将主动学习方法融入护生临床营养教育:一项准实验研究。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Stefano Mancin, Giovanni Cangelosi, Marco Sguanci, Sofia Matteucci, Emanuela Morenghi, Diego Lopane, Daniela Cattani, Simone Cosmai, Giulia Vinciguerra, Mauro Parozzi, Sara Morales Palomares, Beatrice Mazzoleni
{"title":"将主动学习方法融入护生临床营养教育:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Stefano Mancin, Giovanni Cangelosi, Marco Sguanci, Sofia Matteucci, Emanuela Morenghi, Diego Lopane, Daniela Cattani, Simone Cosmai, Giulia Vinciguerra, Mauro Parozzi, Sara Morales Palomares, Beatrice Mazzoleni","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15030077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Clinical nutrition is essential in nursing care, with nurses playing a key role in supporting patients' dietary needs. <b>Aim</b>: To assess the impact of active learning methodologies on clinical nutrition education, focusing on knowledge retention among nursing students. <b>Methods</b>: Using a quasi-experimental research design, we enrolled 131 s-year nursing students. Both groups attended an eight-hour seminar on clinical nutrition, incorporating critical thinking. The experimental group had prior exposure to active learning and ICT in their first-year course, while the control group received traditional teaching. Knowledge was assessed using a validated questionnaire on basic and clinical nutrition. <b>Results</b>: The experimental group scored higher in both basic and clinical nutrition, indicating that active learning improves immediate learning and long-term retention. One year later, they retained significant knowledge, particularly regarding nutrient-disease relationships. <b>Conclusions</b>: Active learning, particularly critical thinking, enhances short- and long-term outcomes in clinical nutrition education. Future studies should refine assessment tools and explore further integration of active learning into nursing curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Active Learning Methodologies into Clinical Nutrition Education for Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Mancin, Giovanni Cangelosi, Marco Sguanci, Sofia Matteucci, Emanuela Morenghi, Diego Lopane, Daniela Cattani, Simone Cosmai, Giulia Vinciguerra, Mauro Parozzi, Sara Morales Palomares, Beatrice Mazzoleni\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15030077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Clinical nutrition is essential in nursing care, with nurses playing a key role in supporting patients' dietary needs. <b>Aim</b>: To assess the impact of active learning methodologies on clinical nutrition education, focusing on knowledge retention among nursing students. <b>Methods</b>: Using a quasi-experimental research design, we enrolled 131 s-year nursing students. Both groups attended an eight-hour seminar on clinical nutrition, incorporating critical thinking. The experimental group had prior exposure to active learning and ICT in their first-year course, while the control group received traditional teaching. Knowledge was assessed using a validated questionnaire on basic and clinical nutrition. <b>Results</b>: The experimental group scored higher in both basic and clinical nutrition, indicating that active learning improves immediate learning and long-term retention. One year later, they retained significant knowledge, particularly regarding nutrient-disease relationships. <b>Conclusions</b>: Active learning, particularly critical thinking, enhances short- and long-term outcomes in clinical nutrition education. Future studies should refine assessment tools and explore further integration of active learning into nursing curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床营养在护理中至关重要,护士在支持患者的饮食需求方面发挥着关键作用。目的:评估主动学习方法对临床营养教育的影响,重点关注护理学生的知识保留。方法:采用准实验研究设计,招募131名5年级护理专业学生。两组都参加了一个八小时的临床营养学研讨会,包括批判性思维。实验组在第一年的课程中预先接触主动学习和ICT,而对照组则接受传统教学。使用有效的基础和临床营养问卷对知识进行评估。结果:实验组在基础和临床营养方面得分较高,表明主动学习提高了即时学习和长期记忆。一年后,他们保留了重要的知识,特别是关于营养与疾病的关系。结论:主动学习,特别是批判性思维,可以提高临床营养教育的短期和长期效果。未来的研究应完善评估工具,并进一步探索将主动学习融入护理课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Active Learning Methodologies into Clinical Nutrition Education for Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Background: Clinical nutrition is essential in nursing care, with nurses playing a key role in supporting patients' dietary needs. Aim: To assess the impact of active learning methodologies on clinical nutrition education, focusing on knowledge retention among nursing students. Methods: Using a quasi-experimental research design, we enrolled 131 s-year nursing students. Both groups attended an eight-hour seminar on clinical nutrition, incorporating critical thinking. The experimental group had prior exposure to active learning and ICT in their first-year course, while the control group received traditional teaching. Knowledge was assessed using a validated questionnaire on basic and clinical nutrition. Results: The experimental group scored higher in both basic and clinical nutrition, indicating that active learning improves immediate learning and long-term retention. One year later, they retained significant knowledge, particularly regarding nutrient-disease relationships. Conclusions: Active learning, particularly critical thinking, enhances short- and long-term outcomes in clinical nutrition education. Future studies should refine assessment tools and explore further integration of active learning into nursing curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信