IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carmen L Masson, Kelly R Knight, Emily A Levine, Joseph A Spillane, Ya Chi Angelina Liang, Leslie W Suen, Maggie M Chen, Barry Zevin, Robert P Schwartz, Phillip O Coffin, James L Sorensen
{"title":"Barriers to Buprenorphine Treatment Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Qualitative Study from the Provider Perspective.","authors":"Carmen L Masson, Kelly R Knight, Emily A Levine, Joseph A Spillane, Ya Chi Angelina Liang, Leslie W Suen, Maggie M Chen, Barry Zevin, Robert P Schwartz, Phillip O Coffin, James L Sorensen","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00967-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face a high risk of opioid-related deaths, yet there is limited qualitative data on the barriers encountered when accessing buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). To address this gap, we interviewed 28 clinicians, outreach workers, and administrators from organizations serving PEH with OUD. Our goal was to understand the barriers and facilitators at the patient, clinic, and institutional levels and gather recommendations for improvement. Interviews, conducted via Zoom and analyzed through thematic analysis, revealed several barriers. At the patient level, themes related to barriers included knowledge and experience (e.g., limited knowledge about buprenorphine options; rejection of buprenorphine due to prior experience with precipitated withdrawal); concerns about the medication and its administration (e.g., distrust of injectable medications; concerns about treatment control, and a prolonged informed consent process for extended-release injectable buprenorphine); and challenges due to homelessness (e.g., identification requirement to access medication at pharmacies, difficulties managing buprenorphine while unsheltered). At the clinic level, themes centered around staffing (e.g., lack of training and experience in treating PEH and staffing shortages) and health care-related stigma (e.g., discriminatory attitudes toward PEH with OUD). Institutional-level themes included state-regulatory factors (e.g., practice regulations limiting clinical pharmacists' ability to prescribe buprenorphine) and access factors (e.g., stigmatization of buprenorphine prescribing, limited low-barrier buprenorphine access, and care system complexity). Recommendations included educational programs for patients and clinicians to increase understanding and reduce stigma, integrating buprenorphine treatment into non-traditional settings, and providing housing with treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00967-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无家可归者(PEH)面临阿片类药物相关死亡的高风险,但有关他们在接受丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)时遇到的障碍的定性数据却很有限。为了填补这一空白,我们采访了 28 名临床医生、外联工作者以及为患有 OUD 的 PEH 提供服务的机构的管理人员。我们的目标是了解患者、诊所和机构层面的障碍和促进因素,并收集改进建议。我们通过 Zoom 进行了访谈,并通过主题分析法对访谈内容进行了分析,发现了一些障碍。对注射药物的不信任;对治疗控制的担忧,以及对缓释注射用丁丙诺啡的知情同意过程过长);以及无家可归带来的挑战(例如,在药房取药需要身份证明,在无住所的情况下管理丁丙诺啡有困难)。在诊所层面,主题集中在人员配备(如缺乏治疗 PEH 的培训和经验以及人员短缺)和与医疗相关的耻辱感(如对患有 OUD 的 PEH 的歧视态度)。机构层面的主题包括国家监管因素(例如,限制临床药剂师开具丁丙诺啡处方的执业条例)和获取因素(例如,开具丁丙诺啡处方的污名化、有限的低门槛丁丙诺啡获取途径以及护理系统的复杂性)。建议包括针对患者和临床医生的教育计划,以增加理解和减少污名化,将丁丙诺啡治疗纳入非传统环境,以及在治疗的同时提供住房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to Buprenorphine Treatment Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Qualitative Study from the Provider Perspective.

People experiencing homelessness (PEH) face a high risk of opioid-related deaths, yet there is limited qualitative data on the barriers encountered when accessing buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). To address this gap, we interviewed 28 clinicians, outreach workers, and administrators from organizations serving PEH with OUD. Our goal was to understand the barriers and facilitators at the patient, clinic, and institutional levels and gather recommendations for improvement. Interviews, conducted via Zoom and analyzed through thematic analysis, revealed several barriers. At the patient level, themes related to barriers included knowledge and experience (e.g., limited knowledge about buprenorphine options; rejection of buprenorphine due to prior experience with precipitated withdrawal); concerns about the medication and its administration (e.g., distrust of injectable medications; concerns about treatment control, and a prolonged informed consent process for extended-release injectable buprenorphine); and challenges due to homelessness (e.g., identification requirement to access medication at pharmacies, difficulties managing buprenorphine while unsheltered). At the clinic level, themes centered around staffing (e.g., lack of training and experience in treating PEH and staffing shortages) and health care-related stigma (e.g., discriminatory attitudes toward PEH with OUD). Institutional-level themes included state-regulatory factors (e.g., practice regulations limiting clinical pharmacists' ability to prescribe buprenorphine) and access factors (e.g., stigmatization of buprenorphine prescribing, limited low-barrier buprenorphine access, and care system complexity). Recommendations included educational programs for patients and clinicians to increase understanding and reduce stigma, integrating buprenorphine treatment into non-traditional settings, and providing housing with treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信