杜比鲁单抗每月减量保持对 CRSwNP 的疗效:一项为期两年的真实世界研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1002/lary.32162
Eugenio De Corso, Claudio Montuori, Gabriele De Maio, Leandro Maria D'Auria, Alberta Rizzuti, Maria Clara Pacilli, Giuseppe D'Agostino, Rodolfo Mastrapasqua, Dario Antonio Mele, Jacopo Galli
{"title":"杜比鲁单抗每月减量保持对 CRSwNP 的疗效:一项为期两年的真实世界研究。","authors":"Eugenio De Corso, Claudio Montuori, Gabriele De Maio, Leandro Maria D'Auria, Alberta Rizzuti, Maria Clara Pacilli, Giuseppe D'Agostino, Rodolfo Mastrapasqua, Dario Antonio Mele, Jacopo Galli","doi":"10.1002/lary.32162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate if dupilumab interval dose de-escalation to every 4 weeks negatively impacts treatment outcomes in real-life practice for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) during the first 2 years of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 148 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up. We compared two homogenous groups in terms of severity: group A included 77 patients who never modified the interval of administration during follow-up; group B included 71 patients who extended the dosing interval to monthly administration. We compared the treatment outcomes and differences in safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly interval dose prolongation was started in 22/71 patients (30.99%) at 6 months, in 11/71 (15.48%) at 9 months, in 22/71 (30.99%) at 12 months, and in 16/71 (22.54%) at 18 months. The dose prolongation was to manage minor adverse events in 9 of 71 patients; persistent eosinophilia in 26/71 patients; specific request of patients who had confirmed sustained control as determined by the physician's assessment in 36/71 cases. Mean values of all outcomes of response to treatment (i.e., volume of polyps, nasal obstruction, quality of life, olfaction) significantly improved at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline (p < 0.01) in both groups A and B. No significant differences were found comparing groups A and B for any of the outcomes examined over the 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that extending to monthly dosing of dupilumab in real life does not negatively impact outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dupilumab Monthly Dose De-Escalation Maintains Efficacy in CRSwNP: A Two-Year Real-World Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio De Corso, Claudio Montuori, Gabriele De Maio, Leandro Maria D'Auria, Alberta Rizzuti, Maria Clara Pacilli, Giuseppe D'Agostino, Rodolfo Mastrapasqua, Dario Antonio Mele, Jacopo Galli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate if dupilumab interval dose de-escalation to every 4 weeks negatively impacts treatment outcomes in real-life practice for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) during the first 2 years of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 148 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up. We compared two homogenous groups in terms of severity: group A included 77 patients who never modified the interval of administration during follow-up; group B included 71 patients who extended the dosing interval to monthly administration. We compared the treatment outcomes and differences in safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly interval dose prolongation was started in 22/71 patients (30.99%) at 6 months, in 11/71 (15.48%) at 9 months, in 22/71 (30.99%) at 12 months, and in 16/71 (22.54%) at 18 months. The dose prolongation was to manage minor adverse events in 9 of 71 patients; persistent eosinophilia in 26/71 patients; specific request of patients who had confirmed sustained control as determined by the physician's assessment in 36/71 cases. Mean values of all outcomes of response to treatment (i.e., volume of polyps, nasal obstruction, quality of life, olfaction) significantly improved at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline (p < 0.01) in both groups A and B. No significant differences were found comparing groups A and B for any of the outcomes examined over the 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that extending to monthly dosing of dupilumab in real life does not negatively impact outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估dupilumab间隔剂量降至每4周一次是否对现实生活中治疗前2年严重不受控制的慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的治疗结果产生负面影响。方法:我们招募了148名完成了2年随访的患者。我们在严重程度方面比较了两个同质组:A组包括77例在随访期间从未改变给药间隔的患者;B组71例患者延长给药间隔至每月给药。我们比较了治疗结果和安全性的差异。结果:22/71例患者(30.99%)在6个月时开始每月间隔剂量延长,11/71例(15.48%)在9个月时开始,22/71例(30.99%)在12个月时开始,16/71例(22.54%)在18个月时开始。71例患者中有9例延长剂量是为了控制轻微不良事件;26/71例持续性嗜酸性粒细胞增多;36/71例经医生评估确认持续控制的患者的特殊要求。与基线相比,治疗应答的所有结果(即息肉体积、鼻塞、生活质量、嗅觉)的均值在6、12和24个月时显著改善(p结论:这些结果表明,在现实生活中延长至每月给药dupilumab对严重不受控制的CRSwNP患者的结局没有负面影响。证据等级:3;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dupilumab Monthly Dose De-Escalation Maintains Efficacy in CRSwNP: A Two-Year Real-World Study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate if dupilumab interval dose de-escalation to every 4 weeks negatively impacts treatment outcomes in real-life practice for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) during the first 2 years of treatment.

Methods: We enrolled 148 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up. We compared two homogenous groups in terms of severity: group A included 77 patients who never modified the interval of administration during follow-up; group B included 71 patients who extended the dosing interval to monthly administration. We compared the treatment outcomes and differences in safety.

Results: The monthly interval dose prolongation was started in 22/71 patients (30.99%) at 6 months, in 11/71 (15.48%) at 9 months, in 22/71 (30.99%) at 12 months, and in 16/71 (22.54%) at 18 months. The dose prolongation was to manage minor adverse events in 9 of 71 patients; persistent eosinophilia in 26/71 patients; specific request of patients who had confirmed sustained control as determined by the physician's assessment in 36/71 cases. Mean values of all outcomes of response to treatment (i.e., volume of polyps, nasal obstruction, quality of life, olfaction) significantly improved at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline (p < 0.01) in both groups A and B. No significant differences were found comparing groups A and B for any of the outcomes examined over the 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: These results suggest that extending to monthly dosing of dupilumab in real life does not negatively impact outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.

Level of evidence: 3:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信