the conversation with the patients about their wishes for treatment and care at EOL. Medical records included electronic hospital records, nursing home records, and general practice records. Patients were assessed nearing EOL and included in the study based on a negative response to the "surprise."ResultsA total of 120 patients and nursing home residents were included in the study. Overall, there were 2148 contacts with the healthcare system, of which 31 were emergency situations, where the patients were not capable of expressing their own wishes. In 4 contacts (12%), the patients (4) received treatment discordant with their wishes, as documented in the POLST form (and medical record).ConclusionsOur study shows that patients assessed nearing EOL are a patient group with many contacts with the healthcare system, and the results indicate that having had an ACP conversation and the wishes documented is useful to avoid unwanted treatment in emergency situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信