Jacquelyn D Marsh, Bryn Zomar, Anthony Tannous, James Howard, Steven MacDonald, Brent Lanting
{"title":"Cost Analysis of Direct Anterior versus Direct Lateral Approach for Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Impact Cost?","authors":"Jacquelyn D Marsh, Bryn Zomar, Anthony Tannous, James Howard, Steven MacDonald, Brent Lanting","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective surgery for advanced osteoarthritis. The rising demand for THA and increasing wait times are having a substantial impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased pressure to move to outpatient care. This has most commonly been enabled through a minimally invasive, direct anterior (DA) surgical approach; however, recently, the direct lateral (DL) approach has also been used in outpatient THA. The purpose of this study was to compare costs between outpatient THA using a DA compared to a DL approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and a prospective cohort study. Participants undergoing primary THA using the DA approach were randomly assigned to be discharged on the same day as surgery (outpatient) or on day one post-surgery (inpatient). The cohort study included patients undergoing outpatient THA using the DL approach. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the randomized trial to the prospective cohort of outpatient DL THAs. We recorded all costs associated with each surgical approach. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary regarding any resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, medications, informal care, productivity losses, and out-of-pocket expenditures up to three months postoperative. There were 127 patients in the DA group and 51 patients in the DL group. The mean age of patients in the DA group was 66 years compared to 59 years in the DL group (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from either the healthcare payer (DA = 7,910.19, DL = 7,847.17, P = 0.80) or societal perspectives (DA = 14,657.21, DL = 14,581.21, P = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest similar overall mean costs over 90 days postoperative between outpatient THA using a DL or DA surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)是治疗晚期骨关节炎的有效手术。对全髋关节置换术的需求不断增加,等待时间越来越长,对医疗资源产生了重大影响,导致转向门诊治疗的压力增大。最常见的方法是采用微创的直接前路(DA)手术方法;但最近,直接侧路(DL)方法也被用于门诊 THA。本研究的目的是比较门诊 THA 采用 DA 方式和 DL 方式的成本:本研究是对一项随机对照试验和一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。使用DA方法进行初级THA手术的参与者被随机分配到手术当天出院(门诊)或手术后第一天出院(住院)。队列研究包括使用DL方法接受门诊THA的患者。我们将随机试验门诊组患者与前瞻性 DL THA 门诊组患者进行了比较。我们记录了每种手术方法的所有相关费用。出院后,参与者还填写了一份自我报告的费用日记,内容涉及急诊就诊或后续住院、检查和手术、会诊或随访、医疗保健专业服务、康复、药物、非正式护理、生产力损失以及术后三个月内的自费支出等任何资源使用情况。DA组有127名患者,DL组有51名患者。DA组患者的平均年龄为66岁,而DL组患者的平均年龄为59岁(P < 0.01):从医疗支付方(DA = 7,910.19, DL = 7,847.17, P = 0.80)或社会角度(DA = 14,657.21, DL = 14,581.21, P = 0.96)来看,组间成本差异均无统计学意义:我们的研究结果表明,采用DL或DA手术方式的门诊THA患者术后90天的总平均费用相似。
Cost Analysis of Direct Anterior versus Direct Lateral Approach for Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Impact Cost?
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective surgery for advanced osteoarthritis. The rising demand for THA and increasing wait times are having a substantial impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased pressure to move to outpatient care. This has most commonly been enabled through a minimally invasive, direct anterior (DA) surgical approach; however, recently, the direct lateral (DL) approach has also been used in outpatient THA. The purpose of this study was to compare costs between outpatient THA using a DA compared to a DL approach.
Methods: The present study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and a prospective cohort study. Participants undergoing primary THA using the DA approach were randomly assigned to be discharged on the same day as surgery (outpatient) or on day one post-surgery (inpatient). The cohort study included patients undergoing outpatient THA using the DL approach. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the randomized trial to the prospective cohort of outpatient DL THAs. We recorded all costs associated with each surgical approach. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary regarding any resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, medications, informal care, productivity losses, and out-of-pocket expenditures up to three months postoperative. There were 127 patients in the DA group and 51 patients in the DL group. The mean age of patients in the DA group was 66 years compared to 59 years in the DL group (P < 0.01).
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from either the healthcare payer (DA = 7,910.19, DL = 7,847.17, P = 0.80) or societal perspectives (DA = 14,657.21, DL = 14,581.21, P = 0.96).
Conclusion: Our results suggest similar overall mean costs over 90 days postoperative between outpatient THA using a DL or DA surgical approach.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.