空间导航中听觉和自我运动线索的整合。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Corey S Shayman, Maggie K McCracken, Hunter C Finney, Peter C Fino, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Sarah H Creem-Regehr
{"title":"空间导航中听觉和自我运动线索的整合。","authors":"Corey S Shayman, Maggie K McCracken, Hunter C Finney, Peter C Fino, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Sarah H Creem-Regehr","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that auditory cues are integrated with other sensory cues for navigation. However, the extent to which auditory cues are used remains an open question, particularly in the context of reduced availability of visual landmarks. Sensory cue-combination paradigms have used homing tasks to quantify how much a single cue contributes to spatial updating. These paradigms have tested whether multisensory cue integration fits a model of optimal integration, or the reduction of multisensory variability in the form of a maximum likelihood function based on the variability of a single sensory cue. Here, we test the extent to which individuals rely on spatial auditory landmarks relative to body-based self-motion cues in the absence of useful visual landmarks. Twenty-seven participants with normal sensory acuity completed a homing task in virtual reality with auditory landmarks, self-motion cues, or both. Furthermore, a condition with a covert spatial conflict was introduced to test how much participants rely on either auditory landmarks or self-motion information. As a group, participants relied more on body-based self-motion cues than on auditory landmarks; however, there was a wide range of sensory cue weighting strategies. We found some support for optimal combination of these two sets of sensory cues, a novel pairing in the absence of visual spatial landmarks. Overall, these data indicate that the provision of auditory landmarks may complement spatial updating during navigation. This finding may be of particular value to individuals with visual impairments who struggle with effective spatial updating. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"664-675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of auditory and self-motion cues in spatial navigation.\",\"authors\":\"Corey S Shayman, Maggie K McCracken, Hunter C Finney, Peter C Fino, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Sarah H Creem-Regehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that auditory cues are integrated with other sensory cues for navigation. However, the extent to which auditory cues are used remains an open question, particularly in the context of reduced availability of visual landmarks. Sensory cue-combination paradigms have used homing tasks to quantify how much a single cue contributes to spatial updating. These paradigms have tested whether multisensory cue integration fits a model of optimal integration, or the reduction of multisensory variability in the form of a maximum likelihood function based on the variability of a single sensory cue. Here, we test the extent to which individuals rely on spatial auditory landmarks relative to body-based self-motion cues in the absence of useful visual landmarks. Twenty-seven participants with normal sensory acuity completed a homing task in virtual reality with auditory landmarks, self-motion cues, or both. Furthermore, a condition with a covert spatial conflict was introduced to test how much participants rely on either auditory landmarks or self-motion information. As a group, participants relied more on body-based self-motion cues than on auditory landmarks; however, there was a wide range of sensory cue weighting strategies. We found some support for optimal combination of these two sets of sensory cues, a novel pairing in the absence of visual spatial landmarks. Overall, these data indicate that the provision of auditory landmarks may complement spatial updating during navigation. This finding may be of particular value to individuals with visual impairments who struggle with effective spatial updating. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"664-675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,听觉线索与其他感官线索结合在一起,用于导航。然而,听觉线索的使用程度仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,特别是在视觉地标可用性降低的背景下。感官线索组合范式使用归巢任务来量化单个线索对空间更新的贡献。这些范式测试了多感觉线索整合是否符合最佳整合模型,或者以基于单个感觉线索可变性的最大似然函数的形式减少多感觉可变性。在这里,我们测试了在缺乏有用的视觉标志的情况下,个体对空间听觉标志的依赖程度相对于基于身体的自我运动线索。27名感官灵敏度正常的参与者在虚拟现实中通过听觉地标、自我运动线索或两者兼有完成了归航任务。此外,引入了一个隐蔽空间冲突的条件来测试参与者对听觉标志或自我运动信息的依赖程度。作为一个整体,参与者更多地依赖于基于身体的自我动作线索,而不是听觉标志;然而,有各种各样的感官线索加权策略。我们发现了这两组感官线索的最佳组合的一些支持,在缺乏视觉空间标志的情况下,这是一种新颖的配对。总的来说,这些数据表明,听觉地标的提供可以补充导航过程中的空间更新。这一发现可能对那些与有效空间更新斗争的视觉障碍患者特别有价值。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of auditory and self-motion cues in spatial navigation.

Previous studies have demonstrated that auditory cues are integrated with other sensory cues for navigation. However, the extent to which auditory cues are used remains an open question, particularly in the context of reduced availability of visual landmarks. Sensory cue-combination paradigms have used homing tasks to quantify how much a single cue contributes to spatial updating. These paradigms have tested whether multisensory cue integration fits a model of optimal integration, or the reduction of multisensory variability in the form of a maximum likelihood function based on the variability of a single sensory cue. Here, we test the extent to which individuals rely on spatial auditory landmarks relative to body-based self-motion cues in the absence of useful visual landmarks. Twenty-seven participants with normal sensory acuity completed a homing task in virtual reality with auditory landmarks, self-motion cues, or both. Furthermore, a condition with a covert spatial conflict was introduced to test how much participants rely on either auditory landmarks or self-motion information. As a group, participants relied more on body-based self-motion cues than on auditory landmarks; however, there was a wide range of sensory cue weighting strategies. We found some support for optimal combination of these two sets of sensory cues, a novel pairing in the absence of visual spatial landmarks. Overall, these data indicate that the provision of auditory landmarks may complement spatial updating during navigation. This finding may be of particular value to individuals with visual impairments who struggle with effective spatial updating. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信