评估新型胸部按压技术在婴儿心肺复苏术中的应用:提高疗效并减少单施救者的疲劳。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Marek Solecki, Monika Tomaszewska, Michal Pruc, Magdalena Myga-Nowak, Wojciech Wieczorek, Burak Katipoglu, Basar Cander, Lukasz Szarpak
{"title":"评估新型胸部按压技术在婴儿心肺复苏术中的应用:提高疗效并减少单施救者的疲劳。","authors":"Marek Solecki, Monika Tomaszewska, Michal Pruc, Magdalena Myga-Nowak, Wojciech Wieczorek, Burak Katipoglu, Basar Cander, Lukasz Szarpak","doi":"10.3390/children12030346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Effective infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) relies on high-quality chest compressions, yet the optimal technique for single-rescuer scenarios remains debated. Although widely used, the two-finger technique (TFT) is associated with an inadequate compression depth and increased rescuer fatigue. While the two-thumb encircling hands technique (TTHT) provides a superior compression depth, its application in single-rescuer scenarios is impractical. This study evaluates a novel technique (nT) as a potential alternative, aiming to optimize both compression efficacy and rescuer endurance. <b>Methods</b>: This randomized crossover study assessed the efficacy of the TFT, TTHT, and nT in a simulated infant CPR setting. Medical students trained in newborn and infant resuscitation performed all three techniques in a controlled environment using a high-fidelity neonatal simulator. We objectively measured and compared key CPR performance metrics, rescuer fatigue, and hand pain among the techniques. <b>Results</b>: The nT and TTHT outperformed the TFT in compression depth, rescuer endurance, and overall CPR quality. The nT achieved the highest adequate compression rate (92.4% vs. 78.6% for TTHT and 65.2% for TFT) while minimizing fatigue (RPE: 3.1 vs. 4.5 for TTHT and 6.2 for TFT) and hand pain (NRS: 1.8 vs. 3.9 for TTHT and 5.4 for TFT). TTHT produced the deepest compressions (mean: 44.2 mm vs. 42.9 mm for nT and 38.6 mm for TFT, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Rescuer anthropometric factors (sex, weight, and height) affected all techniques similarly, suggesting no inherent advantage based on body characteristics. <b>Conclusions</b>: Both the nT and TTHT outperformed the TFT, with the nT demonstrating superior rescuer endurance while maintaining high-quality compressions. Given its ergonomic benefits and effectiveness, the nT emerges as a promising alternative for single-rescuer infant CPR and warrants consideration for future resuscitation guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Novel Chest Compression Technique in Infant CPR: Enhancing Efficacy and Reducing Rescuer Fatigue in Single-Rescuer Scenarios.\",\"authors\":\"Marek Solecki, Monika Tomaszewska, Michal Pruc, Magdalena Myga-Nowak, Wojciech Wieczorek, Burak Katipoglu, Basar Cander, Lukasz Szarpak\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/children12030346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Effective infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) relies on high-quality chest compressions, yet the optimal technique for single-rescuer scenarios remains debated. Although widely used, the two-finger technique (TFT) is associated with an inadequate compression depth and increased rescuer fatigue. While the two-thumb encircling hands technique (TTHT) provides a superior compression depth, its application in single-rescuer scenarios is impractical. This study evaluates a novel technique (nT) as a potential alternative, aiming to optimize both compression efficacy and rescuer endurance. <b>Methods</b>: This randomized crossover study assessed the efficacy of the TFT, TTHT, and nT in a simulated infant CPR setting. Medical students trained in newborn and infant resuscitation performed all three techniques in a controlled environment using a high-fidelity neonatal simulator. We objectively measured and compared key CPR performance metrics, rescuer fatigue, and hand pain among the techniques. <b>Results</b>: The nT and TTHT outperformed the TFT in compression depth, rescuer endurance, and overall CPR quality. The nT achieved the highest adequate compression rate (92.4% vs. 78.6% for TTHT and 65.2% for TFT) while minimizing fatigue (RPE: 3.1 vs. 4.5 for TTHT and 6.2 for TFT) and hand pain (NRS: 1.8 vs. 3.9 for TTHT and 5.4 for TFT). TTHT produced the deepest compressions (mean: 44.2 mm vs. 42.9 mm for nT and 38.6 mm for TFT, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Rescuer anthropometric factors (sex, weight, and height) affected all techniques similarly, suggesting no inherent advantage based on body characteristics. <b>Conclusions</b>: Both the nT and TTHT outperformed the TFT, with the nT demonstrating superior rescuer endurance while maintaining high-quality compressions. Given its ergonomic benefits and effectiveness, the nT emerges as a promising alternative for single-rescuer infant CPR and warrants consideration for future resuscitation guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children-Basel\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030346\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12030346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:有效的婴儿心肺复苏(CPR)依赖于高质量的胸外按压,但对于单一救援人员情况下的最佳技术仍存在争议。虽然被广泛使用,但两指技术(TFT)与压缩深度不足和增加救援人员疲劳有关。虽然双拇指环抱技术(TTHT)提供了更好的压缩深度,但它在单个救援人员情况下的应用是不切实际的。本研究评估了一种新的技术(nT)作为潜在的替代方案,旨在优化压缩效果和救援人员的耐力。方法:这项随机交叉研究评估了TFT、TTHT和nT在模拟婴儿心肺复苏环境中的疗效。接受过新生儿和婴儿复苏训练的医学生使用高保真新生儿模拟器在受控环境中执行了所有三种技术。我们客观地测量和比较了关键的心肺复苏术表现指标、施救者疲劳和手部疼痛。结果:nT和TTHT在按压深度、施救者耐力和整体CPR质量方面优于TFT。nT达到了最高的充分压缩率(92.4%,TTHT组为78.6%,TFT组为65.2%),同时最小化了疲劳(RPE: 3.1, TTHT组为4.5,TFT组为6.2)和手痛(NRS: 1.8, TTHT组为3.9,TFT组为5.4)。TTHT产生最深的压迫(平均:44.2 mm, nT为42.9 mm, TFT为38.6 mm, p < 0.001)。救援者的人体测量因素(性别、体重和身高)对所有技术的影响相似,表明基于身体特征的技术没有固有优势。结论:nT和TTHT均优于TFT,其中nT在保持高质量压迫的同时表现出更强的救援耐力。鉴于其符合人体工程学的益处和有效性,nT成为单一救援人员婴儿心肺复苏术的有希望的替代方案,值得未来复苏指南的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Novel Chest Compression Technique in Infant CPR: Enhancing Efficacy and Reducing Rescuer Fatigue in Single-Rescuer Scenarios.

Background/Objectives: Effective infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) relies on high-quality chest compressions, yet the optimal technique for single-rescuer scenarios remains debated. Although widely used, the two-finger technique (TFT) is associated with an inadequate compression depth and increased rescuer fatigue. While the two-thumb encircling hands technique (TTHT) provides a superior compression depth, its application in single-rescuer scenarios is impractical. This study evaluates a novel technique (nT) as a potential alternative, aiming to optimize both compression efficacy and rescuer endurance. Methods: This randomized crossover study assessed the efficacy of the TFT, TTHT, and nT in a simulated infant CPR setting. Medical students trained in newborn and infant resuscitation performed all three techniques in a controlled environment using a high-fidelity neonatal simulator. We objectively measured and compared key CPR performance metrics, rescuer fatigue, and hand pain among the techniques. Results: The nT and TTHT outperformed the TFT in compression depth, rescuer endurance, and overall CPR quality. The nT achieved the highest adequate compression rate (92.4% vs. 78.6% for TTHT and 65.2% for TFT) while minimizing fatigue (RPE: 3.1 vs. 4.5 for TTHT and 6.2 for TFT) and hand pain (NRS: 1.8 vs. 3.9 for TTHT and 5.4 for TFT). TTHT produced the deepest compressions (mean: 44.2 mm vs. 42.9 mm for nT and 38.6 mm for TFT, p < 0.001). Rescuer anthropometric factors (sex, weight, and height) affected all techniques similarly, suggesting no inherent advantage based on body characteristics. Conclusions: Both the nT and TTHT outperformed the TFT, with the nT demonstrating superior rescuer endurance while maintaining high-quality compressions. Given its ergonomic benefits and effectiveness, the nT emerges as a promising alternative for single-rescuer infant CPR and warrants consideration for future resuscitation guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信