认知脱离综合征:十字路口的一个构念。

IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stephen P Becker
{"title":"认知脱离综合征:十字路口的一个构念。","authors":"Stephen P Becker","doi":"10.1037/amp0001517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Initially described in the mid-1980s, cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; previously termed sluggish cognitive tempo) is a set of symptoms comprising excessive daydreaming, mental confusion, and hypoactivity that is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychopathology dimensions and independently associated with functional outcomes. This article provides a broad overview of the history of the CDS construct, its terminology, and the current state of the science. Although there has been a marked upsurge in research on CDS, including psychometrically rigorous assessment tools and an emerging pattern of findings across numerous domains of functioning, the existing literature base also points to the importance of marshaling an ambitious research agenda that can guide CDS into its next era. Ten key research domains and open questions are highlighted, including (1) developmental course of CDS across the lifespan, (2) mechanisms linking CDS to functional outcomes and impairment, (3) importance of gathering normative data, (4) clarifying CDS and unidimensional or multidimensional, (5) etiologies of CDS, (6) neurobiology and psychophysiology of CDS, (7) CDS as a transdiagnostic trait, (8) understanding individuals with elevated CDS, (9) promoting participatory approaches and valuing lived experience, and (10) the role of CDS for intervention. Implications of this research for possible conceptualizations of CDS as a distinct disorder, diagnostic specifier, or transdiagnostic dimension are discussed. The road ahead will require increased collaboration, creativity, and rigor to build theory, and, ultimately, support the well-being of individuals with this syndrome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive disengagement syndrome: A construct at the crossroads.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen P Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Initially described in the mid-1980s, cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; previously termed sluggish cognitive tempo) is a set of symptoms comprising excessive daydreaming, mental confusion, and hypoactivity that is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychopathology dimensions and independently associated with functional outcomes. This article provides a broad overview of the history of the CDS construct, its terminology, and the current state of the science. Although there has been a marked upsurge in research on CDS, including psychometrically rigorous assessment tools and an emerging pattern of findings across numerous domains of functioning, the existing literature base also points to the importance of marshaling an ambitious research agenda that can guide CDS into its next era. Ten key research domains and open questions are highlighted, including (1) developmental course of CDS across the lifespan, (2) mechanisms linking CDS to functional outcomes and impairment, (3) importance of gathering normative data, (4) clarifying CDS and unidimensional or multidimensional, (5) etiologies of CDS, (6) neurobiology and psychophysiology of CDS, (7) CDS as a transdiagnostic trait, (8) understanding individuals with elevated CDS, (9) promoting participatory approaches and valuing lived experience, and (10) the role of CDS for intervention. Implications of this research for possible conceptualizations of CDS as a distinct disorder, diagnostic specifier, or transdiagnostic dimension are discussed. The road ahead will require increased collaboration, creativity, and rigor to build theory, and, ultimately, support the well-being of individuals with this syndrome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001517\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最初在20世纪80年代中期被描述为认知脱离综合征(CDS;(以前称为迟缓的认知节奏)是一组症状,包括过度白日梦、精神混乱和活动不足,不同于注意力缺陷/多动障碍和其他精神病理维度,与功能结果独立相关。本文提供了CDS结构的历史、术语和当前科学状态的广泛概述。尽管对CDS的研究有了显著的增长,包括心理测量学上严格的评估工具和跨许多功能领域的新发现模式,但现有的文献基础也指出了制定雄心勃勃的研究议程的重要性,这可以引导CDS进入下一个时代。重点介绍了10个关键研究领域和开放性问题,包括:(1)CDS在整个生命周期中的发展过程,(2)将CDS与功能结果和损伤联系起来的机制,(3)收集规范数据的重要性,(4)阐明CDS和一维或多维的关系,(5)CDS的病因学,(6)CDS的神经生物学和心理生理学,(7)CDS作为一种跨诊断特征,(8)了解CDS升高的个体。(9)促进参与性方法和重视生活经验,(10)CDS在干预中的作用。本研究的含义可能概念化CDS作为一个独特的障碍,诊断说明,或跨诊断的维度进行了讨论。未来的道路将需要加强合作、创造力和严谨性,以建立理论,并最终支持患有这种综合征的个人的福祉。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive disengagement syndrome: A construct at the crossroads.

Initially described in the mid-1980s, cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; previously termed sluggish cognitive tempo) is a set of symptoms comprising excessive daydreaming, mental confusion, and hypoactivity that is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychopathology dimensions and independently associated with functional outcomes. This article provides a broad overview of the history of the CDS construct, its terminology, and the current state of the science. Although there has been a marked upsurge in research on CDS, including psychometrically rigorous assessment tools and an emerging pattern of findings across numerous domains of functioning, the existing literature base also points to the importance of marshaling an ambitious research agenda that can guide CDS into its next era. Ten key research domains and open questions are highlighted, including (1) developmental course of CDS across the lifespan, (2) mechanisms linking CDS to functional outcomes and impairment, (3) importance of gathering normative data, (4) clarifying CDS and unidimensional or multidimensional, (5) etiologies of CDS, (6) neurobiology and psychophysiology of CDS, (7) CDS as a transdiagnostic trait, (8) understanding individuals with elevated CDS, (9) promoting participatory approaches and valuing lived experience, and (10) the role of CDS for intervention. Implications of this research for possible conceptualizations of CDS as a distinct disorder, diagnostic specifier, or transdiagnostic dimension are discussed. The road ahead will require increased collaboration, creativity, and rigor to build theory, and, ultimately, support the well-being of individuals with this syndrome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信