医疗不信任:一个概念分析。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Meghna Shukla, Marvin Schilt-Solberg, Wanda Gibson-Scipio
{"title":"医疗不信任:一个概念分析。","authors":"Meghna Shukla, Marvin Schilt-Solberg, Wanda Gibson-Scipio","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15030103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The term \"medical mistrust\" has increased in literary usage within the last ten years, but the term has not yet been fully conceptualized. This article analyzes the usage of the term \"medical mistrust\" in the extant literature in order to articulate its antecedents, attributes, and consequences. The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary conceptual definition and conceptual figure for medical mistrust. <b>Methods:</b> Walker and Avant's method of conceptual analysis was used to extract concept attributes, antecedents, and consequences and define empirical referents. The databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PSYCinfo and the Google search engine were used. <b>Results:</b> Medical mistrust is a social determinant of health fueled by a fear of harm and exploitation and is experienced at both the interpersonal, intergenerational, and institutional levels, reinforced by structural racism and systemic inequalities. Medical mistrust is antedated by historical trauma, socioeconomic disparities, medical gaslighting, traumatic medical experiences, maladaptive health beliefs and behaviors, and individual minority identities and is transmitted intergenerationally and culturally. The consequences of medical mistrust include the underutilization of health services, delays in diagnosis and care, poor treatment adherence, poor health outcomes, negative psychological effects, and an increase in the uptake of medical misinformation and maladaptive health behaviors. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this concept analysis have important implications for healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and researchers, as well as healthcare policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Mistrust: A Concept Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Meghna Shukla, Marvin Schilt-Solberg, Wanda Gibson-Scipio\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15030103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The term \\\"medical mistrust\\\" has increased in literary usage within the last ten years, but the term has not yet been fully conceptualized. This article analyzes the usage of the term \\\"medical mistrust\\\" in the extant literature in order to articulate its antecedents, attributes, and consequences. The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary conceptual definition and conceptual figure for medical mistrust. <b>Methods:</b> Walker and Avant's method of conceptual analysis was used to extract concept attributes, antecedents, and consequences and define empirical referents. The databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PSYCinfo and the Google search engine were used. <b>Results:</b> Medical mistrust is a social determinant of health fueled by a fear of harm and exploitation and is experienced at both the interpersonal, intergenerational, and institutional levels, reinforced by structural racism and systemic inequalities. Medical mistrust is antedated by historical trauma, socioeconomic disparities, medical gaslighting, traumatic medical experiences, maladaptive health beliefs and behaviors, and individual minority identities and is transmitted intergenerationally and culturally. The consequences of medical mistrust include the underutilization of health services, delays in diagnosis and care, poor treatment adherence, poor health outcomes, negative psychological effects, and an increase in the uptake of medical misinformation and maladaptive health behaviors. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this concept analysis have important implications for healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and researchers, as well as healthcare policy makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去十年中,“医疗不信任”一词在文学使用中有所增加,但该术语尚未完全概念化。本文分析了现有文献中“医疗不信任”一词的用法,以阐明其前因后果、属性和后果。本文的目的是为医疗不信任提供一个初步的概念定义和概念图。方法:采用Walker和Avant的概念分析方法提取概念属性、前因和后果,并定义经验指称物。使用PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、PSYCinfo等数据库和谷歌搜索引擎。结果:医疗不信任是健康的一个社会决定因素,由对伤害和剥削的恐惧推动,在人际、代际和机构层面都有经历,并因结构性种族主义和系统性不平等而加强。医疗不信任是由历史创伤、社会经济差异、医疗煤气灯、创伤性医疗经历、适应不良的健康信念和行为以及个人的少数民族身份引起的,并在代际和文化上传播。医疗不信任的后果包括保健服务利用不足、诊断和护理延误、治疗依从性差、健康结果差、负面心理影响,以及接受医疗错误信息和适应不良健康行为的人数增加。结论:这一概念分析的发现对医疗保健提供者、医疗保健系统、研究人员以及医疗保健政策制定者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Mistrust: A Concept Analysis.

Background: The term "medical mistrust" has increased in literary usage within the last ten years, but the term has not yet been fully conceptualized. This article analyzes the usage of the term "medical mistrust" in the extant literature in order to articulate its antecedents, attributes, and consequences. The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary conceptual definition and conceptual figure for medical mistrust. Methods: Walker and Avant's method of conceptual analysis was used to extract concept attributes, antecedents, and consequences and define empirical referents. The databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PSYCinfo and the Google search engine were used. Results: Medical mistrust is a social determinant of health fueled by a fear of harm and exploitation and is experienced at both the interpersonal, intergenerational, and institutional levels, reinforced by structural racism and systemic inequalities. Medical mistrust is antedated by historical trauma, socioeconomic disparities, medical gaslighting, traumatic medical experiences, maladaptive health beliefs and behaviors, and individual minority identities and is transmitted intergenerationally and culturally. The consequences of medical mistrust include the underutilization of health services, delays in diagnosis and care, poor treatment adherence, poor health outcomes, negative psychological effects, and an increase in the uptake of medical misinformation and maladaptive health behaviors. Conclusions: The findings of this concept analysis have important implications for healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and researchers, as well as healthcare policy makers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信