Eugenio De Corso, Claudio Montuori, Gabriele De Maio, Leandro Maria D'Auria, Alberta Rizzuti, Maria Clara Pacilli, Giuseppe D'Agostino, Rodolfo Mastrapasqua, Dario Antonio Mele, Jacopo Galli
{"title":"杜比鲁单抗每月减量保持对 CRSwNP 的疗效:一项为期两年的真实世界研究。","authors":"Eugenio De Corso, Claudio Montuori, Gabriele De Maio, Leandro Maria D'Auria, Alberta Rizzuti, Maria Clara Pacilli, Giuseppe D'Agostino, Rodolfo Mastrapasqua, Dario Antonio Mele, Jacopo Galli","doi":"10.1002/lary.32162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate if dupilumab interval dose de-escalation to every 4 weeks negatively impacts treatment outcomes in real-life practice for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) during the first 2 years of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 148 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up. We compared two homogenous groups in terms of severity: group A included 77 patients who never modified the interval of administration during follow-up; group B included 71 patients who extended the dosing interval to monthly administration. We compared the treatment outcomes and differences in safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly interval dose prolongation was started in 22/71 patients (30.99%) at 6 months, in 11/71 (15.48%) at 9 months, in 22/71 (30.99%) at 12 months, and in 16/71 (22.54%) at 18 months. The dose prolongation was to manage minor adverse events in 9 of 71 patients; persistent eosinophilia in 26/71 patients; specific request of patients who had confirmed sustained control as determined by the physician's assessment in 36/71 cases. Mean values of all outcomes of response to treatment (i.e., volume of polyps, nasal obstruction, quality of life, olfaction) significantly improved at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline (p < 0.01) in both groups A and B. No significant differences were found comparing groups A and B for any of the outcomes examined over the 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that extending to monthly dosing of dupilumab in real life does not negatively impact outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dupilumab Monthly Dose De-Escalation Maintains Efficacy in CRSwNP: A Two-Year Real-World Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio De Corso, Claudio Montuori, Gabriele De Maio, Leandro Maria D'Auria, Alberta Rizzuti, Maria Clara Pacilli, Giuseppe D'Agostino, Rodolfo Mastrapasqua, Dario Antonio Mele, Jacopo Galli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate if dupilumab interval dose de-escalation to every 4 weeks negatively impacts treatment outcomes in real-life practice for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) during the first 2 years of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 148 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up. We compared two homogenous groups in terms of severity: group A included 77 patients who never modified the interval of administration during follow-up; group B included 71 patients who extended the dosing interval to monthly administration. We compared the treatment outcomes and differences in safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly interval dose prolongation was started in 22/71 patients (30.99%) at 6 months, in 11/71 (15.48%) at 9 months, in 22/71 (30.99%) at 12 months, and in 16/71 (22.54%) at 18 months. The dose prolongation was to manage minor adverse events in 9 of 71 patients; persistent eosinophilia in 26/71 patients; specific request of patients who had confirmed sustained control as determined by the physician's assessment in 36/71 cases. Mean values of all outcomes of response to treatment (i.e., volume of polyps, nasal obstruction, quality of life, olfaction) significantly improved at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline (p < 0.01) in both groups A and B. No significant differences were found comparing groups A and B for any of the outcomes examined over the 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that extending to monthly dosing of dupilumab in real life does not negatively impact outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dupilumab Monthly Dose De-Escalation Maintains Efficacy in CRSwNP: A Two-Year Real-World Study.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate if dupilumab interval dose de-escalation to every 4 weeks negatively impacts treatment outcomes in real-life practice for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) during the first 2 years of treatment.
Methods: We enrolled 148 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up. We compared two homogenous groups in terms of severity: group A included 77 patients who never modified the interval of administration during follow-up; group B included 71 patients who extended the dosing interval to monthly administration. We compared the treatment outcomes and differences in safety.
Results: The monthly interval dose prolongation was started in 22/71 patients (30.99%) at 6 months, in 11/71 (15.48%) at 9 months, in 22/71 (30.99%) at 12 months, and in 16/71 (22.54%) at 18 months. The dose prolongation was to manage minor adverse events in 9 of 71 patients; persistent eosinophilia in 26/71 patients; specific request of patients who had confirmed sustained control as determined by the physician's assessment in 36/71 cases. Mean values of all outcomes of response to treatment (i.e., volume of polyps, nasal obstruction, quality of life, olfaction) significantly improved at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline (p < 0.01) in both groups A and B. No significant differences were found comparing groups A and B for any of the outcomes examined over the 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: These results suggest that extending to monthly dosing of dupilumab in real life does not negatively impact outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects