学前教师对ASD+ADHD的看法:患病率估计和教学准备。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sidni A Justus, Emily M Pogue, Victoria Simanovich
{"title":"学前教师对ASD+ADHD的看法:患病率估计和教学准备。","authors":"Sidni A Justus, Emily M Pogue, Victoria Simanovich","doi":"10.3390/children12030342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Teachers play a significant role in the identification and intervention of neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and ADHD. However, their perceptions of ASD+ADHD comorbidity remain underexplored. This study investigates teachers' estimates of ASD+ADHD prevalence and their perceived preparedness to teach students with co-occurring diagnoses, exploring key predictors of both outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-K-12 teachers (<i>N</i> = 199) completed demographic questions and four additional questionnaires assessing ASD- and ADHD-specific knowledge, neurodiversity attitudes and overall teaching self-efficacy. Participants estimated the prevalence of ASD+ADHD comorbidity and rated their preparedness to instruct students with ASD+ADHD, ASD-only, and ADHD-only. Regression analyses examined factors predicting prevalence estimates and preparedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teachers underestimated the lifetime prevalence of ASD+ADHD, though current prevalence estimates were more aligned with meta-analytic findings. Personal experience and current teaching of comorbid students predicted higher prevalence estimates, whereas greater ASD knowledge was associated with lower estimates. Preparedness to teach ASD+ADHD was rated lower than for ASD-only or ADHD-only students. Self-efficacy, neurodiversity attitudes, and professional training were predictors of preparedness. Current teaching of comorbid students, disorder-specific knowledge, and total years of teaching experience showed inconsistent associations across conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that while direct experience and training enhance both awareness and preparedness, disorder-specific knowledge alone does not consistently translate to confidence in supporting students with co-occurring diagnoses. Implications for teacher training and the need for comorbidity-focused professional development are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-K-12 Teachers' Views on ASD+ADHD: Prevalence Estimates and Teaching Preparedness.\",\"authors\":\"Sidni A Justus, Emily M Pogue, Victoria Simanovich\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/children12030342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Teachers play a significant role in the identification and intervention of neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and ADHD. However, their perceptions of ASD+ADHD comorbidity remain underexplored. This study investigates teachers' estimates of ASD+ADHD prevalence and their perceived preparedness to teach students with co-occurring diagnoses, exploring key predictors of both outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-K-12 teachers (<i>N</i> = 199) completed demographic questions and four additional questionnaires assessing ASD- and ADHD-specific knowledge, neurodiversity attitudes and overall teaching self-efficacy. Participants estimated the prevalence of ASD+ADHD comorbidity and rated their preparedness to instruct students with ASD+ADHD, ASD-only, and ADHD-only. Regression analyses examined factors predicting prevalence estimates and preparedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teachers underestimated the lifetime prevalence of ASD+ADHD, though current prevalence estimates were more aligned with meta-analytic findings. Personal experience and current teaching of comorbid students predicted higher prevalence estimates, whereas greater ASD knowledge was associated with lower estimates. Preparedness to teach ASD+ADHD was rated lower than for ASD-only or ADHD-only students. Self-efficacy, neurodiversity attitudes, and professional training were predictors of preparedness. Current teaching of comorbid students, disorder-specific knowledge, and total years of teaching experience showed inconsistent associations across conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that while direct experience and training enhance both awareness and preparedness, disorder-specific knowledge alone does not consistently translate to confidence in supporting students with co-occurring diagnoses. Implications for teacher training and the need for comorbidity-focused professional development are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children-Basel\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:教师在ASD和ADHD等神经发育障碍的识别和干预中发挥着重要作用。然而,他们对ASD+ADHD合并症的看法仍未得到充分探讨。本研究调查了教师对ASD+ADHD患病率的估计,以及他们对同时出现诊断的学生的教学准备,探索了这两种结果的关键预测因素。方法:199名k -12学前班教师分别完成人口统计学问卷和4份附加问卷,分别评估ASD和adhd特异性知识、神经多样性态度和整体教学自我效能感。参与者估计了ASD+ADHD合并症的患病率,并评估了他们指导ASD+ADHD、ASD-only和ADHD-only学生的准备情况。回归分析检查了预测患病率估计和准备情况的因素。结果:教师低估了ASD+ADHD的终生患病率,尽管目前的患病率估计与荟萃分析结果更加一致。个人经验和当前共病学生的教学预测了较高的患病率,而更多的ASD知识与较低的估计值相关。教授ASD+ADHD的准备程度比只教授ASD或只教授ADHD的学生要低。自我效能、神经多样性态度和专业训练是心理准备的预测因子。目前对共病学生的教学、疾病特异性知识和总教学经验年数在不同条件下显示出不一致的关联。结论:研究结果表明,虽然直接经验和培训增强了意识和准备,但仅靠特定疾病的知识并不能始终转化为支持患有合并诊断的学生的信心。讨论了对教师培训的影响和对以共病为重点的专业发展的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-K-12 Teachers' Views on ASD+ADHD: Prevalence Estimates and Teaching Preparedness.

Background/objectives: Teachers play a significant role in the identification and intervention of neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and ADHD. However, their perceptions of ASD+ADHD comorbidity remain underexplored. This study investigates teachers' estimates of ASD+ADHD prevalence and their perceived preparedness to teach students with co-occurring diagnoses, exploring key predictors of both outcomes.

Methods: Pre-K-12 teachers (N = 199) completed demographic questions and four additional questionnaires assessing ASD- and ADHD-specific knowledge, neurodiversity attitudes and overall teaching self-efficacy. Participants estimated the prevalence of ASD+ADHD comorbidity and rated their preparedness to instruct students with ASD+ADHD, ASD-only, and ADHD-only. Regression analyses examined factors predicting prevalence estimates and preparedness.

Results: Teachers underestimated the lifetime prevalence of ASD+ADHD, though current prevalence estimates were more aligned with meta-analytic findings. Personal experience and current teaching of comorbid students predicted higher prevalence estimates, whereas greater ASD knowledge was associated with lower estimates. Preparedness to teach ASD+ADHD was rated lower than for ASD-only or ADHD-only students. Self-efficacy, neurodiversity attitudes, and professional training were predictors of preparedness. Current teaching of comorbid students, disorder-specific knowledge, and total years of teaching experience showed inconsistent associations across conditions.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that while direct experience and training enhance both awareness and preparedness, disorder-specific knowledge alone does not consistently translate to confidence in supporting students with co-occurring diagnoses. Implications for teacher training and the need for comorbidity-focused professional development are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信